The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-29-2018, 11:44 PM   #1
johnwaynejeep
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Pacific Grove, CA
Posts: 105
Lower Ball joint myth?

All,

I'm replacing my lower ball joints and need help confirming or expelling a myth.

I recall hearing that new lower ball joints are several thou larger in diameter then original to make a solid fit. Because of this the lower control arms become expanded. I heard that the lower ball joints can only be replaced once. After the 1st ball joint replacement, the entire control arm needs to be replaced during the next lower ball joint service.

Is this true? I can't find any specs on the OE versus replacement ball joint diameters.

Thanks in advance
Robert

P.S. I'm also replacing my upper ball joints, control arm bushings, inner and outer tie rod ends and my idler arm. Then I'm doing an alignment. Full front service.
__________________
Robert
1975 C10 - Huckleberry
2007 Jeep JK - John Wayne Jeep
Smittybilt front/rear bumper, 10K winch
Pacific Grove, CA
johnwaynejeep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2018, 07:31 AM   #2
zach_carver
Registered User
 
zach_carver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Blue Ridge,GA
Posts: 508
Re: Lower Ball joint myth?

Ive rebuilt quite a few front suspensions but Ive never heard that. Some of these trucks may have had lots of ball joints over the years but Ive never noticed any difference all have to be pressed in and out.
__________________
1965 C10 LS2/4l70, WHITE, 5/7 DROP

LINK TO SUPER SNOOPY C10 BUILD---> http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=689283

1977 C10 SILVERADO HAWAIIAN BLUE, 5/5" DROP, LS6/4L80E

1976 CHEVY K5, 350/350, YUBA GOLD/SADDLE
zach_carver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2018, 09:08 AM   #3
D13
Registered User
 
D13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Memphis MI
Posts: 1,851
Re: Lower Ball joint myth?

Moog problem solvers are oversized to deal with arm pockets that have been enlarged over the years. Most ball joints are not.
__________________
1987 2 ton
1982 250/TH350 beater in progress
Dad's 1981 3/4 L6 3 on tree posi and no options, awaiting restoration or scrapping
Plus a mess o' tractors
D13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2018, 04:34 PM   #4
cruizin01
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Cbus, Ohio
Posts: 290
Re: Lower Ball joint myth?

I still had problems with the Moog joints being loose in my control arms. I tried a couple different brands with the same results. I ended up welding them in place. When the time comes Ill replace the arms next time.
__________________
'78 C10 Build
cruizin01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2018, 04:41 PM   #5
TrailerTrash
Registered User
 
TrailerTrash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: PA
Posts: 441
Re: Lower Ball joint myth?

Quote:
Originally Posted by cruizin01 View Post
I still had problems with the Moog joints being loose in my control arms. I tried a couple different brands with the same results. I ended up welding them in place. When the time comes Ill replace the arms next time.
I had this exact problem and solved it this exact way
__________________
- When the Reaper makes his deal, trust in your steel -

'77 C10 350/350 2/4 drop and a mild street engine
TrailerTrash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2018, 08:48 PM   #6
sweetk30
Registered User
 
sweetk30's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: horseheads,ny rust belt
Posts: 2,794
Re: Lower Ball joint myth?

dodge with the screw in had this problem real bad back in the day .

i have never had much problem with other brands of vehicle .
__________________
77-k30lb BIG truck build .
87-k30lb budget beater build .
85-k30lb the plow machine build .
85-c10sb summer fun toy .
-----------------------------
HOLLEY SNIPER efi = worst case of p.i.t.a i ever had .

EDELBROCK pro flo 4 = best deal going so far . love my setup works great.
sweetk30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com