|
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-15-2012, 01:02 PM
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: hanceville alabama
Posts: 268
|
67 rcsb vs 99 rcsb both same drivetrain?
So im trying to do some guessing and figuring out to do a comparision. Most of this will rely on your opinion and prolly what youve seen. Say both trucks have the 5.3/ 4l60e and both are running the same size tire and gear ratio. They run on a 1/4 mile track. Who wins? how bad? I know there is a weight difference of prolly 700lbs,buy how is weight distrabution and will aero dynamics take effect for those 15 seconds?
|
|
|
|
12-17-2012, 10:17 AM
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sunny, Florida, some might call it South Alabama
Posts: 834
|
Re: 67 rcsb vs 99 rcsb both same drivetrain?
I would think the 99 would be a little quicker. Due to the better suspension those truck have. By a little quicker I would think about half a truck faster.
__________________
Just sold my C10...sad day... Looking for a 1972 Blazer to hopefully fill the hole in my heart. |
|
|
|
|
12-18-2012, 02:34 AM
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: hanceville alabama
Posts: 268
|
Re: 67 rcsb vs 99 rcsb both same drivetrain?
Really, i was actually thinking the weight reduction would seal the deal and make the c10 the winner. Im curious lol
|
|
|
|
|
12-18-2012, 08:07 AM
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 10-Uh-See
Posts: 5,609
|
Re: 67 rcsb vs 99 rcsb both same drivetrain?
Pending traction and tune, the lighter vehicle will most likely win, but there are other varibles that can come into play.
One of the biggest factors is the tune.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
