07-21-2012, 07:24 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 5
|
454 vs 496 vs 502
Hey there this will be my first post. I have a project in my head as of now and I cant seem to make up my mind which route i should go for the motor. The project in mind is a K30 crew cab long bed. Truck would be lifted just a little to help clear either 35's or 37's with some trimming, and would be used as a "truck".
Now my main question is what motor should i use? Defiantly want to go BBC , 350-400hp with around 500 ft/lbs of torque. My first reaction is to go with GM Performance HT502 making 340 hp and 512 ft/lbs. But at over $6000 I want to explore my options. Do you guys think a built 454 or a 496 would be a better, more economical option? Are these motors capable producing mild hp while keeping gobs of torque down low where i need it? I would be using a SM465 with a ranger overdrive, while running either 4.10's or 4.56's depending on which tire size I go. Thanks for reading, I'm a total beginner when it comes to gas motors. |
07-21-2012, 09:56 PM | #2 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lewis County, WA
Posts: 1,523
|
Re: 454 vs 496 vs 502
Quote:
|
|
07-21-2012, 10:41 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 5
|
Re: 454 vs 496 vs 502
Its rated around 420 ft/lbs. Keep in in mind SM465 is only rated at 465ftlbs and lives behind healthy V8's. There is a guy who has one that lives behind a cummins 6bt for over 100,000 miles. Im not too concerned.
Also its worth noting that whichever motor I go with, will be fuel injected. |
07-21-2012, 10:47 PM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: El Campo, Tx
Posts: 1,246
|
Re: 454 vs 496 vs 502
I had a similar question and was thinking about buying a 502 but ended up building a 535 with parts from Competition Products in Wisconsin for only a little more and it makes 666T and 633HP. I would at least check those guys out. 502 is a great motor because of the big bore but if you don't really care about HP and are more worried about torque I would think a 496 would be great and be lot cheaper. Could be wrong on some of this tho
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
72 Chevy blue LWB, 99% original Oklahoma truck, 28,000 miles 72 Chevy SWB: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=486626 (Attempt/Mistake #2) 2003 Harley Davidson Dyna Superglide with 2007 Street Bob front end 2000 Ford F350 Powerstroke 4WD CCLB, 310,000 miles running great (STOLEN St. Patricks Day 2014 AND NEVER RECOVERED) 2002 Ford F250 Powerstroke 4WD CCLB (To replace stolen one) Hook em Horns!!! |
07-21-2012, 10:51 PM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Perry, Oklahoma
Posts: 157
|
Re: 454 vs 496 vs 502
Depends on what your plans are down the road IMO.
Dollar for dollar a 496 is going to be hard to beat. Throw in a cam with similar specs to the HT502 cam and a set of 781's or 049's and it's going to pull like a tractor. The 502 would give you way more options for adding cubes down the road, but no matter how you slice it, its gonna be pretty costly. Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
85 Scottsdale LWB 383 227/235 105 lsa Howards Roller TH350 by Jakes Performance, Sanger TX |
07-21-2012, 11:08 PM | #6 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 5
|
Re: 454 vs 496 vs 502
Quote:
|
|
07-22-2012, 08:16 AM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: El Campo, Tx
Posts: 1,246
|
Re: 454 vs 496 vs 502
Only thing that I have wondered about is the long term reliability of a 496? That long crank messes with your rod ratio and longer cranks don't last as long. Or the bearings at least.
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
72 Chevy blue LWB, 99% original Oklahoma truck, 28,000 miles 72 Chevy SWB: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=486626 (Attempt/Mistake #2) 2003 Harley Davidson Dyna Superglide with 2007 Street Bob front end 2000 Ford F350 Powerstroke 4WD CCLB, 310,000 miles running great (STOLEN St. Patricks Day 2014 AND NEVER RECOVERED) 2002 Ford F250 Powerstroke 4WD CCLB (To replace stolen one) Hook em Horns!!! |
07-22-2012, 06:12 PM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: ALTON, IL.
