The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Engine & Drivetrain

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-03-2005, 05:26 PM   #1
rockman20
"The dude abides"
 
rockman20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 472
Fuel Consumption

Okay, I have a 82 Scottsdale with a 350 that has been bored 60 over with flat top pistons and an extreme offroad cam, edelbrock intake, Rochester carb, headers, dual exhaust (2.5") into flowmasters, and stock HEI distributer.

Why can I no longer get my 12-14 MPG on the interstate? I am at a loss at where my economy went. Truck runs great, just lost a lot of economy. I am down to basically 9 MPG no matter where I drive. In town, off road, or highway. Any suggestions on where to look?
__________________
RockMan

1993 Chevy Silverado C3500 1 ton dually
1994 Honda Civic
1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass S
1953 IH Farmall Super M
New to the fleet:
1992 Subaru Loyal
rockman20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2005, 05:35 PM   #2
cdowns
Senior Member
 
cdowns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: daytonabeach
Posts: 22,956
maybe you should have gotten a cam for mileage if that's what you were lookin for
__________________
71c-10 350/2004r/4:11 lowered3/4 longbed/dead by hurricane

MEANING OF DEATH::::: SOMEBODY ELSE GETS YOUR STUFF

DONT BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU THINK

TAKE MY ADVISE;I DON'T USE IT ANYWAY
cdowns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2005, 05:55 PM   #3
bigarmzz
Registered User
 
bigarmzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Elkins, West Virginia
Posts: 2,542
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockman20
Okay, I have a 82 Scottsdale with a 350 that has been bored 60 over with flat top pistons and an extreme offroad cam, edelbrock intake, Rochester carb, headers, dual exhaust (2.5") into flowmasters, and stock HEI distributer.

Why can I no longer get my 12-14 MPG on the interstate? I am at a loss at where my economy went. Truck runs great, just lost a lot of economy. I am down to basically 9 MPG no matter where I drive. In town, off road, or highway. Any suggestions on where to look?

how big of an extreme energy cam did ya get?

whats the specs of it?

they make several, probably the lower the lift, the better the economy....
__________________
1987 350 TBI lowered 5/7
bigarmzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2005, 06:15 PM   #4
Jason915
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 693
The X-treame cams are ground for great low end torque profile, they are not designed for peak HP numbers so I wouldn't think the cam is the problem. I would check your A/F ratio and make sure your timming is right on. How do your plugs look? Also a .060 overbore is going to use more gas just because the pistons are bigger it's pumping in more air and fuel and its also heavier so more rotating mass. What cylinder heads are you using, stock or larger valve cylinder heads?
__________________
1971 GMC K1500 SWB Fleetside, 4" skyjacker softride and, 14 Bolt FF, HD Dana 44 4.10's

1970 K5 TBI conversion lifted etc SOLD
1968 C20 camper truck SOLD


“To ban guns because criminals use them is to tell the innocent and law-abiding that their rights and liberties depend not on their own conduct, but on the conduct of the guilty and the lawless.” Jeff Snyder
Jason915 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2005, 07:29 PM   #5
bigarmzz
Registered User
 
bigarmzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Elkins, West Virginia
Posts: 2,542
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason915
The X-treame cams are ground for great low end torque profile, they are not designed for peak HP numbers so I wouldn't think the cam is the problem. I would check your A/F ratio and make sure your timming is right on. How do your plugs look? Also a .060 overbore is going to use more gas just because the pistons are bigger it's pumping in more air and fuel and its also heavier so more rotating mass. What cylinder heads are you using, stock or larger valve cylinder heads?

there's one of those xtrem 4x4 cams that has nearly 480 lift.....thats some fuel consumption
__________________
1987 350 TBI lowered 5/7
bigarmzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2005, 10:19 PM   #6
Fred T
Cantankerous Geezer
 
Fred T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bel Aire, KS
Posts: 6,264
Have you recurved your HEI timing? If not, get a set of weight and an adjustable vacuum module. Set your initial timing to around 10* and your total timing to around 36*. It should help your milage a few percent.
__________________
Fred

There is no such thing as too much cam...just not enough engine.
Fred T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2005, 10:25 PM   #7
72MARIO
Registered User
 
72MARIO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Huntsville Ontario Canada
Posts: 4,052
If it makes you feel any better my 84 runs like crap and gets 10mpg at the best.

