The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-12-2019, 11:24 AM   #1
ChadW
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Danville, IL
Posts: 160
66 Layed out question...

I am building a swb 66 that will lay frame...Im getting ready to mock up my motor mounts and had a question about oil pan clearance. Im staying old school and running a built sbc 327 and not going LS...Ive read a bunch about people having oil pan clearance issues with the LS but i dont see much on an old school sbc...my motor mounts will be welded in so i will have some play with height but not much due to hood clearance etc...any opinions on this or real world experience?

ChadW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2019, 08:48 AM   #2
77c10bowtie
Registered User
 
77c10bowtie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Goodyear, AZ
Posts: 59
Re: 66 Layed out question...

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChadW View Post
I am building a swb 66 that will lay frame...Im getting ready to mock up my motor mounts and had a question about oil pan clearance. Im staying old school and running a built sbc 327 and not going LS...Ive read a bunch about people having oil pan clearance issues with the LS but i dont see much on an old school sbc...my motor mounts will be welded in so i will have some play with height but not much due to hood clearance etc...any opinions on this or real world experience?
both LS and SBC can be remedied with the correct pan, they have had shallow wide pans around for years for the sbc motors, they are spendy but will get the job done. the only issue will be exhaust when it comes to routing near one of those shallow pans with the large kickout.

LS have several pans available as well to fix the issue bringing the pan above the crossmember so if anything hits it would be your crossmember. search CTS-V pan.

Last edited by 77c10bowtie; 02-13-2019 at 12:56 PM.
77c10bowtie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2019, 10:50 AM   #3
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,910
Re: 66 Layed out question...

Many LS swaps require a pan change because of the pan type (truck motors being the most common culprit). These require a retrofit pan/pick-up that's shallower vs. the truck pan. SBC's w/a standard 4qt pan don't really hang lower vs. aftermarket deeper pans.

I would consult the manufacturer of your front suspension & see what they have to say.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com