View Single Post
Old 06-16-2012, 01:23 AM   #7
storm9c1
*** That's interesting ***
 
storm9c1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,772
Re: using early ramhorns on a 350

I agree. With the exception of the collector (2" on trucks versus 2 1/2" straight dumps on Vettes), they should be the same. I don't think the ports are different. Though if you have some time and tools, a die grinder can really make a difference! :-)

I've always run ramhorns, even on my 383 stroker. It's a low RPM beast, and usually stays below 4000 RPM, and never sees over 5200 RPM. It's a workhorse and needs nothing special. Ramhorns work great, no problems, no leaks. They just work. And if they fail, I can order new ones all day long from local parts stores. I do run good foil gaskets with mine, always have on all cast iron exhaust manifolds on all SBCs. New parts store ramhorns come with them in the box. Every once in a while, I had a cheapo gasket blow out, but the good foil Felpro ones work fine. But as mentioned, some choose not to use gaskets, which is fine too. YMMV.

By the way, that's cool running ramhorns on a LT1. The stock LT1 manifolds flow better, but I can see how the ramhorns would fit better in some cases.

The other thing I find interesting about your swap from a C-60 is the engine type. Back in the older days, a C-60 would have a tall deck engine. Usually like a 366, 409, or 427. Or even a huge 351 V6.
__________________
Tom
Chevy by day...
1969 Chevy C30 Rollback Tow Truck -- 383 stroker, 4L80E
2011 Chevy Caprice PPV 9C3 6.0L
1995 Chevy Caprice 9C1
1994 Chevy Caprice 9C1 #3
1995 Chevy Caprice Wagon #2
1995 Chevy Impala SS
Mopar by night...
1969 Dodge Charger
1972 Chrysler Newport 2dr Hardtop (27K miles)

Plus others...

Last edited by storm9c1; 06-16-2012 at 01:37 AM.
storm9c1 is offline   Reply With Quote