03-05-2017, 11:10 AM | #26 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: South East Ohio
Posts: 644
|
Re: NV4500 LD or HD
Quote:
I have the (early) shorter GM NV4500 without the vibration dampener. '93 I believe with 35 spline at the yoke. It's what I have been able to find and it's what I plan to work with. My intent is to upgrade as much as necessary to have a clean, dependable trans. I'll post some pics of it later but for now I have a question (or two) concerning the top cover. Mine is the round, bottle style cover and I would like to upgrade the cover for the smoother shifting characteristics I have been reading about. I do not know if I can put the later square style top cover on it to get the added advantage of the better shift. Perhaps it would be a direct swap or possibly require some modification to accomplish. Could someone please advise me on this? I see top cover assemblies on line that state "for 98 and up" or "for 95 and up" but I wonder if that is only because the cover was originally designed for those years or perhaps it actually works on other years also. |
|
03-05-2017, 01:15 PM | #27 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: South East Ohio
Posts: 644
|
Re: NV4500 LD or HD
|
03-05-2017, 01:28 PM | #28 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Carlos, Ca.
Posts: 3,048
|
Re: NV4500 LD or HD
Hey Richard, as far as swapping shift covers, I have never done it myself. I met a transmission guy from Redding who used to work at Bayshore Truck in South City here and he had a little side business converting the shift covers. I had just happened to talk to him for a while about it and it did sound very interesting. He had said that as long as the shift tower hadnt worn, they shifted fine. When they wore is when they started dragging the shift forks and getting notchy. Mine has always shifted pretty smooth.
As far as smoother shifting, this is just what I have heard on the forum. I haven't been able to compare them side by side. If you look through Dirty Larry's builds that involved the 4500, he details the differences pretty well. For my purposes, the early 4500 shifting is great. Huge improvement over the 465s that I had in the '64, the Blazer and the '76 CC Dually. The improvement over the 465 shifting is night and day for me. As for streetability, Id still like to go with the later version with the higher (5 something to 1) 1st gear. I seldom use 1st these days even when Im towing and I don't crawl the truck so the 6.3:1 isn't justified for me. It does work well for crawling in Bay Area traffic though. Overall, Im very happy with this transmission. No complaints other than user errors and lack of research on my part. If I had to do it over again though, knowing what I know now, Id have gone with the later transmission and probably saved the money to do a new one or rebuilt one with a warranty. I got mine for a great price on CL but paid in the end BC I had to replace all syncros, 3rd gear and a couple of bearings. The PO used the wrong oil. Had I done my due diligence,I might have saved myself a few bucks and may have bought the transmission that suited me better to begin with.
__________________
Chris '63 k15 long step Vortec 7.4 - L29 Blackbear tune, Five 0 Motorsports injectors, Chris Straub Cam, NV4500, divorced 205 52" front and 63" rear spring swap D44 / 14bff - disc axles Milemarker 9K and 10.5K hydraulic winches 63" & B52 Spring Install http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...ng+swap+thread NV4500 Reverse Build Thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=reverse+build L29 - 7.4 Vortec Build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...&highlight=L29 |
03-05-2017, 01:49 PM | #29 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: South East Ohio
Posts: 644
|
Re: NV4500 LD or HD
Quote:
I know that it may save me time effort and money in the big picture to get a rebuilt with a warranty. Great advise. I am intent on learning the inner workings of these things though and certain to learn from some errors along the way. I think I can muddle my way through a rebuild with satisfactory results, it's the swapping of parts that's difficult to nail down. Also, this trans (pics posted above) isn't easy for me to identify precisely. It appears that it isn't an original '93 but a factory replacement.. There is a code stamped onto one corner of the trans that reads "CRE17721" which I believe is a factory replacement for the original '93. Also, in the picture I posted, the shaft has been measured at the locations shown as 1.506, which (if I understand correctly) is the larger diameter used in later transmissions. I think those lands measured 1.44 on the original '93 trans. So it may be the case that I do have a factory replacement for the '93, but with some updated parts. These measurements are difficult to look up on the net. Most info says "longer, shorter, bigger, smaller..." but that has limited usefulness. I could use some hard specs. |
|
03-05-2017, 01:57 PM | #30 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Carlos, Ca.
Posts: 3,048
|
Re: NV4500 LD or HD
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=559549
Hey Richard, I just remembered this one. Its from 4 years ago but should help a little. Look for the book from Quad 4x4.
__________________
Chris '63 k15 long step Vortec 7.4 - L29 Blackbear tune, Five 0 Motorsports injectors, Chris Straub Cam, NV4500, divorced 205 52" front and 63" rear spring swap D44 / 14bff - disc axles Milemarker 9K and 10.5K hydraulic winches 63" & B52 Spring Install http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...ng+swap+thread NV4500 Reverse Build Thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=reverse+build L29 - 7.4 Vortec Build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...&highlight=L29 |
03-05-2017, 02:03 PM | #31 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: South East Ohio
Posts: 644
|
Re: NV4500 LD or HD
Quote:
Now at least I can ask questions more specific to my application. Many thanks for the help. |
|
05-14-2017, 04:58 PM | #32 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Etowah, TN
Posts: 210
|
Re: NV4500 LD or HD
Quote:
The NV4500 Guys Running these Trans all switched to 15W40 vs 5w30 -10w30 Oil & Some also Over Filled . . |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|