I would guess the cam is the sucker.
__________________
1968 Suburban numbers matching all original truck now equipped with 6.0/4L80 on Accuair
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=625017
1967 C/20 6.0/4L80 Roofing Truck
1990 V2500 Suburban "Plow Truck"
2005 TAHOE DD
72MARIO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2005, 10:31 AM   #8
Beefcake
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Motor City
Posts: 540
keep your foot off it. Its amazing when you only drive 55mph on the freeway how much you have left in your tank.

I drive like a grandpa now.
__________________
72 GMC Camper Special 2500.

currently has 350/350/14 bolt. 383 and 400 tranny is in the works.
Beefcake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2005, 01:59 PM   #9
Jason915
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 693
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigarmzz
there's one of those xtrem 4x4 cams that has nearly 480 lift.....thats some fuel consumption

Not necessarily higher lift the worse the MPG, several other factors that determine poor mileage. A cam that has .480 lift but lower duration on the intake side and longer duration on the exhaust side will be a reasonably efficient option because the combustion chamber is getting a cleaner mixture. Lobe separation/lobe centerline and duration dictate efficiency more than lobe lift. A cam designed for great low end torque is typically inherently more efficient than other grinds because it will take advantage of the engines power potential at significantly lower RPM’s.
__________________
1971 GMC K1500 SWB Fleetside, 4" skyjacker softride and, 14 Bolt FF, HD Dana 44 4.10's

1970 K5 TBI conversion lifted etc SOLD
1968 C20 camper truck SOLD


“To ban guns because criminals use them is to tell the innocent and law-abiding that their rights and liberties depend not on their own conduct, but on the conduct of the guilty and the lawless.” Jeff Snyder
Jason915 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2005, 04:35 PM   #10
rockman20
"The dude abides"
 
rockman20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 472
Sorry, I was rushed when I did my post. I do not remember the specs on the cam right off hand, but I will see if I can find my sheet somewhere.

The dang thing use to get around 12MPG when I put the fresh engine in. It ran like that for about 2 months and then went down hill. I have put new plugs, wires, even went with a different distributer. I have a Mallory distributer now that I have an adjustable vacuum on. I have my timing set around 6* initial with a total of 32* I could run 10* initial and that will get me to 36* total. I may go ahead and try that.

I haven't pulled the plugs for about a month or two now. I can pull them and see if they are black or white or tan or shot.

I had originally suspected an intake leak so I had redid my intake gasket. But no matter how I drive, I am right around that 9 mark.

I just found it odd that a fresh engine got better mileage then one that is now broke in.
__________________
RockMan

1993 Chevy Silverado C3500 1 ton dually
1994 Honda Civic
1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass S
1953 IH Farmall Super M
New to the fleet:
1992 Subaru Loyal
rockman20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2005, 05:02 PM   #11
MylilBowTie
Right turn Clyde
 
MylilBowTie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 2,911
I would run a compression test or have a leak down test done, the leak down test is the best. That will tell what's going on in the engine.
__________________
1974 C25 LWB: 454 4bbl Carb / TH400 / 3.73
1992 Camaro RS 305 TBI
MylilBowTie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2005, 05:45 PM   #12
cdowns
Senior Member
 
cdowns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: daytonabeach
Posts: 22,956
just wondering/ is this a competition cams extreme series camshaft that you have?? if so on all thier extreme camshafts they provide warnings about using any stock components I.E. lifters rockers springs retainers locks with the cams. did you change all the stuff too or just the cam??
why did you choose that cam ?? was it for the name,or for some other undetermined reason??did you ask any questions on the teck line B-4 getting it or did billie-bob just tell you it was a kick-ass way to go
poor cam and component selection i believe is your problem, you should be able to get alot better gas milage with a better cam choice . i suggest you call a tech line or 2 from different cam companies and tell them what you're looking for and see what they suggest. i'd bet with proper cam and components you could double your mileage and still have a nice power curve
__________________
71c-10 350/2004r/4:11 lowered3/4 longbed/dead by hurricane

MEANING OF DEATH::::: SOMEBODY ELSE GETS YOUR STUFF

DONT BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU THINK

TAKE MY ADVISE;I DON'T USE IT ANYWAY
cdowns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2005, 06:12 PM   #13
Jason915
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 693
Why would you blame the cam when he just said that when the engine was fresh he would get about 12MPG, and now its broke in his milage has reduced?

