72 control arms vs 73
I'm considering using a front steering Chevy C10 cross member (or at least control arms) on my 1937 Buick Hot Rod.
From what I have read, the biggest difference from 72 to 73 control arms is the switch to rubber bushings. 72 control arms are less expensive, but would I be better off with 73 control arms? Thanks |
Re: 72 control arms vs 73
Personally, I think the truck front end is too wide for a 30's car. You would be much better served with a Camaro or Nova subframe or an A body donor such as a Chevelle. Or even an S10 for that matter. And any of those tap you into the 4 3/4" bolt circle wheels which there are more choices.
|
Re: 72 control arms vs 73
Why not just get a mustang II kit for it?
Probably look cleaner and the rack and pinon steering is easier to deal with. |
Re: 72 control arms vs 73
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Do you think 72 C10 control arms would be 73 better and why? |
Re: 72 control arms vs 73
Quote:
I would like to adapt and keep those pockets if possible I got a killer deal on a RetroRack (Australian company) to adapt rack and pinion. Do you think 72 C10 control arms would be 73 better and why? |
Re: 72 control arms vs 73
Stick with a mustang II suspension set up. You will be glad you did.
Vic |
Re: 72 control arms vs 73
Quote:
|
Re: 72 control arms vs 73
I converted my '68 to later model front suspension to get disc brakes and have run the older control arms on other trucks. I have been happy with both. As long as all parts are in good condition they both work just as well. If you are concerned about deflection on the rubber bushings you can always go with urethane.
|
Re: 72 control arms vs 73
Quote:
Do the older style arms need to be greased more often? Do the arms with rubber bushings provide a smoother or less jarring ride? |
Re: 72 control arms vs 73
Quote:
|
Re: 72 control arms vs 73
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com