10-20-2018, 05:48 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Calhoun,ga
Posts: 139
|
73-87 vs 88-9?
Im wondering how the two stack up against each other in reliability and parts
How they handle drive how tough they are my family has never had the newer style And i like simple but im thinking i might save money by just buying a driver the one i have now Is going to take some time to fix and about the same money. ... Im thinking maybe 88-89 z71 shortbox ?? Let me know how the two compare right now ive got an 86 k10 th350 350 |
10-20-2018, 06:48 PM | #2 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Cherryville, NC
Posts: 2,155
|
Re: 73-87 vs 88-9?
Why not consider a 2001=2006 Z71 .....
I have had one now for 8 years...very little issues
__________________
Family and country before all others... 2006 Chevy Silverado (Daily Driver) 2012 Chevy Equinox |
10-20-2018, 08:31 PM | #3 |
State of Confusion!
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gulfport, MS USA
Posts: 46,640
|
Re: 73-87 vs 88-9?
88-98 are good. More leg room and I think a better ride. Engine reliability about same as the squarebody. I have never like the brakes on the 88-98 years. even with the MC changes, the brakes always felt soft. I think the squares have better brakes.
I agree that if you are looking for a DD type ride, you might be better off with one of the 99-2007 years. I prefer the 99-2002 myself. Cleaner looks and depending on the model less gadgets to tell me things I don't wanna know.
__________________
Bill 1970 Chevy Custom/10 LWB Fleetside 2010 Toyota Tacoma PreRunner SR5 Double Cab - DD Member of Louisiana Classic Truck Club (LCTC) Bill's Gallery Life isn't tied with a bow, but it's still a gift. Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Leave the rest to God! Last edited by Palf70Step; 10-21-2018 at 07:36 AM. |
10-20-2018, 11:01 PM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Moss Bluff, LA
Posts: 381
|
Re: 73-87 vs 88-9?
KEEP YOURS and insert an 88-94 bench seat...keeping your self rid of older electronics saves major head aches.
|
10-22-2018, 03:42 PM | #5 | |
driving is in my blood
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mesa AZ
Posts: 5,692
|
Re: 73-87 vs 88-9?
Quote:
73-87's are crap daily drivers. The 88-98 is better in every way when it comes to that. Carb's are the work of the devil.
__________________
-78 c10 short/step: 388cid, M20, 5/5 drop, lots more. Playtoy and first vehicle. -98 c1500 x-cab: 5.7L, 17" rims, 5/6 drop, flowmaster, helper bags,NBS rear disk brakes. -02 Suburban 4x4: leveled front -CBR600F4i, CBR600RR, CBR1000RR, and standup skis DISCLAIMER: I cant spell for the life of me. |
|
10-22-2018, 06:51 PM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Moss Bluff, LA
Posts: 381
|
Re: 73-87 vs 88-9?
i can agree slightly...what do you do when your ecu dies out ???
swap to ??? so, like in my case...i went standalone efi (should last 15yrs hopefully), and i am in the process of deleting all unnecessary wiring. my comment was in reference to WHAT HE ALREADY HAS...and a good tuned carb will probably and has been shown to outperform some efi units. |
10-23-2018, 12:04 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Carpenter, Wyoming
Posts: 83
|
Re: 73-87 vs 88-9?
I have owned both. I had a standard cab and bed automatic 1975 and I am now rebuilding a 1996 short bed standard cab manual. The 75 was a gas hog. No matter how you tuned it up and drove economically it at best would get 11 miles per gallon on the highway. The 96 is amazing, getting a solid 22 miles per gallon. It should be noted that the 96 does not have air, and is a base model as well as a short bed making it hundreds of pounds lighter. I don't like the computer stuff but the horsepower and mileage is hard discount. My choice would be 96 to 98.
|
10-23-2018, 12:14 PM | #8 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Santa Maria, Calif.
Posts: 781
|
Re: 73-87 vs 88-9?
Quote:
__________________
1989 K1500 Chev. EC Original owner; some of the aftermarket parts I've installed are Borla headers, Hypertech chip, Edelbrock water pump, and a Stillen rear disc brake conversion kit. 2009 Hummer H3T 3.7L 5M (sold) 1997 K2500 Chev. EC 7.4L/ 4L80E 2018 Dodge Ram 2500 HD R/C |
|
10-23-2018, 12:25 PM | #9 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Santa Maria, Calif.
Posts: 781
|
Re: 73-87 vs 88-9?
Quote:
__________________
1989 K1500 Chev. EC Original owner; some of the aftermarket parts I've installed are Borla headers, Hypertech chip, Edelbrock water pump, and a Stillen rear disc brake conversion kit. 2009 Hummer H3T 3.7L 5M (sold) 1997 K2500 Chev. EC 7.4L/ 4L80E 2018 Dodge Ram 2500 HD R/C |
|
10-23-2018, 12:33 PM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Parkville, MD
Posts: 1,024
|
Re: 73-87 vs 88-9?
