The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-28-2003, 12:53 PM   #1
yooper
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: yoop
Posts: 54
question

what do you all think a truck similiar to this

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...408126833&rd=1

with a fuel injected motor and an automatic with overdrive would get for gas milage.

The reason I ask is i'm getting sick of seeing my 98 GMC full size extended cab loose value every day. I figure I could build something like the one above but put a late model motor and tranny in it and have a truck that is just as reliable and just as efficient as my truck.

The good thing would be is it would hold its value. The reason I bought my 98 was it was reliable and efficient. I cant determine any reason why an old one couldnt be built the same way

Plus I think 71, 72 SWB 4X4's are sweet as hell.

thanks for the input
yooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2003, 01:15 PM   #2
Blue68
Registered User
 
Blue68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Frisco, Tx, USA
Posts: 606
I love fuel economy questions. Sooo many variables and opinions. In order to get a fairly accurate, or at least best case, estimate, I turn to the current chevy trucks for examples. They have some of the most up to date technology for FI at a reasonable price. Lo and behold, a 6 bangin' Z71 (4x4) gets all of 14/18 mpg. Both V8 versions get about the same. I would suspect you could expect similar results. NOW there are always the variables of your foot, your tire size and axle ratios to take into account as well. The new 4x4 with a v8 have 3.73 or 4.10.

Your mileage may vary.
__________________
http://home.comcast.net/~r.landrum/w...tos.html-.html

'68 C-10 LWB, '98 Z-71 350 w/accessories (Serpentine), Edelbrock Performer, Edelbrock 1405 (600cfm) carb, GM HEI, CompCam Extreme 4x4 roller cam, Thorley Headers, Carter Electric Fuel Pump, Vintage Air, 700r4, 3.73, disc brakes and power steering upgrades.
Blue68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2003, 01:16 PM   #3
1970 CST Short Wide
Senior Moment
 
1970 CST Short Wide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pittsburg Ca
Posts: 4,046
Thats a NICE lookin Truck. Buy that one and Drive it
__________________
1970 CST LS 1 6 speed Ford 9 inch Detroit Tru Track, Dakota Didgital, Vintage Air, QA1 Coil Overs Front & Rear Lots of FUN
2013 GMC PU, Oldest Son
71 GMC LWB. QA1 Suspension, Angry SB. Youngest Son
2019 GMC Diesil Dually. Youngest Son
2017 Toyota SUV Daughters car
2018 Traverse , Wife’s Ride
Pittsburg Ca
94565
1970 CST Short Wide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2003, 02:17 PM   #4
cdowns
Senior Member
 
cdowns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: daytonabeach
Posts: 22,956
i would think with the big tires and all something like that with a modern engine and tranny would get about 10-12mpg
__________________
71c-10 350/2004r/4:11 lowered3/4 longbed/dead by hurricane

MEANING OF DEATH::::: SOMEBODY ELSE GETS YOUR STUFF

DONT BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU THINK

TAKE MY ADVISE;I DON'T USE IT ANYWAY
cdowns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2003, 02:24 PM   #5
Hutch
Registered User
 
Hutch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Grapevine, Tx.
Posts: 2,140
I would like to see the vin.
Looks like the paint on the cowl under the hood it was originally medium blue.
From the size of the master cylinder it may have drums all the way around.
I think that for $8500 you would not want a conversion.
Regardless of the price
That is a great looking truck.

Probably 10 to 12 mpg

Have fun
__________________
John Hutchison
Grapevine,Texas

68 1/2 t swb
68 Mustang
69 Jaguar
71 1/2 t swb
88 Supra CompTs6m
93 Escort GT
2005 Corolla XRS
Hutch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2003, 02:25 PM   #6
yooper
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: yoop
Posts: 54
My 98 has a small suspension lift and 285/75/16's. The truck (with me in it) weighs about 5500 lbs. I get 17-18 on the highway.

I figure the old ones couldnt be any heavier. So with similiar tires and axle ratios with a fuel injected motor out of a late model automobile, in theory they would be similiar mileage.

Aerodynamics shouldnt be much different. the front of my truck is kinda shaped like the side of a barn anyways.
yooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2003, 12:49 AM   #7
bpmcgee
Registered User
 
bpmcgee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 2,181
Re: question

Quote:
Originally posted by yooper

The reason I ask is i'm getting sick of seeing my 98 GMC full size extended cab loose value every day. I figure I could build something like the one above but put a late model motor and tranny in it and have a truck that is just as reliable and just as efficient as my truck.
Yooper,
That's EXACTLY my thinking! I'm going to be replacing my 98 ricerburner with a 71 blazer. But what Blue68 says is right -- practically impossible to guess. I know I was able to get 15 mph on the highway with a 1974 1/2 ton 2wd. How does this translate to another truck? No idea.
I think, though, just the fact that there are less parts implies that it will be more reliable. So even if the mpg is less, that can be partially offset.

Have fun!

Brian
bpmcgee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2003, 01:17 AM   #8
Stroker
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Moore, Ok
Posts: 1,149
I agree a RamJet 350 crate motor and an overdrive tranny should be nearly as efficient as the new trucks, maybe a bit better. Go for it.....Stroker
__________________
72 SWB parts and pieces
Oklahoma
Stroker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2003, 01:01 PM   #9
Dreaminator
Dreaminator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Broken Arrow, Oklahoma
Posts: 156
We have been playing with this a bit too. We figure a 4400 pound truck with a 3.77 posi running 30 inch tires with a Gear Vendor OD (OD = about 2.7) running BB with about 400hp should post about 16-17 mpg. Without the OD it runs ab 12-13 at steady 2300rpms. The GVOD will bolt to TH400 with shift kits and 2000rpm torque converter. We further believe we will have to drive about 65K to break even @$1.75 a gallon. That assumes $2700.00 for GVOD and modified drive shaft. To cover a stock 700 GMOD we're estimating about 23K to break even. If I have learned anything about this build out it is to have a concept and plan in place BEFORE you grind. Good luck.
__________________
The Dreaminator

Daily Driver 1971 Cheyenne 10 Lwb Tilt/Tac 402 .030 TH400.
Dreaminator is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com