View Single Post
Old 04-04-2018, 11:26 PM   #5
'63GENIII
Registered User
 
'63GENIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Carlos, Ca.
Posts: 3,048
Re: shifting nv4500 vs sm465

Quote:
Originally Posted by B. W. View Post
I've driven both early & late in more that a few rigs (only one was mine) and never really felt a difference. If one did shift hard I attributed it to the clutch or the gear lube. It may be an issue but I never perceived it. If I were buying one I wouldn't be concerned about it.

They all shifted better than the 465, with that said, I think the 465 shifts fine.
^^^This.

My beat up 465 shifted great once I learned it's personality. If it didn't shift well, it was user error.

That said, my early 4500 shifts like I would think a Porsche would compared to the 456. Never drove a later model but would expect the same or better.

I have heard that the round tower transmissions "can" be prone to dragging the shift forks if the shift stub "ball" starts wearing into the top cover. I have heard that the square top (later 4500) design eliminates this possibility. Again, Ive only heard this and not experienced it firsthand.

FWIW, my 4500 was rode hard and put away wet when I got it. If any transmission could have been worn at the stub shift ball, it would have been that one.
__________________
Chris


'63 k15 long step
Vortec 7.4 - L29 Blackbear tune, Five 0 Motorsports injectors, Chris Straub Cam, NV4500, divorced 205
52" front and 63" rear spring swap
D44 / 14bff - disc axles
Milemarker 9K and 10.5K hydraulic winches

63" & B52 Spring Install http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...ng+swap+thread


NV4500 Reverse Build Thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=reverse+build

L29 - 7.4 Vortec Build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...&highlight=L29
'63GENIII is offline   Reply With Quote