Over the years, between me and my father, we've had about a dozen of these trucks ranging between 1970 and 1999.
Reliability and parts has been about the same for both generations. Rust is the biggest killer. Overall, extremely reliable. If you are going 4wd, in the later years they moved to IFS, which gives a smoother ride. Not sure what year they changed over. 1996 they changed to Vortec heads. You have a TH350, so I would certainly look for a truck with a 4 speed (700R4, or 4L60E) if you regularly drive over 50 mph.
__________________
1970 C20 Custom Camper - 350, TH350 1997 GMC Suburban 1994 Acura Integra GSR 1987 Dodge Daytona Shelby Z |
10-23-2018, 02:38 PM | #11 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Motor City
Posts: 9,149
|
Re: 73-87 vs 88-9?
Quote:
Fuel Injected V6, manual overdrive trans, 3.73 gears, power steering, power brakes, a/c. Basically a GMT400 vehicle wrapped in vintage sheet metal. K
__________________
Chevrolet Flint Assembly 1979-1986 GM Full Size Truck Engineering 1986 - 2019 Intro from an Old Assembly Guy: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=342926 My Pontiac story: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=560524 Chevelle intro: http://www.superchevy.com/features/s...hevy-chevelle/ |
|
10-23-2018, 02:40 PM | #12 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Motor City
Posts: 9,149
|
Re: 73-87 vs 88-9?
Quote:
Sold it when I became a company vehicle driver....and then bought the '87 when they took the company vehicle away. K
__________________
Chevrolet Flint Assembly 1979-1986 GM Full Size Truck Engineering 1986 - 2019 Intro from an Old Assembly Guy: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=342926 My Pontiac story: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=560524 Chevelle intro: http://www.superchevy.com/features/s...hevy-chevelle/ |
|
10-24-2018, 07:55 PM | #13 |
Who Me?
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Royal Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 4,065
|
Re: 73-87 vs 88-9?
Ive had a 79 Silverado in the past and currently have a 97 Tahoe.. Love them both!
__________________
Steve 1997 Tahoe LT 4D 2WD (DD) 1961 Apache 10 (sold) 1965 C10 Stepper (sold) |
10-24-2018, 11:09 PM | #14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: wheaton IL
Posts: 659
|
Re: 73-87 vs 88-9?
I own both. Have a 86 k30 and a 1990 c1500 I've had for a daily driver for 10 years. Both have been instantly reliable. Neither have been on a tow truck , the 90 I got around 172k and has around 240k on it now. Other then just normal ol stuff neither have left me stranded . Soon as the rust claims the 90 in a year or two, it's pretty rough , I'm going to buy another one . Before 10 years ago I always had 80s trucks as daily drivers and again never left me stranded
I thought about getting another 80s for a daily driver but the prices are insane in the Midwest , obs trucks are still pretty cheap |
10-25-2018, 07:33 PM | #15 | ||
driving is in my blood
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mesa AZ
Posts: 5,692
|
Re: 73-87 vs 88-9?
Quote:
Quote:
Both styles are great trucks, but the OP asked which is a better daily. I've daily driven both styles my entire driving life so 20yrs now.
__________________
-78 c10 short/step: 388cid, M20, 5/5 drop, lots more. Playtoy and first vehicle. -98 c1500 x-cab: 5.7L, 17" rims, 5/6 drop, flowmaster, helper bags,NBS rear disk brakes. -02 Suburban 4x4: leveled front -CBR600F4i, CBR600RR, CBR1000RR, and standup skis DISCLAIMER: I cant spell for the life of me. |
||
11-04-2018, 10:03 PM | #16 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: hickory, ky
Posts: 1,250
|
Re: 73-87 vs 88-9?
I've had at least 15 square bodies in my lifetime, albeit most of them were SWB 4wd trucks, and I have owned an 88/90/93/97 one ton dually and have had a 98 Z71 reg cab swb for over 15 years and now daily driving a 94 swb. I would not flip a nickel for difference in looks, I love them all. My 98 was 5 years old when I bought it for $11,500. A radiator, 2 trannies, intake gasket, and rebuilding the AC system last year. All that over a span of 15 years and that was all the major maintenance items on the truck. We took it to Pigeon Forge in Sept,(650 miles) both ways without a hitch. 202K miles and I trust it to go anywhere. Does that make it a better driver than a 73-87? Absolutely not. It all has to do with a WELL maintained pickup that earns your trust. You have to spend a little time under the hood to get the daily driver you want. Good luck.
__________________
:My build thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=807535 1971 c10 swb/1972 K10 swb/1968 Camaro 350/4spd 1955 210 2 dr sedan/1998 RCSB Z71 |
Bookmarks |
|
|