The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-15-2015, 11:26 AM   #1
monte0185
Registered User
 
monte0185's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Brighton, TN
Posts: 1,267
6.2L or 8.1L

My 86 Crew Cab C30 has a tired old 454 and im going to be replacing it in the next couple months. Ive really been looking into using an 8.1 cause it bolts in place of the 454 thats in it and saves me from having to buy a new transmission as well as several other things that have to be modded for the LS platform. But at the same time if I can snag a 4l80/5 I can put my gear vendors overdrive unit on it and have underdrive as well. However the 6.2L has its perks as about the same HP not as much torque but easily upgraded and lots of aftermarket parts for support. So I guess while im pondering Ill put it out to you guys to see what you think. I will be pulling a 30+ foot camper and maybe at times a GN or 5th wheel car trailer. Just a little more info.

Pic of the dually for reference.
Attached Images
  
__________________
A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.

Duct tape is like the force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the world together.
monte0185 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2015, 01:18 PM   #2
Bigstevex4
Registered User
 
Bigstevex4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Spearfish South Dakota
Posts: 407
Re: 6.2L or 8.1L

Had an 02 with a 8.1 loved power but was hard on gas. Had a new 02 work truck same time it had 6.0 . It had decent power and better mileage not sure what 6.2 is old diesel? Oh ya nice truck.
__________________
83 c10 long Box Daily Driver
90 Jimmy parked
98 Road King/ 06 Road Glide
In memorium
63 impala SS/ 65 Chevy Panel
65 GMC Short Box/ 68 Camero
Bigstevex4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2015, 02:29 PM   #3
monte0185
Registered User
 
monte0185's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Brighton, TN
Posts: 1,267
Re: 6.2L or 8.1L

6.2 is the latest LS engine came in the escalades and the denali's. I had an escalade with one and it did good for towing my 18ft trailer with a truck on it. This truck is a bit heavier and ill be pulling bigger loads. I guess the question is how good of gas mileage do i really expect out of either setup pulling a huge 30ft camper?
__________________
A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.

Duct tape is like the force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the world together.
monte0185 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2015, 03:34 PM   #4
Bigstevex4
Registered User
 
Bigstevex4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Spearfish South Dakota
Posts: 407
Re: 6.2L or 8.1L

Wow punch 6.2 in lot talk. Looked at a crate Eng. 8 grand have to run premium gas I would probably just rebuild the 454. have 5 grand left over for gas.
__________________
83 c10 long Box Daily Driver
90 Jimmy parked
98 Road King/ 06 Road Glide
In memorium
63 impala SS/ 65 Chevy Panel
65 GMC Short Box/ 68 Camero
Bigstevex4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2015, 03:37 PM   #5
monte0185
Registered User
 
monte0185's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Brighton, TN
Posts: 1,267
Re: 6.2L or 8.1L

True but some of that would be eaten up by the fact im ditching the carb and going fuel infected. Tired of dinking with carb setups.
__________________
A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.

Duct tape is like the force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the world together.
monte0185 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2015, 04:03 PM   #6
crashz
Registered User
 
crashz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: MA
Posts: 207
Re: 6.2L or 8.1L

My 2012 is peppy with or without a load in the back. Hook a trailer to it, and it has me wanting a little more grunt. I typically tow 6000-7000 lbs a few times per year, for a few hundred miles at a time. Total combined weight about 15K. Kind of wish I got the Duramax. but I don't tow that often, and it is perfectly adequate when I do.

This is assuming the 6.0 and the 6.2L engines perform similarly.

If I were building a truck to tow, I'd go 8.1L or Cummins. I'd want the Allison to go with it though. The 4L80E didn't come with the 8.1, unless it was in the van I think.

One word of warning, and this is second hand info at best; but the 8.1L motors seemed to have some oil burning issues. Seems like some guys on other message boards had to rebuild their engines because of excessive oil consumption and piston slap/scuffing. I have not hand any first hand experience with these motors so that could just be rumor or bashing.

What about rebuilding the 454 and adding aftermarket (like Holley) FI? Not really original, but it will give you a strong truck with dependable power for a reasonable-ish price.
__________________
2012 Chevy 2500HD, 6.0L, 6spd auto, 4x4, ECSB
1987 GMC V3500 Dump, 6.2L diesel, TH400
1983 GMC K2500 - awaiting its restoration and Cummins swap.

