The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1947 - 1959 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-26-2017, 09:20 AM   #1
hillguy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Malmo
Posts: 24
Question 1949 1 ton brakes

can i use a dorman M89160 dual master cylinder to up grade stock drum/drum brake system? do i need 10lb. checks classic parts said it would work do not get any pedal. have 1 inch travel on rod new lines new wheel cylinders no leaks? stumped
hillguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2017, 03:56 PM   #2
dwcsr
Hollister Road Co.
 
dwcsr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 6,134
Re: 1949 1 ton brakes

Quote:
Originally Posted by hillguy View Post
can i use a dorman M89160 dual master cylinder to up grade stock drum/drum brake system? do i need 10lb. checks classic parts said it would work do not get any pedal. have 1 inch travel on rod new lines new wheel cylinders no leaks? stumped
That master is to small. You will get no pedal. You will need a minimum of 1.25".

Are you using a vacuum booster? if not you may want to go to a 1.375 or 37mm bore.

We do a lot of 3/4 and one ton disc brake and master cylinder conversions and I can tell you for fact that 1/2 ton stuff that sold by many will not work on 3/4 and one ton. The cylinder bores are much smaller on a 1/2ton and you end up with the pedal you have. They then will suggest you use a residual valve to keep the pedal up. This is an attempt to fix a bad design and make their part one size fits all. You do not need a residual valve in a properly sized system unless the master is below the IN port of the wheel cylinder. Or in some odd cases you have a quick take up master that was designed for better fuel economy and then only on the drum side.
dwcsr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2017, 07:44 PM   #3
mr48chev
Registered User
 
mr48chev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toppenish, WA
Posts: 15,268
Re: 1949 1 ton brakes

According to this that one is 1-1/4 bore. http://www.rbinc.com/p-15166-m89160.aspx

It would at least need a residual valve on the front side.

I'm wondering if it can move enough fluid to work the drum brakes though.

We are all assuming that you have the brakes properly adjusted all the way around as out of adjustment brake shoes will need a lot more fluid and pedal travel to push them out to the drums.
__________________
Founding member of the too many projects, too little time and money club.

My ongoing truck projects:
48 Chev 3100 that will run a 292 Six.
71 GMC 2500 that is getting a Cad 500 transplant.
77 C 30 dualie, 454, 4 speed with a 10 foot flatbed and hoist. It does the heavy work and hauls the projects around.
mr48chev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2017, 11:30 PM   #4
dwcsr
Hollister Road Co.
 
dwcsr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 6,134
Re: 1949 1 ton brakes

Quote:
Originally Posted by mr48chev View Post
According to this that one is 1-1/4 bore. http://www.rbinc.com/p-15166-m89160.aspx

It would at least need a residual valve on the front side.

I'm wondering if it can move enough fluid to work the drum brakes though.

We are all assuming that you have the brakes properly adjusted all the way around as out of adjustment brake shoes will need a lot more fluid and pedal travel to push them out to the drums.
1.125" is 1-1/8"
1.25" is 1-1/4"
dwcsr is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com