View Single Post
Old 09-16-2020, 12:07 PM   #9
Low Elco
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Indep, MO
Posts: 5,893
Re: A 2-link question-

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTI View Post
So T/A's instead of leaf springs in the leaf springs original mounting position?
The leaf springs over-all length is about the same as a T/A (leafs @ 52-56"; T/A @ ~51"). However, the leaf locates the rear housing mid-length of the spring pack where the T/A is much farther rear ward. This would require moving the hangers forward.

If this is what you meant, the difference is the original mounting position places the T/A's in a triangle configuration which allows for some articulation. Combing the triangulated front mounting w/the I-beams ability to slightly twist & return to form as well as rubber bushings @ the front mount allow the system to flex.

Mounting in an 'H' or 'U' pattern is going to significantly limit that small amount of flex.
It's also going to impact the pinion angle changes throughout suspension travel & would need to be kept in mind.

2-links can work w/some effort but there are better ways to get things done vs re-purposing OE T/A's.

Intention is to move spring mounts forward, to mirror stock 67-67 lengths.
Low Elco is offline   Reply With Quote