Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-07-2009, 04:50 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Salina, Kansas
Posts: 1,998
|
engine displacement question
ok.. im taking a 302 and boring it .060 and dropping in a 347 stroker kit.. what will that make the displacement be?
__________________
1972 C-10...402/400..flowmaster 40 series 1967 Mustang 347 stroker/C-4 1966 Mustang 289/3-speed 2013 Mustang V6/6speed w/300 ponies I may be 23, but i sure do knows 67-72s are sexy! Its not MPG its smiles per gallon! build started 11/25/08 build thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=2993796 |
10-07-2009, 05:14 PM | #2 |
a fool with no money
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Overton, Tx
Posts: 532
|
Re: engine displacement question
what's the stock bore diameter of a 302?
__________________
Basicly stock 83 SWB with a few Bolt-ons before, during and still during http://photobucket.com/albums/y251/moostifer/truck/ http://photobucket.com/albums/y251/moostifer/motor/ |
10-07-2009, 05:21 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ftw tex
Posts: 682
|
Re: engine displacement question
A 352? I know on a sbc 350 that's .60 is a 357, so I added seven to 347 and got 352, not sure if it correct or not. I will ask one of my turbo mustang buddy, he's building a 347 that's been bored for a customer.
|
10-07-2009, 05:21 PM | #4 |
a fool with no money
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Overton, Tx
Posts: 532
|
Re: engine displacement question
4.0 std bore + 0.06 + 347 stroke = 355.7 cid
maybe...
__________________
Basicly stock 83 SWB with a few Bolt-ons before, during and still during http://photobucket.com/albums/y251/moostifer/truck/ http://photobucket.com/albums/y251/moostifer/motor/ Last edited by Moostifer; 10-07-2009 at 05:23 PM. |
10-07-2009, 06:30 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: daytonabeach
Posts: 22,956
|
Re: engine displacement question
60 is a pretty chancy overbore on those small fords// make sure it's sonic checked for core shift etc
__________________
71c-10 350/2004r/4:11 lowered3/4 longbed/dead by hurricane MEANING OF DEATH::::: SOMEBODY ELSE GETS YOUR STUFF DONT BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU THINK TAKE MY ADVISE;I DON'T USE IT ANYWAY |
10-07-2009, 06:48 PM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Corona, California
Posts: 7,998
|
Re: engine displacement question
If you know the bore and stroke here is a calculator to give you the answer you want.
Kim http://www.ajdesigner.com/phpengine/...lacement_b.php Last edited by Kim57; 10-07-2009 at 06:53 PM. |
10-07-2009, 07:19 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Salina, Kansas
Posts: 1,998
|
Re: engine displacement question
well its bored .040 and whoever had the car before us mustve not bored it right because its got .001" too much clearance and so to get it perfect we gotta go to .060
__________________
1972 C-10...402/400..flowmaster 40 series 1967 Mustang 347 stroker/C-4 1966 Mustang 289/3-speed 2013 Mustang V6/6speed w/300 ponies I may be 23, but i sure do knows 67-72s are sexy! Its not MPG its smiles per gallon! build started 11/25/08 build thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=2993796 |
10-07-2009, 08:04 PM | #8 |
~Rest In Peace~
Join Date: May 2005
Location: CALIFORNIA NOR CAL
Posts: 9,707
|
Re: engine displacement question
sleeve it
__________________
is it fast ? it has a lighting bolt donut? B___H please, I can remove 90% of your so called "beauty" with a kleenex |
10-07-2009, 09:30 PM | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Livermore ca
Posts: 699
|
Re: engine displacement question
Yea I would have that sonic checked. Ford motors are not very thick at all, unless its a prized mexico block. Better safe then sorry.
|
10-07-2009, 10:43 PM | #10 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,427
|
Re: engine displacement question
Sorry to be a pain in the butt, but this is barely high school math...
The area of a circle: Pi times radius squared. Radius is half the bore plus the overbore. Pi is 3.1414 with most of the decimal places rounded off. The volume of a cylinder is area times the stroke. Total cubes is number of cylinders times volume above. Area x stroke x number of cylinders. Lots of folks want to use magic numbers, but why bother when the real numbers are simple enough? The stroke and bore should be easily available but I'm too lazy to google them... 3.1414*((bore+.060)/2)*((bore+.060)/2)*stroke*8=displacement Edited because I forgot the squared part, and apologies in case the beers are kicking in and I'm being an ass again... Last edited by 72lb4x4; 10-07-2009 at 10:46 PM. |
10-08-2009, 09:08 AM | #11 | |
Active Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Centrally located between Houston, Austin and Waco. BCS area.
Posts: 7,947
|
Re: engine displacement question
Quote:
|
|
10-08-2009, 09:43 AM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: DFW
Posts: 463
|
Re: engine displacement question
Bad, bad, bad idea going .060 on any type of small block.
Go the least you have to. If you have to go 60 to make it usable spend another 100 bucks to get a different block. |
10-08-2009, 10:16 AM | #13 |
No No
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pueblo Colorado
Posts: 1,781
|
Re: engine displacement question
I wouldent do it. Like mentioned above sleeve it or replace the block! Your gong to spend the $$ on a stroker crank might as well not skimp on the platform (block). The SBF engine block needs alot of support to live when pumping out power. If your planning on making a 350+ crank hp engine and it kinda sounds like you are a valley girdle and main girdle are nessasary. Ive seen first hand several 302 engines crack under pressure. Not to sound negative or biased since this is a gm site but ford small blocks were designed like crap. One positive I can admit since Ive had my hands inside alot of ford engines as long as you have a set of heads on them that flow these engines respond very well even with smaller cams.
__________________
1976 Custom Deluxe SWB Med FMB.3/4 Drop. Gen VI 454, Muncie HD 3 speed With Modified OE Hurst Shifter, 3.73 12 bolt, GMPP HO roller cam, Hooker headers, Performer intake with modified Q-jet, Accel distributor. Best 1/4 12.3 @108. Funnest run 19.84 @88 full 1/4 mile burn out. 1997 K1500 ext cab 5.7 stock except muffler |
10-09-2009, 06:22 PM | #14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ottawa Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,156
|
Re: engine displacement question
You should be able to score a used 302 for little change. Keep it at 30 over max.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|