The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Engine & Drivetrain > LSx Swaps

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-09-2018, 03:20 PM   #101
1971Stepside
Almost Satisfied
 
1971Stepside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 2,928
Re: Speed Engineering LS Swap Headers Findings

Quote:
Has anyone used the f-body long tube speed engineering headers on a C10? I have an fbody oil pan and want to find longtubes that don't have below the pan much if at all.
I used the C10 long tubes and have the CTS-V pan and the headers do not hang below either the engine or transmission pan. Using POL engine stands.
Attached Images
  
__________________
1971 C10 Stepside. LSx 6.0 with BTR Stage IV, Speed Engineering Headers, 4L80e transmission w/3200 Circle-D Stall. 3.73. Posi. Purchased this truck when I was 17. I started the rebuild (or take apart) in 1993. I have drug it around all over the country in pieces. Finally back on the road in 2021.

"I can't complain, but sometimes I still do. Life's been good to me so far."
1971Stepside is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2018, 03:26 PM   #102
crakarjax
Registered User
 
crakarjax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 1,302
Re: Speed Engineering LS Swap Headers Findings

Hmm ok the f-body pan is 1" shallower than the cts-v. Based on your pics it does look like they would hang below the f-body pan unfortunately.
__________________
1968 LWB C20 / AC / Wood Bed
crakarjax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2018, 05:14 PM   #103
1971Stepside
Almost Satisfied
 
1971Stepside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 2,928
Re: Speed Engineering LS Swap Headers Findings

Quote:
Hmm ok the f-body pan is 1" shallower than the cts-v. Based on your pics it does look like they would hang below the f-body pan unfortunately.
Ah, I thought both pans were the same depth but the F-body was deeper toward the front of the pan. My mistake. You are right, you would be about even to a little below the pan.
__________________
1971 C10 Stepside. LSx 6.0 with BTR Stage IV, Speed Engineering Headers, 4L80e transmission w/3200 Circle-D Stall. 3.73. Posi. Purchased this truck when I was 17. I started the rebuild (or take apart) in 1993. I have drug it around all over the country in pieces. Finally back on the road in 2021.

"I can't complain, but sometimes I still do. Life's been good to me so far."
1971Stepside is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2018, 07:52 AM   #104
aggie91
I'm just glad to be here!
 
aggie91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Longview, TX
Posts: 4,788
Re: Speed Engineering LS Swap Headers Findings

Quote:
Originally Posted by cornerstone View Post
They do fit quite well though.
Whose engine stands/mounts did you use? Thinking of doing the same on one I am putting together...
__________________
Karl



1965 Chevy Stepside(Grandpa's Old Blue) and (July 2015 Shop Build!)(2020, the Saga Continues)
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=372424

The LST Challenge:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=1#post7812257

Korbin's 1st Square: "Sunburn"
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=418618

1985 GMC Sierra: "White Trash", Korbin's 2nd now...
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=632305

Henry - 1984 Chevrolet, Owen's 1st Square
aggie91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2018, 11:56 AM   #105
rgrhoward
Registered User
 
rgrhoward's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Tacoma
Posts: 18
Re: Speed Engineering LS Swap Headers Findings

I had to order a set after this thread, for $300 bucks why not? The drivers side flange was just a tad warped but the gaskets should seal up just fine.

Stupid question... are they supposed to be offset like that? I find it weird that they do not meet "even" at the back.

