The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Engine & Drivetrain

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-28-2017, 11:02 AM   #1
panhead59
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Vinton, Va.
Posts: 473
350 head ?'s

I've got a 1989 completely rebuilt 350 engine. (Center valve cover bolts). It's .030 0ver. It was rebuilt by PO. I pulled one head just to be sure. Intake valves measure darn near 2" Like 1 15/16. Hey I'm a carpenter not a machinist!!! My book says this is a truck motor that was rated at 210 HP. I know it was fuel injected, but that's gone so I plan on getting an intake since I've already got a good 650 carb. Why so little hp ? Anyway, I've got a chance to buy a set of dbl hump heads that have been maged, decked, new everything. For $500. I know that's a SMOKIN' price!! What are they worth ? 69 cc on comb. chamber. 202 intakes, hardened seats, even has roller rockers. Questions are 1- will they bolt up to my 89 350? 2- Owner says 69 cc would give me high 9's to 10.0 compression ratio, with stock pistons and stock ht. deck. Is that accurate and is that surpassing the 93 octane threshold? I know it's close for cast heads. Casting # 3947041 - my book list that as 69 vette heads or 300 hp Camaro,Nova, Chevelle. How much power/hp would these heads be over my 89 heads? Worth the cost? Thanks for any/all replies.
panhead59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2017, 11:33 AM   #2
Warrens69GMC
Registered User
 
Warrens69GMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Safford,AZ
Posts: 3,613
Re: 350 head ?'s

The 210 is "net" horsepower not "gross". If you were to dyno it with a carb you would probably get close to 260-270hp. There are powertrain losses until you get to the rwhp (rear wheel horsepower).

These engines have a swirl in the chamber to promote torque to 4000 rpm while hp suffers.

Hp is a formula
Formula (RPM * T) / 5252=HP, where RPM is the engine speed, T is the torque, and 5,252 is rpms per second

Since most HP happens over 5000 rpm, that is why it is rated so low in these motors. The "swirl" stalls at 4000, not allowing HP to build.

What is your real goal with this motor?

There is no way I personally would by camel hump heads when new vortecs are just a little more.
Warrens69GMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2017, 11:54 AM   #3
panhead59
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Vinton, Va.
Posts: 473
Re: 350 head ?'s

Goal is to have a good running sunday only driver on pump gas. Rebuilding/ restoring a 68 swb. Just gonna keep old 3 speed (till I break it!!) tranny for now, then who knows, maybe just a 4 speed muncie on the floor. Of course overdrive would be nice, but that's dreaming. But I am a product of the 50-60's so power is a must. I've got a 66 GTO w/sligthly built 455 ci. but still iron heads, to compare "power". I don't need that 450 HP or so, but I can't settle for 200 either. It's gotta have a little cam/ sound and be able to get out of it's own way!! I know that's vauge but hopefully u get my drift.
panhead59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2017, 09:29 PM   #4
chris mc bride
Registered User
 
chris mc bride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: greensboro nc
Posts: 673
Re: 350 head ?'s

IMO and 2 cents it worth. Bypass the old head hop up deal Normally cost more t han worth and borderline cost of new and way improved heads,Heads will make or break power level.

As for cam. I have had great luck with the Edlebrock combo's. Performer Rpm setup has great sound and power.Now if going to tow it might be over edge w/o gearing and OD would be extra nice there.Comp 268 to 274 XE cams would be next choice. Throw on good headers and free flowing exgaust and you should be rocking.

As for compression 10:1 not problem 10.5 tuned real well work great.Any more and pushing luck. For little you gain I would call 10 the high side. 400 to 425 hp Is not real hard with sbc.
__________________
Only the stupid know too much to learn something new.
chris mc bride is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2017, 07:49 AM   #5
panhead59
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Vinton, Va.
Posts: 473
Re: 350 head ?'s

My motor has the stock heads for a 1989 350. Are these any good for what I am looking for? They are totally rebuilt and ready to to. I bought a rebuilt longblock. It was cheap. Also, my sisters boyfriend gave me this- New in box, never installed. Not even opened. Comp Cams Magnum Hyd. cam kit. K12-212-2. Cam,lifters,seals, timing chain, even springs in kit. Specs are- 280/280 advertised duration, 230/230 @ .050. 480/480 lift. lobe sep. 110. Says it fits 67-2002 350. I haven't pulled the cam out of the rebuilt engine yet but I would guess it's a stock equivalent. Not planning on towing with this truck. So here's the bottom line question- so far- If I use my heads and this cam, what kinda power will I get? Or should I bite the bullet with different heads ? I know heads are the key here. Maybe just mill heads to get desired comp. ratio. It's gotta be pretty lame for a 1989 engine. I would think. Again though, I need 0-60 torque for around town performance, not high end HP. No drag strip for this old truck. Just a very good running Sunday driver. Note- Wife will want Vintage A/C in the future I'm sure. What would you do ? NOTE-Pulled one head. I've got .110 between top of flat top piston and block.
panhead59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2017, 08:57 AM   #6
chris mc bride
Registered User
 
chris mc bride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: greensboro nc
Posts: 673
Re: 350 head ?'s

