The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Engine & Drivetrain

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-14-2011, 12:52 PM   #1
Supertommy68
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Molalla, OR
Posts: 13
Ramhorns vs. headers

I have the original "ramhorn" style exhaust manifolds on my 72 C10 350. Its not souped up or anything, just a driver. Father in law says put headers on. Which is better? Also, I had dual exhaust put on way back when. Each side goes straight to the back, no crossover. Father-in-law says "you have to have a crossover pipe". Really?
Supertommy68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2011, 01:03 PM   #2
fastwillie 696969
~Rest In Peace~
 
fastwillie 696969's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: CALIFORNIA NOR CAL
Posts: 9,707
Re: Ramhorns vs. headers

daily driver and no problems ,why change it if your happy with it ,
__________________
is it fast ? it has a lighting bolt donut?


B___H please, I can remove 90% of your so called "beauty" with a kleenex
fastwillie 696969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2011, 01:04 PM   #3
Eddie H.
Registered User
 
Eddie H.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Paradise TX USA
Posts: 1,200
Re: Ramhorns vs. headers

For an unmodified, or mildly modified engine, ram horns are a good choice. ( low maintenance and no leaks). Dual exhaust are fine, with or without a crossover pipe, although a crossover is supposed to give you a little better flow and sound quality.
__________________
"Negative people always seem to have a problem for every solution"
Eddie H. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2011, 01:17 PM   #4
faribran
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: AL
Posts: 1,828
Re: Ramhorns vs. headers

fastwillie summed it up......... i like my rams horns.. and i have had headers..
__________________
"
faribran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2011, 01:28 PM   #5
Supertommy68
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Molalla, OR
Posts: 13
Re: Ramhorns vs. headers

I've seen how much room the headers take and prefer mine the way it is, but the exhaust needs some work towards the back and I thought about modifications. Plus, Father-In-Law is "helping" me with the truck. He is a big GMC guy (has 1-71 runner and 2-71 builders). He says crossover pipe helps "equalize the exhaust pressure". I'm no gearhead but I second-guess him all the time. Probably why we get along so well....
Supertommy68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2011, 02:05 PM   #6
storm9c1
*** That's interesting ***
 
storm9c1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,772
Re: Ramhorns vs. headers

H-pipes help with sound more-so than performance. X-pipes help with performance. All probably overkill for a truck/car that is stock or very mild. I've added H-pipes on cars to fix bad exhaust drones at certain RPMs.

As for ramhorns, I'm a big fan of them for stock/mild engines. They are pretty much maintenance free. You could work them over for a little better appearance and performance. Low RPM engines (5500 and less) work just fine with ramhorns. If you want something that spins at 6000+ RPM with a Holley 750, heads, intake, cam, etc, then you'd be wasting time/money by NOT using quality tube headers. Cheapo headers are usually never a good option over ramhorns IMHO.
__________________
Tom
Chevy by day...
1969 Chevy C30 Rollback Tow Truck -- 383 stroker, 4L80E
2011 Chevy Caprice PPV 9C3 6.0L
1995 Chevy Caprice 9C1
1994 Chevy Caprice 9C1 #3
1995 Chevy Caprice Wagon #2
1995 Chevy Impala SS
Mopar by night...
1969 Dodge Charger
1972 Chrysler Newport 2dr Hardtop (27K miles)

Plus others...

Last edited by storm9c1; 07-14-2011 at 02:11 PM.
storm9c1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2011, 02:40 PM   #7
Supertommy68
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Molalla, OR
Posts: 13
Re: Ramhorns vs. headers

Thanks for all the info everyone. Based on all this, I think I will leave the ramhorns on there. I'll probably do the crossover to keep pops happy. Its a 4x, so I'll have to pick a suitable location. As stock it used to run single down the driver-side frame rail, with a Y-pipe to the passenger side right in front of the torque converter I think. Could maybe do "H" there. I think "X" might be hard to get in there. Thanks again Oh one more thing, should I upsize it? Right now its 2".
Supertommy68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2011, 02:46 PM   #8
GASoline71
"I ain't nobody, dork."
 
GASoline71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Whidbey Island, Washington
Posts: 8,947
Re: Ramhorns vs. headers

Stick with the ramhorns unless you're making other performance upgrades. While you're at it... clean them ramhorns up and hit them with some of the High temp pain from the Eastwood Company. They'll look factory original...

Gary
__________________
'cuz chicks dig scars...

My 1972 GMC 1500 Super Custom (Creeping Death) "long term" build thread.

The Rebuild of Creeping Death after the wreck

Quote:
Originally Posted by LONGHAIR View Post
I would never rebuild a 305.
Quote:
Originally Posted by prostreetC-10 View Post
I love using vacuum gauges as part of the carb tuning process. I hook the gauge to the inside of my garbage can and leave it there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marv D View Post
Remember Murphys 2nd law of mechanical relationships... "OPPOSING COMPONENTS ATTEMPTING TO OCCUPY THE SAME SPACE, AT THE SAME TIME, GENERALLY END UP OCCUPYING ADJOINING SPACE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE OIL PAN"
Quote:
Originally Posted by cableguy0 View Post
Its cheaper to listen to advice given when you ask for help than it is to ignore everyone and wait for carnage.
GASoline71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2011, 11:33 PM   #9
rickpilgrim
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Wausau, WI
Posts: 591
Re: Ramhorns vs. headers

On mild 350's we like 2 1/4" pipe in duals and yes, we run an H pipe but it is for a mellower exhaust note.
rickpilgrim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2011, 03:14 AM   #10
BigDan3131
Registered User
 
BigDan3131's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Maple Valley, WA
Posts: 1,913
Re: Ramhorns vs. headers

Hang on to your Horns if you ever decide to upgrade later on as they are kinda hard to find and when you do well $$$.
BigDan3131 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2011, 09:59 AM   #11
1972RedNeck
Registered User
 
1972RedNeck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Townsend MT
Posts: 1,725
Re: Ramhorns vs. headers

I run 2 1/2 ram horns. Here is a dyno comparison between ramhorns/headers.

http://www.chevytalk.org/fusionbb/sh...hp?tid/256915/
__________________
1966 F250 4X4 416
1972 K20 350 4 OTF
Quote:
Originally Posted by GASoline71 View Post
I once pulled an intake manifold for a cam swap... ended up with a full on drag car that ran in the 11's.
1972RedNeck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2011, 12:38 PM   #12
Supertommy68
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Molalla, OR
Posts: 13
Re: Ramhorns vs. headers

cool dyno video. I like how calm they are when putting the fire out. I have cherry bombs on this thing now, I think 2". Any suggestions a different setup?
Supertommy68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com