Rockman20, is this truck an auto or std trans? If it's an auto maybe it's not locking up. If you say that your engine is running just fine as far as power output and you can determine that it's not running pig rich after a plug inspection maybe something else is going on.
__________________
1971 GMC K1500 SWB Fleetside, 4" skyjacker softride and, 14 Bolt FF, HD Dana 44 4.10's

1970 K5 TBI conversion lifted etc SOLD
1968 C20 camper truck SOLD


“To ban guns because criminals use them is to tell the innocent and law-abiding that their rights and liberties depend not on their own conduct, but on the conduct of the guilty and the lawless.” Jeff Snyder
Jason915 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2005, 06:24 PM   #14
cdowns
Senior Member
 
cdowns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: daytonabeach
Posts: 22,956
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason915
Why would you blame the cam when he just said that when the engine was fresh he would get about 12MPG, and now its broke in his milage has reduced?

Rockman20, is this truck an auto or std trans? If it's an auto maybe it's not locking up. If you say that your engine is running just fine as far as power output and you can determine that it's not running pig rich after a plug inspection maybe something else is going on.
well if you read my comments about MATCHING of the components you might understand
__________________
71c-10 350/2004r/4:11 lowered3/4 longbed/dead by hurricane

MEANING OF DEATH::::: SOMEBODY ELSE GETS YOUR STUFF

DONT BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU THINK

TAKE MY ADVISE;I DON'T USE IT ANYWAY
cdowns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2005, 10:08 AM   #15
Jason915
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 693
Ok tell me what is mis matched now that wasn't when the engine was new. He was getting 12 mpg before and now that has been compromised for some reason. I don't understand why you blame cam selection when you don't even know the cam specs it's just not the logical part to put the blame for the resent MPG decrease. It would be different if he said that he swapped cams and now his MPG has gone to hell
__________________
1971 GMC K1500 SWB Fleetside, 4" skyjacker softride and, 14 Bolt FF, HD Dana 44 4.10's

1970 K5 TBI conversion lifted etc SOLD
1968 C20 camper truck SOLD


“To ban guns because criminals use them is to tell the innocent and law-abiding that their rights and liberties depend not on their own conduct, but on the conduct of the guilty and the lawless.” Jeff Snyder
Jason915 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2005, 12:35 PM   #16
cdowns
Senior Member
 
cdowns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: daytonabeach
Posts: 22,956
there's a reason why comp cams warns about NOT using stock components with ALL of thier extreme cams!! stock stuff fails!!! the springs are probablly loosing tempering and closing slowly, and it wouldn't be a big surprise for them to finally snap dropping a valve in turn trashing block and rotating assy
this is all based on the assumption that stock components were retained
__________________
71c-10 350/2004r/4:11 lowered3/4 longbed/dead by hurricane

MEANING OF DEATH::::: SOMEBODY ELSE GETS YOUR STUFF

DONT BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU THINK

TAKE MY ADVISE;I DON'T USE IT ANYWAY
cdowns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2005, 04:54 PM   #17
rockman20
"The dude abides"
 
rockman20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 472
Go ahead and bash me on this one, but I honestly didn't pay much attention to what happened to the engine when it was built.

Mine had gone to crap and it was winter and I needed an engine. I called up a shop about 100 miles away and explained to them what I needed for my truck. I told them that I tow with this vehicle so I will need something with some low range torque. They suggested the cam and told me that is what they usually go with on a tow vehicle. My assumption would be that they would be nice enough to change the other components as well, but honestly I am not sure.

This is the first engine that I have ever had built by someone else and it will be the last. I really do not like not knowing what happened to my engine during assembly.

I will have to take some time to run some tests on this engine now and see what has happened. Live and learn. I was in a rush to get my truck back out on the snowy roads and just did not have the time nor the heated garage to assemble an engine.

Thanks for all the pointers. It gives me some areas to turn to. I am getting a little worried about the cam discussion now though. I will have to see what I can find out.
__________________
RockMan

1993 Chevy Silverado C3500 1 ton dually
1994 Honda Civic
1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass S
1953 IH Farmall Super M
New to the fleet:
1992 Subaru Loyal
rockman20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2005, 09:21 PM   #18
ratfreak888
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 104
maybe try ported vac. vs manifold vac. to the distributor. don't know w/o trying but they do have their diff's.
ratfreak888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2005, 11:12 PM   #19
71_Street_Rod
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 4
Unhappy Mpg

u say that ur truck does well to get 9 to 12 or so i just wish that my 71 would get that much it gets about 6 to 8 and thats without my foot in it
71_Street_Rod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2005, 11:25 PM   #20
FLAGG
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St. Albert, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 89
My 85 Silverado was doing anywhere from 11 to 14 back when I was calculating it out, and that's a 305 with 3.42 gears and a 700R4.
FLAGG is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com