Piston is .110 below deck? Sure it was TDC ? .011 maybe?
__________________
Only the stupid know too much to learn something new.
chris mc bride is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2017, 12:28 PM   #7
panhead59
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Vinton, Va.
Posts: 473
Re: 350 head ?'s

You were right to ? my measurement.,sir!!!! I was measureing from center of piston , not outter "ring" of piston, which is the hightest point. Sorry about that. How about .052 or .053? Hard for me to hold everything square and straight with the tools I am using.

Last edited by panhead59; 05-30-2017 at 12:48 PM.
panhead59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2017, 07:27 PM   #8
Tom
driving is in my blood
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mesa AZ
Posts: 5,690
Re: 350 head ?'s

Quote:
Originally Posted by panhead59 View Post
Intake valves measure darn near 2" Like 1 15/16.
Factory intakes are 1.94"
Quote:
Anyway, I've got a chance to buy a set of dbl hump heads that have been maged, decked, new everything. For $500. I know that's a SMOKIN' price!!
Smoking crack perhaps. Thats about the cost of new vortecs, which outflow even 2.02 valved humpers. Your already getting a new intake manifold so that makes the cash outlay the same. Just need self aligning rocker arms, stock on tons of stuff and super cheap.
__________________
-78 c10 short/step: 388cid, M20, 5/5 drop, lots more. Playtoy and first vehicle.
-98 c1500 x-cab: 5.7L, 17" rims, 5/6 drop, flowmaster, helper bags,NBS rear disk brakes.
-02 Suburban 4x4: leveled front
-CBR600F4i, CBR600RR, CBR1000RR, and standup skis
DISCLAIMER: I cant spell for the life of me.
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2017, 10:06 PM   #9
GRX
Registered User
 
GRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 1,937
Re: 350 head ?'s

"How much power/hp would these heads be over my 89 heads?"

Wait a minute and we can get out the crystal ball.
Seriously though. Any numbers would be guessing since you do not even know what you have now, only what a book said about a factory rating. Probably not too much different than what you are running now since the camshaft will be the same.
__________________
1969 c-10 Step Side Long Bed. I-6 250cid = = 1969 Pontiac GTO hard top. 400, 4-speed.
GRX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2017, 11:39 PM   #10
Captainfab
60-66 Nut

 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
Posts: 23,246
Re: 350 head ?'s

If it were me, I would use that Comp Magnum 280 cam kit and bolt a set of L31 Vortec heads on the short block (change the springs). Buy a Performer RPM intake and set a 600-670 cfm Holley on top of it. That should make a nice running engine with a little lope at idle.
__________________
Power Steering Box Adapter Plates For Sale HERE
Power Brake Booster Adapter Brackets For Sale '63-'66 HERE and '67-'72 HERE and '60-'62 HERE and "60-'62 with clutch HERE
Rear Disc Brake Brackets For Sale. Impala SS calipers HERE Camaro Calipers HERE D52 Calipers HERE 6 Lug HERE
Hydroboost Mounting Plates HERE
Captainfab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2017, 12:04 AM   #11
Ironangel
Senior Member
 
Ironangel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Falls City, Nebraska "100 Miles From Nowhere"
Posts: 2,219
Re: 350 head ?'s

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom View Post
Factory intakes are 1.94"

Smoking crack perhaps.
Thats kinda rough Tom, the guy dont know thats why he's asking?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Captainfab View Post
If it were me, I would use that Comp Magnum 280 cam kit and bolt a set of L31 Vortec heads on the short block (change the springs). Buy a Performer RPM intake and set a 600-670 cfm Holley on top of it. That should make a nice running engine with a little lope at idle.
This! The Captain pretty well sums it up right here! Forget the double humps and just buy a set of plain Jane L-31 Vortec heads and have them reworked for the springs and cam in that kit. The kit is good as long as the heads (valve guides) are machined for those springs. A good machine shop will know what to do with that kit and a set of naked (new) Vortec heads. Get the Edelbrock Performer intake for a Vortec heads and top it all off with a good or new 650cfm carb and have a little monster of a small block!
__________________
Michael of the clan Hill,
"Two Seventy Two's"
71 1-ton Dually 350 4-Speed
71 C/50 Grain Truck, 350 Split-Axle 4-Speed
02 3/4 ton Express
14 Indian Chief Vintage
1952 Ford 8N, "Only Ford Allowed On The Property"
"Be American, Buy American"
Ironangel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2017, 06:16 AM   #12
panhead59
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Vinton, Va.
Posts: 473
Re: 350 head ?'s

