View Single Post
Old 09-11-2017, 11:37 PM   #7
MikeB
Senior Member
 
MikeB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: North Texas
Posts: 3,411
Re: Rams horn manifolds

Quote:
Originally Posted by 72freak View Post
This is a common misconception. Straight dump 2.5 ram horns clear fine. I put them on every 67-72 I built over the past 20 years. 2x4, 4x4. Now with that said, the kick backs do allow for less of a bend at the start of the exhaust pipe and i will certainly give them a try on one of my next builds!.
Interesting. I had a pair of the 2.5" Dormans that would have required a very tight radius bend on my old 69 C10. I am partial to large mandrel bends, and doubt one could be made that tight. The larger the radius the better! However, those manifolds would have worked on a K10, because the engine was mounted farther back.

On my 82 C10, I might have been able to make them fit had I notched the motor mount clam shells, but would have had the same issue with the tight bends.

If the OP needs manifolds, I have these sitting on the shelf. They're for a 96-up 350. I used them on my 82 C10 for a year or so before I switched to headers. What I like about them is they don't have air injection ports. The stub pipes and flanges are 2-1/4".







__________________
Mike
1969 C10 LWB -- owned for 34 years. 350/TH350, 3.08 posi, 1st Gen Vintage Air, AAW wiring harness, 5-lug conversion, 1985 spindles and brakes.
1982 C10 SWB -- sold
1981 C10 Silverado LWB -- sold, but wish I still had it!
1969 C10 (not the current one) that I bought in the early 1980s. Paid $1200; sold for $1500 a few years later. Just a hint at the appreciation that was coming.
Retired as a factory automation products salesman.
Worked part-time over the years for an engine builder and a classic car repair shop.
Member here for 23 years! This is the very first car/truck Internet forum I joined. I still used a dial-up modem back then!
MikeB is offline   Reply With Quote