The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Engine & Drivetrain

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-25-2018, 02:26 PM   #1
ChadW
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Danville, IL
Posts: 44
200-4r transmission questions/opinions

I am looking at putting a 200-4r trans in my 66...Its still a very big project but am gathering up parts and pieces as i can...I was leaning towards a 700r4 but with my 3.73 rear gear and the large gearing diference in 1st and 2nd on the 700, it looks like id be better off with a 200-4r tranny...Does anyone run one of these? I have a dual bolt pattern 200-4r near me that i can pick up for $150...No clue on its history so will probably be rebuilt...Is that a decent price for a core and what are the pros/cons over a 700r4.

I will be running a mild 327 with aluminum heads and a 260h comp cam
ChadW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2018, 04:28 PM   #2
The Rocknrod
Too Cool For School
 
The Rocknrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: China Spring, TX
Posts: 2,658
Re: 200-4r transmission questions/opinions

Yes that's a decent price, cores usually run $200 so you should be set.
There are some benefits to the 200R4 that are misunderstood, slightly lower first gear and a taller 4th gear.
The 2004R has closer gear ratios 1st 2.74:1,2nd 1.57:1,3rd 1.00:1,4th 0.67:1, Rev.2.06:1 2.
The input/turbine shaft while smaller only has one oil circuit only going halfway through it. While the 700R4 has a larger input/turbine shaft it has 4 oil circuits going all the way through it. It could be said that the 700R4 input shaft is more hollowed than the 2004R input shaft. That's probably the biggest misunderstanding about the two.
Attached Images
 
The Rocknrod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2018, 04:41 PM   #3
ChadW
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Danville, IL
Posts: 44
Re: 200-4r transmission questions/opinions

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rocknrod View Post
Yes that's a decent price, cores usually run $200 so you should be set.
There are some benefits to the 200R4 that are misunderstood, slightly lower first gear and a taller 4th gear.
The 2004R has closer gear ratios 1st 2.74:1,2nd 1.57:1,3rd 1.00:1,4th 0.67:1, Rev.2.06:1 2.
The input/turbine shaft while smaller only has one oil circuit only going halfway through it. While the 700R4 has a larger input/turbine shaft it has 4 oil circuits going all the way through it. It could be said that the 700R4 input shaft is more hollowed than the 2004R input shaft. That's probably the biggest misunderstanding about the two.
so with my mild 327 and 3.73 gears i should be fine with the 200 over the 700, right? I like the closer gear ratios of the 200 but keep reading they are not as strong as the 700
ChadW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2018, 05:53 PM   #4
The Rocknrod
Too Cool For School
 
The Rocknrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: China Spring, TX
Posts: 2,658
Re: 200-4r transmission questions/opinions

What I explained was what people misunderstand concerning strength in the 200. You will be just fine.
The Rocknrod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2018, 12:29 AM   #5
andyh1956
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: thomastown mississippi
Posts: 994
Re: 200-4r transmission questions/opinions

My son's Type T Buick had a 200. I don't know how much power that little V6 cranked out but the trans never failed! That car was scary fast!
andyh1956 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2018, 11:44 AM   #6
The Rocknrod
Too Cool For School
 
The Rocknrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: China Spring, TX
Posts: 2,658
Re: 200-4r transmission questions/opinions

Any OD Trans (700R4 or 2004R) will fail if the transmission throttle valve (TV) cable is not properly adjusted.
The Rocknrod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2018, 03:11 PM   #7
Tom
driving is in my blood
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mesa AZ
Posts: 4,703
Re: 200-4r transmission questions/opinions

I ran a 200-4R behind a vortec 350 I had pulled from a 99 and put in my 79. They work as good as you can expect an automatic to work.
__________________
-78 c10 short/step: 388cid, M20, 5/5 drop, lots more. Playtoy and first vehicle.
-98 c1500 x-cab: 5.7L, 17" rims, 5/6 drop, flowmaster, helper bags,NBS rear disk brakes.
-06 CBR600F4i: 110mph in 2nd at 14,000rpm= happiness.
-02 Suburban 4x4: stock
DISCLAIMER: I cant spell for the life of me.
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2018, 11:40 AM   #8
Jrainman
Senior Member
 
Jrainman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: North East PA
Posts: 420
Re: 200-4r transmission questions/opinions

I run a upgraded rebuilt 200r4 /gm L31 crate engine /3.08 rear . and like everything the trans has to offer ,I drive it daily, and the MPG is a added bounus for me , the gear ratios are a really nice addition .

I like it so much I plan on getting another one in my 69 project truck, Im sold on the 200 4rs but that is just my opinion.
Jrainman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2018, 11:57 AM   #9
mattfranklin
Registered User
 
mattfranklin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Moraga, CA
Posts: 425
Re: 200-4r transmission questions/opinions

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rocknrod View Post
Yes that's a decent price, cores usually run $200 so you should be set.
There are some benefits to the 200R4 that are misunderstood, slightly lower first gear and a taller 4th gear.
The 2004R has closer gear ratios 1st 2.74:1,2nd 1.57:1,3rd 1.00:1,4th 0.67:1, Rev.2.06:1 2.
The input/turbine shaft while smaller only has one oil circuit only going halfway through it. While the 700R4 has a larger input/turbine shaft it has 4 oil circuits going all the way through it. It could be said that the 700R4 input shaft is more hollowed than the 2004R input shaft. That's probably the biggest misunderstanding about the two.
Really interesting. I never knew that. My only impression of the 200 was based in the problems it had when first rolled out. The explanation at the time was that the tolerances were not as consistent in the early models, but they said they fixed it. I never quite bought the story, but your explanation and the experiences of the other guys are helping to persuade me.
__________________
(Very) Slow-Going Build Thread: Stock 1970 Short Step with Stock 1970 LT-1

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=567340
mattfranklin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2018, 03:57 PM   #10
YoungPup1977
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 445
Re: 200-4r transmission questions/opinions

Sort a makes me wonder why they did not make a 4x4 200r4 since they "appear" to be strong.....
YoungPup1977 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2018, 04:41 PM   #11
Killer Bee
Registered User
 
Killer Bee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Barber City, CA
Posts: 1,116
Re: 200-4r transmission questions/opinions

Bigdav160 splained it here, one piece case doesn't provide for adapters..

http://www.67-72chevytrucks.com/vboa...67#post8257767
__________________
I started out with nothing - and I still have most of it
Killer Bee is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2018, 06:46 PM   #12
The Rocknrod
Too Cool For School
 
The Rocknrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: China Spring, TX
Posts: 2,658
Re: 200-4r transmission questions/opinions

Quote:
Originally Posted by Killer Bee View Post
Bigdav160 splained it here, one piece case doesn't provide for adapters..
http://www.67-72chevytrucks.com/vboa...67#post8257767
Interesting, never considered that's the reason.
The Rocknrod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2018, 03:17 PM   #13
SJLenz1340
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ingleside, IL
Posts: 40
Re: 200-4r transmission questions/opinions

If the intent (which In my opinion is wise) is to rebuild the core, work with your rebuilder and find one that is reliable. I did the same and spoke with the rebuilder for about half an hour before we came to a conclusion regarding our path. Perhaps an interview if you will to ascertain if you wish to work with this individual.
The change out is rather straightforward depending on what you are starting with. I agree the TV cable is key, and depending on what carb you have it can be either real easy or a royal pain with no outside support. Next is the speedo drive bullet, finding the ratio is easy online (they are all color coded) but the 2004R has a larger bullet than 350, 400, or powerslide. Replace the seals on the bullet, donít screw around. Then you have to reconfigure you trans cooler lines. I chose to replace mine entirely. And while on that subject my rebuilder recommended an additional trans cooler, he stated that transmissions of that era all died from heat. We still have to lock up the TC electrically, if you have the external plug great, if not the easiest place I found was Amazon.
Good luck with your project!
__________________
Regards
Steve
SJLenz1340 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2018, 03:59 PM   #14
DLW
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Union City, CA
Posts: 349
Re: 200-4r transmission questions/opinions

Some Good info.
I would not worry to much about the difference in first gear ratio for making the choice, either will work fine in a 3.73 driver, just my opinion having had a 4l60 and 3.73 and 4.10 gears.

I would see what is the easiest to swap for you, for example the 200R4 is shorter than the 700R4 by about 3 inches (its a direct swap for a TH350) so maybe driveshaft will not need shortened, not sure, just an example.

Both trans are good, either can be made quite strong. I would think building and parts prices might favor the 700R4. I would not hesitate to use a 200R4 though.
DLW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2018, 11:55 AM   #15
GASoline71
"I ain't nobody, dork."
 
GASoline71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Whidbey Island, Washington
Posts: 8,294
Re: 200-4r transmission questions/opinions

I think the 200-4R's get a bad rap because there is also a "Metric" TH200 that came behind the V-6's in the 3rd Gen F-bodies and also G-bodies... and they were absolute junk.

Gary
__________________
'cuz chicks dig scars...

My 1972 GMC 1500 Super Custom (Creeping Death) "long term" build thread.

The Rebuild of Creeping Death after the wreck

Quote:
Originally Posted by LONGHAIR View Post
I would never rebuild a 305.
Quote:
Originally Posted by prostreetC-10 View Post
I love using vacuum gauges as part of the carb tuning process. I hook the gauge to the inside of my garbage can and leave it there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marv D View Post
Remember Murphys 2nd law of mechanical relationships... "OPPOSING COMPONENTS ATTEMPTING TO OCCUPY THE SAME SPACE, AT THE SAME TIME, GENERALLY END UP OCCUPYING ADJOINING SPACE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE OIL PAN"
GASoline71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2018, 02:36 PM   #16
tdangle
Senior Member
 
tdangle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Jurupa Valley, Ca
Posts: 318
Re: 200-4r transmission questions/opinions

I just finished a TH350 to 200-4R swap in my 70 C20. I had to move the cross member back to the TH400 mounting holes, the driveshaft fit perfect. I made my own TC lockup wiring, by wiring bringing the TC lockup solenoid ground to a NO 4th gear pressure switch and then running ign switched 12V thru a newer brake light switch to the solenoid. Only locks in 4th and disconnects when I hit the brakes

Trans cooler lines were easy, they are switched (in/out) from the TH350. I was able to just reroute them a little and hooked right up. (I do have an aux cooler which is highly recommended)

Also needed metric bolts for the flywheel to TC mounting, metric bolts for the trans mount (used my mount from the TH350). Bought new drive and driven speedo gears. The speedo cable hooked up no problem

For the TV cable I used the cable that came on the donor trans. I still have the stock quadrajet 4BBL. I bought a bracket from TCI that mounts on the back studs of the carb. I picked up a TV stud assembly made by holly and was able to use the forward lower hole on the carb linkage. It was just about perfect per the diagrams I found on the internet. Everything seems to work fine so far. Dropped the RPM at just over 60 from around 3000 to 2000 with my 4.11 gear ratio
__________________
Terry

1970 C20 Custom Camper, 350/2004R, Dana 60 4.11, Factory AC, side tool box, wood bed. Family bought it new
tdangle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2018, 07:11 PM   #17
YoungPup1977
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 445
Re: 200-4r transmission questions/opinions

The difference between the 200 and 200r4 can be identified by the pan, the metric 200 has a square pan with one corner cut off.....the 200r4 has a shallower sump area in the rear, so the 200r4 is worth replacing the existing T350, toss the metric 200 into the lake for a anchor...
YoungPup1977 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2018, 08:46 PM   #18
The Rocknrod
Too Cool For School
 
The Rocknrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: China Spring, TX
Posts: 2,658
Re: 200-4r transmission questions/opinions

Quote:
Originally Posted by GASoline71 View Post
I think the 200-4R's get a bad rap because there is also a "Metric" TH200 that came behind the V-6's in the 3rd Gen F-bodies and also G-bodies... and they were absolute junk.
Gary
I think your right, I never thought of that.
The Rocknrod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2018, 10:13 AM   #19
Jrainman
Senior Member
 
Jrainman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: North East PA
Posts: 420
Re: 200-4r transmission questions/opinions

I agree a lot of people get the 2 confused even thought the 200 was a 3 speed , but it was the platform the 200 4r was built on because GM needed a smaller compact trans to fit in the cars they were building after they relized the faults in the metalolgy of the 200 they corrected them while engineering the 200 4r thats why in the late 80s the 2004 r4 was installed in a vast number of GM cars such as the buick grand national , monticarlo SS , caddilac and even the corvette just to name a few . Every tranmission has faults (week points) and most can be corrected and made better with the proper rebuild .
Jrainman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2013 67-72chevytrucks.com