Thanks guys. Well most of you. Some people get a little cocky when not in person. No harm done. I know how to do a "Bryce Harper move" if necessary. I'll do just what was suggested, even though I wish I didn't have the added expense of new heads. But you play, you pay!!!! Thanks again!!!
panhead59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2017, 07:08 AM   #13
chris mc bride
Registered User
 
chris mc bride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: greensboro nc
Posts: 673
Re: 350 head ?'s

First rule of speed .SPEED COST and even more if Barney is around.Laughing my lawyer broke butt off.
__________________
Only the stupid know too much to learn something new.
chris mc bride is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2017, 08:30 AM   #14
chris mc bride
Registered User
 
chris mc bride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: greensboro nc
Posts: 673
Re: 350 head ?'s

Agree skip the old head ,lots of monay and still less flow thing. Dbl humps great in 1965 but 52 years later we have too many way better options.

As for cam.230* at .050 for mild daily driver with some towing. Maybe 250* at .050 for more hot rod and no towing. Then we have the hey dude listen to this bad sounding mother that only makes power above 4500 rpm cams.
__________________
Only the stupid know too much to learn something new.
chris mc bride is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2017, 02:10 PM   #15
61K10
Registered User
 
61K10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: pleasant valley--placerville ca
Posts: 3,039
Re: 350 head ?'s

from what all that has been done to the old heads, not a bad deal if you don't need bolt holes. I would say they won't crack being a heavy casting. A vortec manifold is pretty $$$ also. have fun with what ever you build.
__________________
1961 chevy K10

my build is------------61K10 build
61K10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2017, 05:25 PM   #16
DieselSJ
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 574
Re: 350 head ?'s

Quote:
Originally Posted by panhead59 View Post
My motor has the stock heads for a 1989 350. Are these any good for what I am looking for? They are totally rebuilt and ready to to. I bought a rebuilt longblock. It was cheap. Also, my sisters boyfriend gave me this- New in box, never installed. Not even opened. Comp Cams Magnum Hyd. cam kit. K12-212-2. Cam,lifters,seals, timing chain, even springs in kit. Specs are- 280/280 advertised duration, 230/230 @ .050. 480/480 lift. lobe sep. 110. Says it fits 67-2002 350. I haven't pulled the cam out of the rebuilt engine yet but I would guess it's a stock equivalent. Not planning on towing with this truck. So here's the bottom line question- so far- If I use my heads and this cam, what kinda power will I get? Or should I bite the bullet with different heads ? I know heads are the key here. Maybe just mill heads to get desired comp. ratio. It's gotta be pretty lame for a 1989 engine. I would think. Again though, I need 0-60 torque for around town performance, not high end HP. No drag strip for this old truck. Just a very good running Sunday driver. Note- Wife will want Vintage A/C in the future I'm sure. What would you do ? NOTE-Pulled one head. I've got .110 between top of flat top piston and block.
IMHO, 230 @ 050 is too much for stock compression. You want to keep that down under 220. With that motor I'd probably find something around 210-215 @ 050 which would give you much better torque and be much more fun on the street than that big cam. Big cam with stock compression makes them soggy on the bottom end. I had a basically stock 350 in my old CJ5 with an isky cam that was 208/212 @ 050 with a Performer intake. It was out of breath by 5000rpm, but it pulled hard over the entire RPM range and there wasn't much that could keep up through the top of 3rd gear.
__________________
87 R30 CC Dually, TBI 454, NV4500, zero rust barn find
87 Jeep Grand Wagoneer, 6.5 turbodiesel, 700R4
DieselSJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2017, 09:12 AM   #17
panhead59
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Vinton, Va.
Posts: 473
Re: 350 head ?'s

Lots of good info, thanks everyone.
panhead59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2017, 12:31 PM   #18
Warrens69GMC
Registered User
 
Warrens69GMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Safford,AZ
Posts: 3,613
Re: 350 head ?'s

Brand new head, would require you to run a shim gasket-

https://www.summitracing.com/parts/sum-152123/overview/
Warrens69GMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com