Also a close up pic of the drivers side where the header comes REAL close to a casting on the block.
Attached Images
   
rgrhoward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2018, 02:19 PM   #106
gringoloco
A guy with a truck
 
gringoloco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Germany, for now
Posts: 5,920
Re: Speed Engineering LS Swap Headers Findings

Mine are close at that protrusion on the block, too. Also pretty common for header collectors to be staggered, depending on the design. Part of it is the offset of the cylinder banks, amongst other things
__________________
-Chris

Instagram _elgringoloco_

'70 Short-Wide How to: Ruin a perfectly good C10
‘70 Blazer ConversionHow To: Ruin a Perfectly Good 4wd
'72 Highlander How To: Ruin a Perfectly Good K/5 (SOLD)
'72 Blazer 2WD How to: Ruin a perfectly good Blazer (SOLD)
'05 Yukon Daily Driven (not so stock) Yukon (SOLD)
‘07 Yukon Denali (daily)

Members met list: SCOTI, darkhorse970, 67cheby, 67cheby'sGirl, klmore, porterbuilt, n2billet, Fastrucken, classicchev, Col Clank, GSFMECH, HuggerCST, Spray-Bomb, BACKYARD88, 5150, fine69, fatbass, smbrouss70, 65StreetCruiser, GAc10boy
gringoloco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2018, 12:39 PM   #107
beaterku
Registered User
 
beaterku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Lenexa, KS
Posts: 547
Re: Speed Engineering LS Swap Headers Findings

I bought a set of the shorty headers for my truck.

Here are the pictures of the passenger side. It is TIGHT! I do not have gaskets in yet as this is just mockup. The v-band cannot be removed without loosening the manifold bolts. I need to check it with gaskets. That's a bummer if not. The collector is damn near touching the block. A clearance hammer may fix this. Runners 4 and 6 are touching. A little pry may loosen up this tolerance.

Overall, for $149 bucks, I can't really complain. If I have to massage them a little, I am ok with that.
Attached Images
    
beaterku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2018, 12:40 PM   #108
beaterku
Registered User
 
beaterku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Lenexa, KS
Posts: 547
Re: Speed Engineering LS Swap Headers Findings

Driver side. No gaskets installed yet. #1 primary is touching the block. Again, this can be clearance easy enough. V-band clears no problem.
Attached Images
  
beaterku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2018, 12:47 PM   #109
Macdaddy1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Niceville Florida
Posts: 347
Re: Speed Engineering LS Swap Headers Findings

I used the speed engineering ram horns and had no problems with clearance.
Macdaddy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2018, 11:56 PM   #110
Project1970
14.1 @ 96MPH
 
Project1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 2,811
Re: Speed Engineering LS Swap Headers Findings

Quote:
Originally Posted by crakarjax View Post
Hmm ok the f-body pan is 1" shallower than the cts-v. Based on your pics it does look like they would hang below the f-body pan unfortunately.
Yes, they hang a bit below the F-body pan, but they're still about even with the trans pan.

__________________
Project1970 - LS1 Swap Complete!
Project1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2018, 05:12 PM   #111
crakarjax
Registered User
 
crakarjax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 1,302
Re: Speed Engineering LS Swap Headers Findings

Quote:
Originally Posted by Project1970 View Post
Yes, they hang a bit below the F-body pan, but they're still about even with the trans pan.
Thank you, super helpful info as I think they'll work for me if they are at least even with the trans pan!
__________________
1968 LWB C20 / AC / Wood Bed
crakarjax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2018, 09:49 PM   #112
Coursey
Registered User
 
Coursey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 549
Re: Speed Engineering LS Swap Headers Findings

I have a 1976 Blazer 2 wd. Lowered 5/7.

Installing LS3/6L80e. With Tejas mounts.


Is there a reason to go with long tubes or shortys or mid length? and why?
Coursey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-23-2018, 01:27 AM   #113
gringoloco
A guy with a truck
 
gringoloco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Germany, for now
Posts: 5,920
Re: Speed Engineering LS Swap Headers Findings

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coursey View Post
I have a 1976 Blazer 2 wd. Lowered 5/7.

Installing LS3/6L80e. With Tejas mounts.