Last edited by crashz; 04-15-2015 at 04:13 PM.
crashz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2015, 04:13 PM   #7
monte0185
Registered User
 
monte0185's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Brighton, TN
Posts: 1,267
Re: 6.2L or 8.1L

Quote:
Originally Posted by crashz View Post
My 2012 is peppy with or without a load in the back. Hook a trailer to it, and it has me wanting a little more grunt. I typically tow 6000-7000 lbs a few times per year, for a few hundred miles at a time. Total combined weight about 15K. Kind of wish I got the Duramax. but I don't tow that often, and it is perfectly adequate when I do.

This is assuming the 6.0 and the 6.2L engines perform similarly.

If I were building a truck to tow, I'd go 8.1L or Cummins
The 6.0 and 6.2 are very similiar the 6.2 just has a little more power and torque than the 6.0 and its all aluminum if memory serves. Could be mistaken on that one though. 6.2 has about 430 hp from the factory. I have no desire to go cummins or any diesel for that matter. Not that i dont like them its just if i were to go to a diesel id just rebuild the 454 to play with and go buy a new duramax 3500 4x4.

That being said the 8.1 with just a tune on the computer and some added fuel pressure are putting out 450hp and 630ish torque at like 3500 rpm's which ought to pull a darn tank.

I will be pulling the camper 100 miles or so every couple a weekends during the summer and taking the truck to shows as well. So gas mileage is not something i really expect. I just want to make sure the power is there when i need it.
__________________
A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.

Duct tape is like the force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the world together.
monte0185 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2015, 04:25 PM   #8
crashz
Registered User
 
crashz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: MA
Posts: 207
Re: 6.2L or 8.1L

Yeah - I think my 6.0 has 360 Hp in stock form. Can't remember torque. So the 6.2L would have the power advantage.

I get about 14 mpgs when the stars are aligned, empty truck, easy & flat highway driving and no faster than 65 mph. Towing is as low as 8 mpgs.

My truck weighs in at a portly 7500 lbs empty. I have 265/70 R18 tires and 3.73 gears (thought that would help with mileage!!) with the 6L90E auto transmission.

My guess is that either engine will be hovering around the 10 mpg range no matter what. Might as well go for all the grunt you can get.
__________________
2012 Chevy 2500HD, 6.0L, 6spd auto, 4x4, ECSB
1987 GMC V3500 Dump, 6.2L diesel, TH400
1983 GMC K2500 - awaiting its restoration and Cummins swap.
crashz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2015, 04:33 PM   #9
Bigstevex4
Registered User
 
Bigstevex4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Spearfish South Dakota
Posts: 407
Re: 6.2L or 8.1L

Quote:
Originally Posted by crashz View Post
My 2012 is peppy with or without a load in the back. Hook a trailer to it, and it has me wanting a little more grunt. I typically tow 6000-7000 lbs a few times per year, for a few hundred miles at a time. Total combined weight about 15K. Kind of wish I got the Duramax. but I don't tow that often, and it is perfectly adequate when I do.

This is assuming the 6.0 and the 6.2L engines perform similarly.

If I were building a truck to tow, I'd go 8.1L or Cummins. I'd want the Allison to go with it though. The 4L80E didn't come with the 8.1, unless it was in the van I think.

One word of warning, and this is second hand info at best; but the 8.1L motors seemed to have some oil burning issues. Seems like some guys on other message boards had to rebuild their engines because of excessive oil consumption and piston slap/scuffing. I have not hand any first hand experience with these motors so that could just be rumor or bashing.

What about rebuilding the 454 and adding aftermarket (like Holley) FI? Not really original, but it will give you a strong truck with dependable power for a reasonable-ish price.
My 02 Gmc 2500 had the 8.1 and the Alison went through Alison to get a over drive cutout switch.
__________________
83 c10 long Box Daily Driver
90 Jimmy parked
98 Road King/ 06 Road Glide
In memorium
63 impala SS/ 65 Chevy Panel
65 GMC Short Box/ 68 Camero
Bigstevex4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2015, 09:33 PM   #10
DirtyLarry
Windy Corner of a Dirty Street
 
DirtyLarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pueblo West, Colorado
Posts: 2,926
Re: 6.2L or 8.1L

Dunno why anybody would want an 8.1L
DirtyLarry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2015, 05:49 AM   #11
4x4toy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Southern Md
Posts: 228
Re: 6.2L or 8.1L

I am jealous, that is a nice looking truck. Cant find one for my self to save my ___.
__________________
04 Yukon XL 2500 w/ Quadrasteer
61 Chevy C60, 261 inline six
86 Chevy C20 2wd, Banks 6.2
05 GMC Sierra 2500hd Duramax
4x4toy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2015, 07:12 AM   #12
monte0185
Registered User
 
monte0185's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Brighton, TN
Posts: 1,267
Re: 6.2L or 8.1L

Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyLarry View Post
Dunno why anybody would want an 8.1L
It's your fault I'm even considering this larry!! Lol. I am pretty much convinced to go 8.1 but figured I would consider the 6.2 since they are more plentiful and have a better aftermarket following. But their torque just isn't as much as the 8.1.
__________________
A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.

Duct tape is like the force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the world together.
monte0185 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2015, 06:56 PM   #13
DirtyLarry
Windy Corner of a Dirty Street
 
DirtyLarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pueblo West, Colorado
Posts: 2,926
Re: 6.2L or 8.1L

Quote:
Originally Posted by monte0185 View Post
It's your fault I'm even considering this larry!! Lol. I am pretty much convinced to go 8.1 but figured I would consider the 6.2 since they are more plentiful and have a better aftermarket following. But their torque just isn't as much as the 8.1.
You know, everybody keeps talking about the lack of aftermarket support for the 8.1L but in all reality, what does a person need from the aftermarket?? The engine management system is no different from a Gen III LS and a bone stock 8.1L running a decent tune will easily turn 400 HP and close to, if not more, than 500 lb. ft. of torque. I don’t think a lot of people realize a 400 HP big block “feels” more powerful than a windup 450 HP small block any day just because of the low RPM range where things happen. I personally don’t care for the small block Gen III LS engines that must whipped on all the way to 6000 RPM to get peak power of them. Spinning the hell out of an engine is not achieving useful power in a heavy truck in my opinion. A bone stock 8.1L is making over 355 lb. ft. of torque at 800 RPM straight from GM Powertrain’s product detail. Go look where a 6.2L is making that kind of torque. It will be at least 3,500 RPMs or higher....and if someone really wants to throw away money on aftermarket doodads, any older BBC header will fit the 8.1L and RayLar, CompCams and may many others offer an array of cams for them. I am partial to RayLar and run a RayLar 202 in my Burb. It honks well! It has a date for a Dyno Tune in late May to get the tune dialed in to compensate for the RayLary cam. Anxious to see how it turns out.

The best ,and worst thing, about the 8.1L is nobody knows a damn thing about them.
DirtyLarry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2015, 02:01 PM   #14
GRADYS Performance
Registered User
 
GRADYS Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Columbus, Oh
Posts: 366
Re: 6.2L or 8.1L

My vote would be for the 8.1L.
GRADYS Performance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2015, 02:21 PM   #15
bnoon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Des Moines IA
Posts: 1,250
Re: 6.2L or 8.1L

For a crew dually I would go 8.1 as well. Nothing like 400 foot pounds barely off idle for towing.
__________________
- 1981 Sierra 454, NV4500 swap
- 2006 Z06, 25k miles
- 1973 Nova - Project CarNova Virus on Youtube
bnoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2015, 09:35 AM   #16
hatzie
Moderator
 
hatzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Wentworth, NH
Posts: 4,911
Re: 6.2L or 8.1L

Quote:
Originally Posted by bnoon View Post
For a crew dually I would go 8.1 as well. Nothing like 400 foot pounds barely off idle for towing.
There's no replacement for displacement.
I've seen a handful of 472 & 500 CID caddy engines in these trucks for that same reason.
496CID with modern fuel injection... If I had the 76 to do over I'd go with an 8.1
__________________
1959 M35A2 LDT465-1D SOLD
1967 Dodge W200 B383, NP420/NP201 SOLD
1969 Dodge Polara 500 B383, A833 SOLD
1972 Ford F250 FE390, NP435/NP205 SOLD
1976 Chevy K20, 6.5L, NV4500/NP208 SOLD
1986 M1008 CUCV SOLD
2000 GMC C2500, TD6.5L, NV4500
2005 Chevy Silverado LS 2500HD 6.0L 4L80E/NP263
2009 Impala SS LS4 V8


RTFM... GM Parts Books, GM Schematics, GM service manuals, and GM training materials...Please include at least the year and model in your threads. It'll be easier to answer your questions.
And please let us know if and how your repairs were successful.
hatzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2015, 12:12 PM   #17
monte0185
Registered User
 
monte0185's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Brighton, TN
Posts: 1,267
Re: 6.2L or 8.1L

I have pretty much talked myself into the 8.1 but I did that along time ago. lol I was considering the 6.2 as another option if I cant find a suitable 8.1. I think I have found one though that's still on a burb 2500 chassis. motor trans and everything with very low mileage. now I just have to get my cash together. its got the 4l80 behind it I think that's whats in a burb and if that's the case im gonna add my GV overdrive onto it from my 400 I have now. Probably wont be good for towing other than the underdrive but on just a flat run ought to help with gas mileage a bit.
__________________
A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.

Duct tape is like the force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the world together.
monte0185 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com