View Single Post
Old 03-04-2011, 03:00 PM   #22
ProStreet68SB
The Engine Whisperer
 
ProStreet68SB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 770
Re: 350 vs 366 performance?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1972SuperCheyenne View Post
I dont understand taking the 366 and adding the most restrictive BBC heads possible. Just build a .30 over 350(355) and add some stock Vortec heads and 4 barrel Vortec style intake, cam and headers. Then you'll have nearly 400 horses to play with. The 366 just isnt wort the money it'll take to make it worth the trouble/
Peanut ports arent nearly as horrible as people think they are. It's been a few years since seeing it, but I remember a guy over on 454ss.com putting peanut ports on his BBC chevelle and take it into the 8s.




To the OP, 366s are absolute turds. The only tall deck motor worth owning is a 427 tall deck.
__________________
-Automatics win races, 6-speeds impress high school kids
-Save a tree, support your local dragstrip.
-"Failure - The Secret To Success, the idea is that you can fail 100 times as long as you can succeed once" -Takeo Fukui
columbuscarsandcoffee.net and on Facebook
ProStreet68SB is offline   Reply With Quote