Is there a reason to go with long tubes or shortys or mid length? and why?
Long tubes = more power and torque. Mid length are a compromise when LTs don’t fit. Shorties are a waste of time; all of the bad (heat, potential leaks/fitment issues, etc) with no real benefit over manifolds. It’s all about your priorities: power, looks, clearance, cost, ease of install, the list goes on...
__________________
-Chris

Instagram _elgringoloco_

'70 Short-Wide How to: Ruin a perfectly good C10
‘70 Blazer ConversionHow To: Ruin a Perfectly Good 4wd
'72 Highlander How To: Ruin a Perfectly Good K/5 (SOLD)
'72 Blazer 2WD How to: Ruin a perfectly good Blazer (SOLD)
'05 Yukon Daily Driven (not so stock) Yukon (SOLD)
‘07 Yukon Denali (daily)

Members met list: SCOTI, darkhorse970, 67cheby, 67cheby'sGirl, klmore, porterbuilt, n2billet, Fastrucken, classicchev, Col Clank, GSFMECH, HuggerCST, Spray-Bomb, BACKYARD88, 5150, fine69, fatbass, smbrouss70, 65StreetCruiser, GAc10boy
gringoloco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2018, 08:46 AM   #114
TA_C10
Registered User
 
TA_C10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,353
Re: Speed Engineering LS Swap Headers Findings

Did everyone use the front holes or rear holes for your engine stands? I have the performance online tube stands with sliders and mounted in the rear frame holes. Engine slid all the way forward. The long tube 1 3/4 hit the clam shell design mount on the driver's side. Looks like I'm going to have to move my stands to the front frame holes and slide the engine back instead so they clear the driver's side...

LM7 5.3 motor
POL tubular engine stands
POL engine slider mounts(clamshell)
Speed Engineering 25-1025 long tube headers


__________________
TA_C10 Stage 1 build - http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=8333444

"It's only money".

Last edited by TA_C10; 03-01-2019 at 03:30 PM.
TA_C10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2018, 11:46 AM   #115
TA_C10
Registered User
 
TA_C10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,353
Re: Speed Engineering LS Swap Headers Findings

Bueller...

Update. I slid the engine all the way back, my block adapters have the 2" slides. This worked to get the headers to clear the clamshell motor mount on driver's side. However I'm worried I might not have the cab clearance if I don't move my engine stands to front frame holes. My new stands cause me to drill new holes in cross member if I move them to front holes. Plus my stock truck oil pan may hit I dunno, it's gonna be close...
__________________
TA_C10 Stage 1 build - http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=8333444

"It's only money".
TA_C10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2018, 12:39 PM   #116
1971Stepside
Almost Satisfied
 
1971Stepside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 2,928
Re: Speed Engineering LS Swap Headers Findings

I put my POL stands in the front holes on the frame.
Attached Images
 
__________________
1971 C10 Stepside. LSx 6.0 with BTR Stage IV, Speed Engineering Headers, 4L80e transmission w/3200 Circle-D Stall. 3.73. Posi. Purchased this truck when I was 17. I started the rebuild (or take apart) in 1993. I have drug it around all over the country in pieces. Finally back on the road in 2021.

"I can't complain, but sometimes I still do. Life's been good to me so far."
1971Stepside is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2018, 02:26 PM   #117
Andler2008
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Amelia, Ohio
Posts: 38
Re: Speed Engineering LS Swap Headers Findings

Has anyone used the Speed Engineering Headers with an SM465 2wd? And does the C10, C20 and C30 all have the same clearance for headers? I see a lot of C10 swap headers, but I don't see anything for C30.
__________________
1984 C30 Crew Cab/Long Bed Dually -- 5.3 LM7/SM465 Build Thread Here:http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=772972
Andler2008 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2018, 01:38 AM   #118
62chevy302
hillbilly
 
62chevy302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: hampton,tn
Posts: 459
Re: Speed Engineering LS Swap Headers Findings

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1971Stepside View Post
I put my POL stands in the front holes on the frame.
Wow that looks awesome
__________________
-1962 C-10
62chevy302 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2018, 02:18 PM   #119
Andler2008
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Amelia, Ohio
Posts: 38
Re: Speed Engineering LS Swap Headers Findings

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andler2008 View Post
Has anyone used the Speed Engineering Headers with an SM465 2wd? And does the C10, C20 and C30 all have the same clearance for headers? I see a lot of C10 swap headers, but I don't see anything for C30.
I can confirm the LT's will fit a C30, but not with the SM465 external push-type slave cylinder.

