View Single Post
Old 09-16-2020, 11:38 AM   #5
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,910
Re: A 2-link question-

Quote:
Originally Posted by Low Elco View Post
Yes, but T/A outboard of the rails.
So T/A's instead of leaf springs in the leaf springs original mounting position?
The leaf springs over-all length is about the same as a T/A (leafs @ 52-56"; T/A @ ~51"). However, the leaf locates the rear housing mid-length of the spring pack where the T/A is much farther rear ward. This would require moving the hangers forward.

If this is what you meant, the difference is the original mounting position places the T/A's in a triangle configuration which allows for some articulation. Combing the triangulated front mounting w/the I-beams ability to slightly twist & return to form as well as rubber bushings @ the front mount allow the system to flex.

Mounting in an 'H' or 'U' pattern is going to significantly limit that small amount of flex.
It's also going to impact the pinion angle changes throughout suspension travel & would need to be kept in mind.

2-links can work w/some effort but there are better ways to get things done vs re-purposing OE T/A's.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote