05-28-2017, 11:02 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Vinton, Va.
Posts: 473
|
350 head ?'s
I've got a 1989 completely rebuilt 350 engine. (Center valve cover bolts). It's .030 0ver. It was rebuilt by PO. I pulled one head just to be sure. Intake valves measure darn near 2" Like 1 15/16. Hey I'm a carpenter not a machinist!!! My book says this is a truck motor that was rated at 210 HP. I know it was fuel injected, but that's gone so I plan on getting an intake since I've already got a good 650 carb. Why so little hp ? Anyway, I've got a chance to buy a set of dbl hump heads that have been maged, decked, new everything. For $500. I know that's a SMOKIN' price!! What are they worth ? 69 cc on comb. chamber. 202 intakes, hardened seats, even has roller rockers. Questions are 1- will they bolt up to my 89 350? 2- Owner says 69 cc would give me high 9's to 10.0 compression ratio, with stock pistons and stock ht. deck. Is that accurate and is that surpassing the 93 octane threshold? I know it's close for cast heads. Casting # 3947041 - my book list that as 69 vette heads or 300 hp Camaro,Nova, Chevelle. How much power/hp would these heads be over my 89 heads? Worth the cost? Thanks for any/all replies.
|
05-28-2017, 11:33 AM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Safford,AZ
Posts: 3,613
|
Re: 350 head ?'s
The 210 is "net" horsepower not "gross". If you were to dyno it with a carb you would probably get close to 260-270hp. There are powertrain losses until you get to the rwhp (rear wheel horsepower).
These engines have a swirl in the chamber to promote torque to 4000 rpm while hp suffers. Hp is a formula Formula (RPM * T) / 5252=HP, where RPM is the engine speed, T is the torque, and 5,252 is rpms per second Since most HP happens over 5000 rpm, that is why it is rated so low in these motors. The "swirl" stalls at 4000, not allowing HP to build. What is your real goal with this motor? There is no way I personally would by camel hump heads when new vortecs are just a little more. |
05-28-2017, 11:54 AM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Vinton, Va.
Posts: 473
|
Re: 350 head ?'s
Goal is to have a good running sunday only driver on pump gas. Rebuilding/ restoring a 68 swb. Just gonna keep old 3 speed (till I break it!!) tranny for now, then who knows, maybe just a 4 speed muncie on the floor. Of course overdrive would be nice, but that's dreaming. But I am a product of the 50-60's so power is a must. I've got a 66 GTO w/sligthly built 455 ci. but still iron heads, to compare "power". I don't need that 450 HP or so, but I can't settle for 200 either. It's gotta have a little cam/ sound and be able to get out of it's own way!! I know that's vauge but hopefully u get my drift.
|
05-29-2017, 09:29 PM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: greensboro nc
Posts: 673
|
Re: 350 head ?'s
IMO and 2 cents it worth. Bypass the old head hop up deal Normally cost more t han worth and borderline cost of new and way improved heads,Heads will make or break power level.
As for cam. I have had great luck with the Edlebrock combo's. Performer Rpm setup has great sound and power.Now if going to tow it might be over edge w/o gearing and OD would be extra nice there.Comp 268 to 274 XE cams would be next choice. Throw on good headers and free flowing exgaust and you should be rocking. As for compression 10:1 not problem 10.5 tuned real well work great.Any more and pushing luck. For little you gain I would call 10 the high side. 400 to 425 hp Is not real hard with sbc.
__________________
Only the stupid know too much to learn something new. |
05-30-2017, 07:49 AM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Vinton, Va.
Posts: 473
|
Re: 350 head ?'s
My motor has the stock heads for a 1989 350. Are these any good for what I am looking for? They are totally rebuilt and ready to to. I bought a rebuilt longblock. It was cheap. Also, my sisters boyfriend gave me this- New in box, never installed. Not even opened. Comp Cams Magnum Hyd. cam kit. K12-212-2. Cam,lifters,seals, timing chain, even springs in kit. Specs are- 280/280 advertised duration, 230/230 @ .050. 480/480 lift. lobe sep. 110. Says it fits 67-2002 350. I haven't pulled the cam out of the rebuilt engine yet but I would guess it's a stock equivalent. Not planning on towing with this truck. So here's the bottom line question- so far- If I use my heads and this cam, what kinda power will I get? Or should I bite the bullet with different heads ? I know heads are the key here. Maybe just mill heads to get desired comp. ratio. It's gotta be pretty lame for a 1989 engine. I would think. Again though, I need 0-60 torque for around town performance, not high end HP. No drag strip for this old truck. Just a very good running Sunday driver. Note- Wife will want Vintage A/C in the future I'm sure. What would you do ? NOTE-Pulled one head. I've got .110 between top of flat top piston and block.
|
05-30-2017, 08:57 AM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: greensboro nc
Posts: 673
|
Re: 350 head ?'s
Piston is .110 below deck? Sure it was TDC ? .011 maybe?
__________________
Only the stupid know too much to learn something new. |
05-30-2017, 12:28 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Vinton, Va.
Posts: 473
|
Re: 350 head ?'s
You were right to ? my measurement.,sir!!!! I was measureing from center of piston , not outter "ring" of piston, which is the hightest point. Sorry about that. How about .052 or .053? Hard for me to hold everything square and straight with the tools I am using.
Last edited by panhead59; 05-30-2017 at 12:48 PM. |
05-30-2017, 07:27 PM | #8 | |
driving is in my blood
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mesa AZ
Posts: 5,690
|
Re: 350 head ?'s
Factory intakes are 1.94"
Quote:
__________________
-78 c10 short/step: 388cid, M20, 5/5 drop, lots more. Playtoy and first vehicle. -98 c1500 x-cab: 5.7L, 17" rims, 5/6 drop, flowmaster, helper bags,NBS rear disk brakes. -02 Suburban 4x4: leveled front -CBR600F4i, CBR600RR, CBR1000RR, and standup skis DISCLAIMER: I cant spell for the life of me. |
|
05-30-2017, 10:06 PM | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 1,937
|
Re: 350 head ?'s
"How much power/hp would these heads be over my 89 heads?"
Wait a minute and we can get out the crystal ball. Seriously though. Any numbers would be guessing since you do not even know what you have now, only what a book said about a factory rating. Probably not too much different than what you are running now since the camshaft will be the same.
__________________
1969 c-10 Step Side Long Bed. I-6 250cid = = 1969 Pontiac GTO hard top. 400, 4-speed. |
05-30-2017, 11:39 PM | #10 |
60-66 Nut
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
Posts: 23,246
|
Re: 350 head ?'s
If it were me, I would use that Comp Magnum 280 cam kit and bolt a set of L31 Vortec heads on the short block (change the springs). Buy a Performer RPM intake and set a 600-670 cfm Holley on top of it. That should make a nice running engine with a little lope at idle.
__________________
Power Steering Box Adapter Plates For Sale HERE Power Brake Booster Adapter Brackets For Sale '63-'66 HERE and '67-'72 HERE and '60-'62 HERE and "60-'62 with clutch HERE Rear Disc Brake Brackets For Sale. Impala SS calipers HERE Camaro Calipers HERE D52 Calipers HERE 6 Lug HERE Hydroboost Mounting Plates HERE |
05-31-2017, 12:04 AM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Falls City, Nebraska "100 Miles From Nowhere"
Posts: 2,219
|
Re: 350 head ?'s
Thats kinda rough Tom, the guy dont know thats why he's asking?
Quote:
__________________
Michael of the clan Hill, "Two Seventy Two's" 71 1-ton Dually 350 4-Speed 71 C/50 Grain Truck, 350 Split-Axle 4-Speed 02 3/4 ton Express 14 Indian Chief Vintage 1952 Ford 8N, "Only Ford Allowed On The Property" "Be American, Buy American" |
|
05-31-2017, 06:16 AM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Vinton, Va.
Posts: 473
|
Re: 350 head ?'s
Thanks guys. Well most of you. Some people get a little cocky when not in person. No harm done. I know how to do a "Bryce Harper move" if necessary. I'll do just what was suggested, even though I wish I didn't have the added expense of new heads. But you play, you pay!!!! Thanks again!!!
|
05-31-2017, 07:08 AM | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: greensboro nc
Posts: 673
|
Re: 350 head ?'s
First rule of speed .SPEED COST and even more if Barney is around.Laughing my lawyer broke butt off.
__________________
Only the stupid know too much to learn something new. |
05-31-2017, 08:30 AM | #14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: greensboro nc
Posts: 673
|
Re: 350 head ?'s
Agree skip the old head ,lots of monay and still less flow thing. Dbl humps great in 1965 but 52 years later we have too many way better options.
As for cam.230* at .050 for mild daily driver with some towing. Maybe 250* at .050 for more hot rod and no towing. Then we have the hey dude listen to this bad sounding mother that only makes power above 4500 rpm cams.
__________________
Only the stupid know too much to learn something new. |
05-31-2017, 02:10 PM | #15 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: pleasant valley--placerville ca
Posts: 3,039
|
Re: 350 head ?'s
from what all that has been done to the old heads, not a bad deal if you don't need bolt holes. I would say they won't crack being a heavy casting. A vortec manifold is pretty $$$ also. have fun with what ever you build.
__________________
1961 chevy K10 my build is------------61K10 build |
05-31-2017, 05:25 PM | #16 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 574
|
Re: 350 head ?'s
Quote:
__________________
87 R30 CC Dually, TBI 454, NV4500, zero rust barn find 87 Jeep Grand Wagoneer, 6.5 turbodiesel, 700R4 |
|
06-01-2017, 09:12 AM | #17 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Vinton, Va.
Posts: 473
|
Re: 350 head ?'s
Lots of good info, thanks everyone.
|
06-11-2017, 12:31 PM | #18 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Safford,AZ
Posts: 3,613
|
Re: 350 head ?'s
Brand new head, would require you to run a shim gasket-
https://www.summitracing.com/parts/sum-152123/overview/ |
Bookmarks |
|
|