I just installed mine, passenger fit like a charm, no problem. Gives plenty of room for the starter too.

Driver side headers hit the slave cylinder. If the slave was 2" shorter in length, I think they'd fit. It'd be super close, but they'd bolt on.
__________________
1984 C30 Crew Cab/Long Bed Dually -- 5.3 LM7/SM465 Build Thread Here:http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=772972
Andler2008 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2018, 03:16 PM   #120
Macdaddy1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Niceville Florida
Posts: 347
Re: Speed Engineering LS Swap Headers Findings

I had to go with the speed engineering ram horn headers for my 65 c10 as all of the others hit my external slave cylinder. The ram horn headers drop down nice and avoid everything. The exhaust guy will have to finish it off.
Macdaddy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2019, 03:25 PM   #121
TA_C10
Registered User
 
TA_C10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,353
Re: Speed Engineering LS Swap Headers Findings

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1971Stepside View Post
I put my POL stands in the front holes on the frame.
1971Stepside, can you post a picture or 2 of your drivers side? I ended up sliding the engine all the way back(engine mount sliders) and its better but still just barely is hitting the top of the clamshell mount. Problem is it touches the metal right above the bolt/nut so if I clearance the clamshell then the nylock nut I'm afraid would melt....


__________________
TA_C10 Stage 1 build - http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=8333444

"It's only money".
TA_C10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2019, 03:53 PM   #122
michael bustamante
Senior Member
 
michael bustamante's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Albuquerque NM
Posts: 7,814
Re: Speed Engineering LS Swap Headers Findings

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1971Stepside View Post
I put my POL stands in the front holes on the frame.
I did the same and used an f body camaro oil pan. the pan barely clears the crossmember but it clears!! header long tubes fit well but the same closeness to the block as the rest of you. no gaskets yet though!
__________________
1967custom
michael bustamante is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2019, 02:20 PM   #123
TA_C10
Registered User
 
TA_C10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,353
Re: Speed Engineering LS Swap Headers Findings

Here is what I am talking about. It won't matter if my engine mounts are in the front holes or rear holes, it has to do with the sliders and the clamshell mounts and their location.

I slid my engine back in the adapters as far as it goes(2" sliders) and its just barely hitting the clamshell. I'm just holding the headers up so they aren't perfect but you get the idea. I can't modify the clamshell because the lock-nut is directly below the area the header is touching and i'm afraid the heat will melt the nylon in the nut after a good heat soak. I also want to wrap the headers in heat wrap so I need room to do that too. So I guess I am going to have to clearance the front tube a little to make this work.... I just hate doing this if I didn't have to...







__________________
TA_C10 Stage 1 build - http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=8333444

"It's only money".
TA_C10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2019, 03:19 PM   #124
crakarjax
Registered User
 
crakarjax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 1,302
Re: Speed Engineering LS Swap Headers Findings

I would just clearance the clam shells, just grind slow and should be just fine. if you're worried about the nylon nuts just take them out before you do it.
__________________
1968 LWB C20 / AC / Wood Bed
crakarjax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2019, 03:57 PM   #125
TA_C10
Registered User
 
TA_C10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,353
Re: Speed Engineering LS Swap Headers Findings

Quote:
Originally Posted by crakarjax View Post
I would just clearance the clam shells, just grind slow and should be just fine. if you're worried about the nylon nuts just take them out before you do it.
Actually I'm worried about the header heat when engine running during driving melting the nylon nylocks rather than the grinding process. If I clearance out the clamshell top shelf the header will definitely fit, but it will be about 3/16" away from the top of that nylock nut.

Thoughts? Not sure header wrap will clear 3/16" gap, it will be touching yeah?

__________________
TA_C10 Stage 1 build - http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=8333444

"It's only money".
TA_C10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com