View Single Post
Old 12-16-2009, 03:50 PM   #57
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,910
Re: 86 C10 Trailing Arm Conversion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Super73 View Post
...Neither are the 63-66's. The nice thing about the earlier ones is the panhard bar is longer and located on the axle tube. A longer PH is going to have less side to side movement under a bump. Although, this could always be addressed with a custom fabed ph bar. You want it as long as possible.
I listed the 67-69's as they're typically the sure thing because you get 30-spline axles already. The earlier 63-64's (maybe some 65's) had the weaker 17-spline axles.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote