The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-08-2016, 05:42 PM   #1
Nima
Blue 67
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Western WA
Posts: 1,169
Mufflers VS Catalytic converters

Hi:
This might be an stupid question but I have to ask. I know catalytic converter are generally more restrictive than mufflers and they can cost some HP and maybe torque, besides I think they are more expensive than mufflers. My truck, being a 1967 and carburated, has this old car smell. I can't get rid of it doesn't matter how much time I have spent on tuning. I wanted to ask if catalytic converter can filter some of that smell?!! If they do, how about replacing my mufflers, which are basic jegs turbo mufflers, with pair of high flow converters? My truck power train is just a basic 350 and 3 speed tranny.
I have a small two car garage and by the time I start the truck and pull it out to let it warm up, I hear the wife that the whole garage smells, and some times it leaks to the house since it is an attached garage.
__________________
1953 GMC 3/4 ton: current project
1967 C20: 5.3 voretc with T5 conversion, 4 wheel 8 lug disc brake
1972 Nova: my 4 door sport sedan! 5.3 voretc + T5 conversion. drivable project, FUN!!
1979 Camaro Z28: 5.3 vortec conversion with build TH350: drivable project, Fun to drive
1992 Camaro RS convertible (Z28 clone): 5.3 conversion with build T5: on going project
2005 Silverado 2500, 4x4 Duramax, original owner
Nima is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2016, 05:57 PM   #2
jdalexa84
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Lampasas, Texas
Posts: 234
Re: Mufflers VS Catalytic converters

Catalytic converters are designed to burn the unburnt fuel in the exhaust gasses. Putting them on could help with your problem. I would keep the mufflers because they serve a different purpose.
jdalexa84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2016, 06:07 PM   #3
Nima
Blue 67
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Western WA
Posts: 1,169
Re: Mufflers VS Catalytic converters

Please correct me if I am wrong, the mufflers are there to muffle the sound and create some level of back pressure. I would guess the converters will do these jobs as well, to some degree.
__________________
1953 GMC 3/4 ton: current project
1967 C20: 5.3 voretc with T5 conversion, 4 wheel 8 lug disc brake
1972 Nova: my 4 door sport sedan! 5.3 voretc + T5 conversion. drivable project, FUN!!
1979 Camaro Z28: 5.3 vortec conversion with build TH350: drivable project, Fun to drive
1992 Camaro RS convertible (Z28 clone): 5.3 conversion with build T5: on going project
2005 Silverado 2500, 4x4 Duramax, original owner
Nima is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2016, 06:14 PM   #4
jdalexa84
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Lampasas, Texas
Posts: 234
Re: Mufflers VS Catalytic converters

To some degree yes but have you ever heard a newer car that has lost the muffler? They are extremely loud. And they have both

Last edited by jdalexa84; 02-08-2016 at 06:41 PM.
jdalexa84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2016, 08:30 PM   #5
special-K
Special Order

 
special-K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,749
Re: Mufflers VS Catalytic converters

Do you back it into the garage? Pulling nose first should help, if you aren't already. Starting any vehicle in the garage is going to fill it with exhaust. I guess your garage floor is pretty level. How about making little ramps to pull the front wheels onto. You could roll it out of the garage, then start. I get fumes if a vehicle (old or new) runs in the driveway with the exhaust aligned with the mudroom door. I just roll forward first.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed"

GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project)
GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling)
Tim

"Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman"

R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~
special-K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2016, 09:00 PM   #6
Steeveedee
Who Changed This?
 
Steeveedee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 10,019
Re: Mufflers VS Catalytic converters

Use an exhaust fan with a timer. If you put on cats, you will not experience all that much restriction or back pressure. Check and see how many GM vehicles came from the factory with dual converters. It was common on '70s Ford products, but back in the day, the only GM vehicle I saw with dual converters was the top of the line 455 Firebird Trans Am.
__________________
~Steven

'70 Chevy 3/4T Longhorn CST 402/400/3.56 Custom Camper

Simi Valley, CA
Steeveedee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2016, 10:10 PM   #7
96blazr
Registered User
 
96blazr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: VA
Posts: 740
Re: Mufflers VS Catalytic converters

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nima View Post
Hi:
This might be an stupid question but I have to ask. I know catalytic converter are generally more restrictive than mufflers and they can cost some HP and maybe torque, besides I think they are more expensive than mufflers. My truck, being a 1967 and carburated, has this old car smell.

Seriously!!?? WTF kinda question is this?? It's a1967, THEY DIDN'T HAVE CATS, NEVER HAD CATS, NEVER USED CATS!! Why would you even think about putting Cats on any vehicle from 1967? Just run your Mufflers, whichever you choose, and be done with it.
__________________
1968 SWB.
GMPP 350/350 Turbo Trans, Edelbrock Performer & Carb. Hedman Hedders, Hooker Aerochambers Mufflers. Tuff Stuff Alternators.

Remember, no matter where you go,
There you are.

Gary
96blazr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2016, 10:23 PM   #8
leddzepp
Moderator
 
leddzepp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Southern Cal
Posts: 19,972
Re: Mufflers VS Catalytic converters

If you read the entire post, he is asking if it will help reduce the exhaust smell.
__________________
1972 C/10 Cheyenne Super SWB. Restored, loaded, slammed.

1968 C/10 50th Anniversary LWB. Unrestored, stock, daily driver/work truck.


RIP ElJay
RIP 67ChevyRedneck
RIP Grumpy Old Man
leddzepp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2016, 11:09 PM   #9
Bigdav160
Registered User
 
Bigdav160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Klein Texas
Posts: 3,852
Re: Mufflers VS Catalytic converters

Catalytic converters don't do anything until they are heated up. I don't think they are going to help the OP's problem.
__________________
My Classics:
'72 K20 Suburban + '65 Dodge Town Wagon
'72 Corvette Roadster +'67 Corvette Roadster
'73 Z-28 Camaro
'63 Ford SWB Uni Pickup
'50 Ford Coupe
Bigdav160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 12:32 AM   #10
El Dorado Jim
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: El Dorado Ca
Posts: 3,374
Re: Mufflers VS Catalytic converters

I really don't know why you would want to waste the money on cats, I am glad I only own '75 and older vehicles here in Ca, so I don't have to run cats or even smog my vehicles
El Dorado Jim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 03:10 AM   #11
Highlander72
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Atascadero, CA
Posts: 80
Re: Mufflers VS Catalytic converters

I hear ya. The exhaust smell didn't bother me when I was a kid, but today's gas is a lot different.
Cats do need to get hot to be effective, I'd run just one up near the engine because of that, then split into duals if you want, or just run a big single.
__________________
'72 C10 Highlander | '69 GTO | '06 VFR800 | '96 XR250
Highlander72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 03:40 AM   #12
'68 Newtricks
Registered User
 
'68 Newtricks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Los Angeles area :(
Posts: 499
Re: Mufflers VS Catalytic converters

I like Special-K's idea of running the truck onto a couple small ramps. Open the garage door, put in neutral, roll out and start. Best way to do it.

If you run cats, they need to be as close to the cylinder heads as possible. Running two small ones at the collector will work best for cutting down on morning smells. The larger cats will take longer to heat up and thus longer to be effective. Neither small or big cats will help contain the smell in the garage, just not enough time for them to heat up.

Do the ramp thing or exhaust fan on a timer. I think you'll be happier with the outcome than changing your exhaust.
__________________
'68 C10 SWB
'85 K30 Blazer
'68 Newtricks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 08:26 AM   #13
special-K
Special Order

 
special-K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,749
Re: Mufflers VS Catalytic converters

Quote:
Originally Posted by 96blazr View Post
Seriously!!?? WTF kinda question is this?? It's a1967, THEY DIDN'T HAVE CATS, NEVER HAD CATS, NEVER USED CATS!! Why would you even think about putting Cats on any vehicle from 1967? Just run your Mufflers, whichever you choose, and be done with it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Dorado Jim View Post
I really don't know why you would want to waste the money on cats, I am glad I only own '75 and older vehicles here in Ca, so I don't have to run cats or even smog my vehicles
If people voluntarily kept their vehicles properly tuned there would be no need for mandatory emissions testing. I don't like the testing any more than anyone else. In fact, I have never owned a vehicle required to go through that, either older or diesel. But...on the '90 Blazer I bought new for my wife, I wanted dual exhaust for the 350. It's what I have always done. My exhaust guy wouldn't do it because the state dept of environment had come down on the state dept of trans for not enforcing the laws. The law reads the exhaust must run same size same design same exit point as factory for that particular engine in that vehicle. They were fining and taking the (emissions) license from violators. I finally found a shop not concerned and had my true dual exhaust using 2 Flowmaster mufflers and 2 Thrush full flow converters run. With the better flowing less restrictive exhaust the Blazer made more power using less throttle while emitting less harmful gases than factory. I reduced the emissions output while breaking the emissions laws.
This got me to thinking why not on an old truck? I came up hating converters, but if they don't hurt performance with the result being cleaner air than what's the harm? This was 25 years ago and I was looking ahead at what they might do about older vehicles emissions in the future. Having my exhaust guy turn down my dual exhaust job sent my mind reeling and that's where it ended up. If keeping these trucks registered required installing catalytic converters I would be willing. If someone wants to do this on their own I say more power to them.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed"

GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project)
GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling)
Tim

"Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman"

R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~
special-K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 09:23 AM   #14
67ChevyRedneck
Hittin E-Z Street on Mud Tires
 
67ChevyRedneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 23,090
Re: Mufflers VS Catalytic converters

I did a little reading on this myself not too long ago (I have a 65 Mustang with the same problem, car runs great, is tuned right, but backing out of the garage in the morning is a little stinky), and the general "consensus" seemed to be that carbureted engines, even properly tuned, just release too much unburnt fuel and would likely burn up a cat. I don't know how true that is or how long it would take, maybe it does, but would take a few years?

The best option would be adding a fuel injection kit and cat to your motor, but last I checked, most kits are still around 2K... for that price it would be LS time.
__________________
Jesse James
1967 C10 SWB Stepside: 350/700R4/3.73
1965 Ford Mustang: 289/T5-5spd/3.25 Trac-Loc
1968 Pontiac Firebird: Project Fire Chicken!
2015 Silverado Double Cab 5.3L Z71
2001 Jeep Wrangler Sport 4.0L 5spd
2020 Chevrolet Equinox Premium 2.0L Turbo
2011 Mustang V6 ~ Wife's ride
American Born, Country by the Grace of God
1967 CST Shop Truck Rebuild!
My 1967 C-10 Build Thread
My Vintage Air A/C Install
Project "On a Dime"
Trying my hand at Home Renovation!
1965 Mustang Modifications!
67ChevyRedneck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 10:28 AM   #15
Nima
Blue 67
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Western WA
Posts: 1,169
Re: Mufflers VS Catalytic converters

Well, thanks for all the posts. I guess making a small ramp would be the fastest and cheapest option while I decide on more permanent solution.
I was also thinking about a fuel injection (TBI, TPI or LS conversion) but the cost of entry is still too high for me.
Thanks again
__________________
1953 GMC 3/4 ton: current project
1967 C20: 5.3 voretc with T5 conversion, 4 wheel 8 lug disc brake
1972 Nova: my 4 door sport sedan! 5.3 voretc + T5 conversion. drivable project, FUN!!
1979 Camaro Z28: 5.3 vortec conversion with build TH350: drivable project, Fun to drive
1992 Camaro RS convertible (Z28 clone): 5.3 conversion with build T5: on going project
2005 Silverado 2500, 4x4 Duramax, original owner
Nima is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 05:51 PM   #16
MARKDTN
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 2,121
Re: Mufflers VS Catalytic converters

You can almost change to fuel injection for what Cats cost. My '83 K20 has dual exhaust with hi-flow cats and no mufflers. I had an '89 IROC with dual cats (California emissions) and ran it for a while with no muffler. Both sound weird. You really need a resonator at least with a Cat. But I agree with above. NO WAY would I voluntarily add Cats to a vehicle that did not require it.

Cost of small-block fuel injection is dropping. I went to the AACA swap meet in Nashville over the weekend. I always carry a TPI to sell, or at least draw people to my table. I was asking $250. There were people reporting buying complete TPI units for $125-150. So cost of entry for TPI is not that high really. Lets say a $150 intake (not from me), $200 rebuilt Bosch injectors, $25 ECM, $100 PROM, $75-100 fuel pump, and a $250 harness. $20 oxygen sensor. Optional $75 VSS, but I would run it. Some fittings and gaskets and air cleaner. You could take some $$ off if you used a 3.1 Corsica or Caviler harness and adapted it (or found a Camaro cheap enough). You might find a tank that had an internal pump or you might use external. You can do the swap in a weekend. I love the way a TPI runs. I have 2 of them running. The visual appeal is awesome. If I was doing a big build I would do LS, but if you have a good running long block small block, TPI is great.
__________________
'83 K20-TPI
'73 C10
'79 C10-ex-diesel(SOLD)
'07 Tahoe(Son driving)
'14 Suburban-DD
'71 C10-current project
MARKDTN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 08:20 PM   #17
Eddie H.
Registered User
 
Eddie H.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Paradise TX USA
Posts: 1,200
Re: Mufflers VS Catalytic converters

Catalytic converters need to warm up for a few minutes before they start working, and even then, they require a very precise fuel/air mixture in order to reduce emissions efficiently.
__________________
"Negative people always seem to have a problem for every solution"
Eddie H. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 08:29 PM   #18
ironroad9c1
Master Hater
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Temple,Tx.
Posts: 402
Re: Mufflers VS Catalytic converters

Yea a cat on a carbed engine would fail pretty quickly due to the amount of unburned fuel in the exhaust.
__________________
1997 C1500 ECSB 4.3/NV3500 8.5 3.42
"This evening, all of you bleeding hearts... why don't just go ahead and hug yourself for the next 20 minutes or so, because there's a really good chance you're gonna be offended".- Captain Owen Honors
ironroad9c1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 09:17 PM   #19
Grumpy old man
Senior Member
 
Grumpy old man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Gods country East,Tn
Posts: 8,545
Re: Mufflers VS Catalytic converters

The whole emissions/inspection saga is political BS when you consider many states don't even bother . And when you consider all the other countries (China) that are still belching poisonous contaminants into the atmosphere so we can buy a reproduction mirror for $19.95 are we really kidding anyone ? Look at Flint with leaded water ...There are a lot of people down stream that no one is even talking about yet ...
Grumpy old man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 09:53 PM   #20
davepl
Registered User
 
davepl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 6,332
Re: Mufflers VS Catalytic converters

Quote:
Originally Posted by 96blazr View Post
Seriously!!?? WTF kinda question is this?? It's a1967, THEY DIDN'T HAVE CATS, NEVER HAD CATS, NEVER USED CATS!! Why would you even think about putting Cats on any vehicle from 1967? Just run your Mufflers, whichever you choose, and be done with it.
I'll answer that, because I contemplated it.

They never had stereo radios either, but people add those.

Old cars smell. They just do. My clothes smell like gas, my hair smells like gas, and my truck doesn't run rich. It's simply because they're inefficient and a lot of unburned fuel comes out at idle.

I don't care about the emissions on a "pleasure" vehicle like this, it's not about that. Just the smell.

You may not care. But some wives and girlfriends do.

My concern was that they're -so- much worse than modern engines (primarily the combustion chamber and cam) that there would be too much extra fuel to burn. My '75 Monte Carlo had cats and a carb, so they did build them that way. And it wasn't a computer-controlled Q-jet either, just your basic 2bbl.
__________________
1970 GMC Sierra Grande Custom Camper - Built, not Bought
1969 Pontiac 2+2 427/390 4-speed Coupe
1969 Pontiac 2+2 427/390 4-speed Convertible
davepl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2016, 10:01 PM   #21
Grumpy old man
Senior Member
 
Grumpy old man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Gods country East,Tn
Posts: 8,545
Re: Mufflers VS Catalytic converters

http://www.autonews.com/article/2008...ways-to-comply
Grumpy old man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2016, 12:19 AM   #22
special-K
Special Order

 
special-K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,749
Re: Mufflers VS Catalytic converters

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grumpy old man View Post
The whole emissions/inspection saga is political BS when you consider many states don't even bother . And when you consider all the other countries (China) that are still belching poisonous contaminants into the atmosphere so we can buy a reproduction mirror for $19.95 are we really kidding anyone ? Look at Flint with leaded water ...There are a lot of people down stream that no one is even talking about yet ...
Yeah, I always look to those who are doing a worse job for an example of how to improve myself
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed"

GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project)
GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling)
Tim

"Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman"

R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~
special-K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2016, 12:27 AM   #23
BigRed76
Registered User
 
BigRed76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Loveland, CO
Posts: 1,921
Re: Mufflers VS Catalytic converters

Fuel injection with no cats will do you better than carbureted with cats.
__________________
Zach

1970 Chevrolet Custom Camper K20
1971 GMC Super K2500, 12V/NV4500 swap in progress
1971 Chevrolet Custom C10
1972 Chevrolet Custom Deluxe C20, 5.3/4L60E
1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme, 455/TH400, 3.73 posi
2004 GMC Sierra 2500HD, LB7/Allison, CCSB
2005 GMC Sierra 1500, 5.3/4L60E, CCSB

BigRed76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2016, 08:15 AM   #24
MARKDTN
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 2,121
Re: Mufflers VS Catalytic converters

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigRed76 View Post
Fuel injection with no cats will do you better than carbureted with cats.
I agree!

And to those who said that you can't do carbed with cats-I think you need to look at all American cars from 1975 into the mid to late 80s. The first successful domestic electronic fuel injection was the 1982 Corvette, but many cars didn't get it until much later in the '80s.
__________________
'83 K20-TPI
'73 C10
'79 C10-ex-diesel(SOLD)
'07 Tahoe(Son driving)
'14 Suburban-DD
'71 C10-current project
MARKDTN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2016, 09:39 AM   #25
70cst
Senior Member
 
70cst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: New Madison, Ohio
Posts: 21,337
Re: Mufflers VS Catalytic converters

The smell is part of living with old school rides ...

I luv it
__________________
A husband can be right...or...A husband can be happy.

67-72 Chevy and GMC Trucks...The Classic Truck for the Classic Folk.

1970 CST Two tone green, 402BB, 400 Automatic, Tach, Buckets, AC, AM-FM, Tilt, GM CB, GM 8 Tract, LWB, etc

JOHN 17:3...The better side of "LIFE"


Remember: Everyday is a good day...Some are just gooder!
70cst is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com