The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-21-2019, 02:40 PM   #1
red211
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Goodlettsville
Posts: 33
My rod is too short.

Swapping the 63 to a disc brake set up off an 87 donor truck. Not doing power at this time so swapped a dual bowl disc drum non power mast cyl from a 71 c10. Got it at OReilleys, it is the same as the impala and such. Bolted it on but rod is short, adjusted out but still short. The flange on the master cylinder that sticks through firewall is shorter than the single that was on it by a good inch. I went back and We did some checking but all were shorter. I made a spacer that fit inside plunger and that fixed it but haven't seen anyone else with this issue. I know the old master is correct since I have had it since 1980 and it was 100% original when I got it from Grandpa. Anyone else had this?
red211 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2019, 06:32 PM   #2
shp4man
Registered User
 
shp4man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 547
Re: My rod is too short.

Lol.
__________________
Everybody has to believe in something. I believe I'll have another beer.
shp4man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2019, 06:47 PM   #3
studeclunker
Registered User
 
studeclunker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fawn Lodge, Ca.
Posts: 293
Re: My rod is too short.

Quote:
Originally Posted by shp4man View Post
Lol.
Oh dear, me too, I fear!

You are doing disc brakes without a booster? My experience has been that disc brakes without power assist are a right good bugger to use. The disc brakes require a lot more leg pressure to work. The power booster makes it a lot more tolerable.
studeclunker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2019, 07:05 PM   #4
nsb29
Senior Member
 
nsb29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: new smyrna beach fl / 29 palms cal
Posts: 1,727
Re: My rod is too short.

Story of my life
nsb29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2019, 07:09 PM   #5
nsb29
Senior Member
 
nsb29's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: new smyrna beach fl / 29 palms cal
Posts: 1,727
Re: My rod is too short.

I did a 65 ford four wheel disc brakes stock master cylinder stopped very well no power buster
nsb29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2019, 08:06 PM   #6
red211
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Goodlettsville
Posts: 33
Re: My rod is too short.

I am not worried about performance, nothing wrong with non power, just takes more leg power. It just surprised Me that everything I have read it was supposed to be a bolt on with no modification and something many here have done without mentioning the rod length. My spacer worked perfect, I just thought it was odd no one had mentioned it.
red211 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2019, 12:16 AM   #7
Captainfab
60-66 Nut

 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
Posts: 23,246
Re: My rod is too short.

This issue is because the '63-'70 master cylinders have a shallow bore in the back of the piston. The '71 and up masters have a deep bore in the back of the piston.
__________________
Power Steering Box Adapter Plates For Sale HERE
Power Brake Booster Adapter Brackets For Sale '63-'66 HERE and '67-'72 HERE and '60-'62 HERE and "60-'62 with clutch HERE
Rear Disc Brake Brackets For Sale. Impala SS calipers HERE Camaro Calipers HERE D52 Calipers HERE 6 Lug HERE
Hydroboost Mounting Plates HERE
Captainfab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2019, 12:39 AM   #8
studeclunker
Registered User
 
studeclunker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fawn Lodge, Ca.
Posts: 293
Re: My rod is too short.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Captainfab View Post
This issue is because the '63-'70 master cylinders have a shallow bore in the back of the piston. The '71 and up masters have a deep bore in the back of the piston.
I have been considering replacing my little single pot with a dual. So, I'll keep that in mind. Cap'n do I have to replace the booster when changing over from a single to a dual?
studeclunker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2019, 01:14 AM   #9
Captainfab
60-66 Nut

 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
Posts: 23,246
Re: My rod is too short.

No, not as long as you use a dual reservoir master with the deep bore in the back of the piston. A '67-'70 truck master will have that deep bore.

Quote:
Originally Posted by studeclunker View Post
I have been considering replacing my little single pot with a dual. So, I'll keep that in mind. Cap'n do I have to replace the booster when changing over from a single to a dual?
__________________
Power Steering Box Adapter Plates For Sale HERE
Power Brake Booster Adapter Brackets For Sale '63-'66 HERE and '67-'72 HERE and '60-'62 HERE and "60-'62 with clutch HERE
Rear Disc Brake Brackets For Sale. Impala SS calipers HERE Camaro Calipers HERE D52 Calipers HERE 6 Lug HERE
Hydroboost Mounting Plates HERE
Captainfab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2019, 09:20 AM   #10
69 C10 LWB
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: St Louis Mo
Posts: 214
Re: My rod is too short.

I ran into the same issue with my 65 when I swapped to a dual master cylinder. I bought a 3/8 coupling nut and drilled it out and retapped it to the proper thread which I think is 7/16 fine thread and cut the head off a bolt and used that to extend the pushrod the extra inch I needed.
69 C10 LWB is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com