Quote:
Originally Posted by _Ogre
i imagine had photosuckit done that originally they would have had many takers, but to offer this a year later probably won't save them
to many people have moved on from photosuckit
|
they DID do this originally. they started at 9.99 a year actually. then went to 29.99, then 49.99. then FOUR HUNDRED. it didnt work at 9.99 and it REALLY didnt work at 399.
the reason why is because facebook quietly bought photobucket, they already owned instagram. why have three photo sharing sites? the way you move people from one to another is to make one free (facebook, instagram are free) and the last cost money.
I replaced all my images with people flipping the bird. screw em.