Posts: 98
|
Re: 454 vs 496 vs 502
go with a 454, even a mild 454 will give you the power levels you want
|
07-22-2012, 06:23 PM | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: hyrum utah
Posts: 45
|
Re: 454 vs 496 vs 502
the 496/8.1L is a very reliable motor and has been ran in high rpm marine aps. for many years and also in the 01-06(07 classic) GM 2500hd-3500 trucks flawlessly, atleast all the ones i know anyway. my brothers 03 chev 8.1 has over 200k on it and the only thing engine related he's ever had to replace was the water pump at like 180k. i dont know the difference between the factory 8.1l and say a 496 crate motor but if the crate motor is as good as the factory engine i wouldnt hesitate on a 496. you could probably pick up a wrecked truck with the 8.1l for about the same as a crate motor but then you'd have all the electrical for the efi, and also either an allison auto or a ZF6 6-speed to go with it. or find a used 8.1l engine for around a grand and give it a rebuild and some goodies and still probably be cheaper than a crate motor. the 8.1l that came in the gm trucks was rated at 340hp/455tq and with a raylar cam and heads and a good set of longtubes i've seen guys make well over 500hp. in my opinion the 8.1l was the best torque/towing gas engine ever put in a factory truck.
|
07-23-2012, 11:33 AM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Lanc Co PA
Posts: 226
|
Re: 454 vs 496 vs 502
I'm just starting to finish my 496. I'll have alittle over $4000 in mine. So, it's not to terrible. I hope to have atleast 550hp oit of mine. I'm running 781 heads with a gasket match and bowl blend with a gasket matched Torker 2 intake. The machine shop said I'll have torque monster.
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
1987 R10 Pump Gas 496/TH375 Best 1/4 pass to date 60' 1.49 1/4 10.93 MPH 120 |
07-23-2012, 01:54 PM | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: El Campo, Tx
Posts: 1,246
|
Re: 454 vs 496 vs 502
I thought that the factory 8.1 liter had a larger bore and shorter stroke (than a stroked 454/496) thereby giving it more reliable higher RPM capabilities and in the process unshrouding the valves. Am I incorrect in this?
__________________
72 Chevy blue LWB, 99% original Oklahoma truck, 28,000 miles 72 Chevy SWB: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=486626 (Attempt/Mistake #2) 2003 Harley Davidson Dyna Superglide with 2007 Street Bob front end 2000 Ford F350 Powerstroke 4WD CCLB, 310,000 miles running great (STOLEN St. Patricks Day 2014 AND NEVER RECOVERED) 2002 Ford F250 Powerstroke 4WD CCLB (To replace stolen one) Hook em Horns!!! |
07-23-2012, 04:30 PM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: hyrum utah
Posts: 45
|
Re: 454 vs 496 vs 502
I'm quite positive the factory 8.1 had the longer stroke to get more torque, i thought i read it somewhere on a gm site. i'll see if i can find the info again just to be sure.
|
07-23-2012, 04:50 PM | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: hyrum utah
Posts: 45
|
Re: 454 vs 496 vs 502
this is what i read-
The Vortec 8100 (RPO L18) is a V8 truck engine. It is a redesigned Chevrolet Big-Block engine and was introduced with the 2001 full-size pickup trucks. It is an all-iron engine (block and heads) with two valves per cylinder. It retains the same bore centers as the old 7.4 L big-blocks, but stroke was upped by 9.4 mm (0.4 in) to reach 8.1L (496cuin) for a total of 107.95 mm (4.3 in) bore and 111 mm (4.4 in) stroke. Power output ranges from 325 hp (242 kW) to 550 hp (410 kW) and torque from 455 lb·ft (617 N·m) to 690 lb·ft (936 N·m). Vortec 8100s were built in Tonawanda, New York. The Vortec 8100 is the engine used in the largest Uhaul, their 26-foot (7.9 m) truck. GM stopped installing big block V-8's in the Silverado HD trucks, when the GMT-800 series was discontinued in 2007. 8100 marine engines range from 400 to 600 hp (447 kW) and come with a stand-alone Engine Control Module (ECM). The last L18 was manufactured in December 2009. Important differences between the Vortec 8100 and older big blocks include a changed firing order (1-8-7-2-6-5-4-3), a new 18-bolt head bolt pattern, different symmetrical intake ports, different oil pan rails and the use of metric threads throughout the engine. The fuel-injection system for the Vortec 8100 is nearly identical to that used on Gen III engines, right down to the fuel and spark tables in the ECU.[25] Last edited by vern650; 07-23-2012 at 05:14 PM. |
07-23-2012, 10:28 PM | #14 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Maple Valley, WA
Posts: 1,913
|
Re: 454 vs 496 vs 502
Quote:
__________________
Custom Painter/Restoration Specialist 1965 GMC 3/4 Ton LB SOLD? 1964 Chevy El Camino in full restoration 1991 Chevy S10 288K+ miles 2nd Owner SOLD 2020 RAM 1500 Warlock |
|
07-23-2012, 11:03 PM | #15 |
MOTORHEAD!
