Cam vs mpg - The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

09-11-2017, 04:31 PM

#20

BossHogg69

motor exploder

Join Date: Mar 2009

Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Posts: 2,346

Re: Cam vs mpg

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sawlog

I know I know, I was just wanting to go 216 216@ .5. 110 lsa. Sounds like I better leave well enough alone.

Going to a 216* can @ .050" really isn't going to give you much 'lope' at all.
You might be able to tell that it has a mild cam, but definitely not the fender shaking crackle/thump/lope that you might be hearing in your head.

Just leave it like it is and enjoy a reliable daily driver with the good mpg you're getting now.

__________________
Adam

1969 Chevy CST/10 stepside, DART Big M/TREMEC Magnum Extreme/3.73's w/Detroit Truetrac
1965 Chevy Bel Air Wagon (daily driver), 327/TH350,10 bolt w/3.08's
1961 Chevy Bel Air Sport Coupe, ZZ454/M21/9" rear w/3.50's & Detroit Truetrac
2005 GMC 1500 ccsb 2wd, 6.0L/4L65e/3.73 G80
2006 GMC 2500HD ccsb 4x4, DMax LBZ/Allison 6spd/4.56's w/Detroit TrueTrac

Use the SEARCH function on this forum - it is your friend!!

Last edited by BossHogg69; 09-11-2017 at 10:49 PM.

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:50 PM.



Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.