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Devon AB, Canada
Posts: 849
|
Re: 454 vs 496 vs 502
__________________
82 GMC High Sierra VortecPro 496 12 Bolt, 3.42's AFR 265 Holley 850 Performer RPM Air Gap Hooker 2455's TCI Turbo 400 Super Street Fighter TRRC 12 Bolt Eaton Posi Mark Williams Axles Cal-Tracs Hoosier 30x10.5 Radial Slick Full weight long box pickup Current best- 11.33@117mph |
07-24-2012, 11:58 AM | #16 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: El Campo, Tx
Posts: 1,246
|
Re: 454 vs 496 vs 502
I stand corrected. A 496 has a 4.25 inch stroke if i remember correctly. My 535 has a 4.5 inch stroke. Heck I am with you then, I would do the 8.1 liter if the stand alone fuel injection wasn't TOOO pricy. Would surely be less than aftermarket fuel injecting a originally carbed stroked 454. Plus you would have all the serpentine everything and better seals and gaskets that do not leak nearly as easily. I know where 4 of these engines are at this very second that range from 50,000 miles to 150,000. And they aren't that expensive.
__________________
72 Chevy blue LWB, 99% original Oklahoma truck, 28,000 miles 72 Chevy SWB: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=486626 (Attempt/Mistake #2) 2003 Harley Davidson Dyna Superglide with 2007 Street Bob front end 2000 Ford F350 Powerstroke 4WD CCLB, 310,000 miles running great (STOLEN St. Patricks Day 2014 AND NEVER RECOVERED) 2002 Ford F250 Powerstroke 4WD CCLB (To replace stolen one) Hook em Horns!!! |
07-24-2012, 12:35 PM | #17 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: San Diego, Escondido, California, Del Dios Hwy
Posts: 268
|
Re: 454 vs 496 vs 502
No words can describe it but fun in my buddies Chevelle.
|
07-24-2012, 01:02 PM | #18 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Lanc Co PA
Posts: 226
|
Re: 454 vs 496 vs 502
Quote:
__________________
1987 R10 Pump Gas 496/TH375 Best 1/4 pass to date 60' 1.49 1/4 10.93 MPH 120 |
|
07-24-2012, 04:49 PM | #19 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 5
|
Re: 454 vs 496 vs 502
I would like to go crate motor, don't want to deal with the headaches of swapping a modern motor in. I think I will start talking to some engine builders about their thoughts on a 496 with 375-400 Hp and as much torque as they can give me. Like a said before I dont want anything crazy, any more power will get me into trouble
|
07-25-2012, 07:31 AM | #20 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Lanc Co PA
Posts: 226
|
Re: 454 vs 496 vs 502
You'll make 375-400hp easily out of a 496. You'll also have torque out the a$$ too.
__________________
1987 R10 Pump Gas 496/TH375 Best 1/4 pass to date 60' 1.49 1/4 10.93 MPH 120 |
07-25-2012, 07:42 AM | #21 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Ruskin Florida
Posts: 4,538
|
Re: 454 vs 496 vs 502
Nice! 66?
__________________
70 swb 4x4 406sbc 700r4 203/205 d60/14blt locker yadda yadda http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...88#post6935688 Yeller 72 Blazer 2wd conversion project "No Daggum Money" http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=550804 LS1-T56 3.73 LSD super budget build Blanco-2014 Sierra SWB https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=810350 |
07-25-2012, 01:58 PM | #22 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: San Diego, Escondido, California, Del Dios Hwy
Posts: 268
|
Re: 454 vs 496 vs 502
I am not sure.
|
07-26-2012, 07:49 AM | #23 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Ruskin Florida
Posts: 4,538
|
Re: 454 vs 496 vs 502
Yep. One year only..1966. My first and second car. 1967 was kinda like it.
__________________
70 swb 4x4 406sbc 700r4 203/205 d60/14blt locker yadda yadda http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...88#post6935688 Yeller 72 Blazer 2wd conversion project "No Daggum Money" http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=550804 LS1-T56 3.73 LSD super budget build Blanco-2014 Sierra SWB https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=810350 |
07-28-2012, 04:54 PM | #24 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Kansas
Posts: 357
|
Re: 454 vs 496 vs 502
I have a low budget 496 with 781 heads, pump gas, good torque and great street manners! So far no major complaints.
Posted via Mobile Device |
07-29-2012, 02:24 AM | #25 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 5
|
Re: 454 vs 496 vs 502
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|