The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Racing and high performance (trucks haulin more than hay)

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-29-2013, 01:12 PM   #26
vidman
Registered User
 
vidman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Fitchburg,Mass
Posts: 737
Re: Fat Blocks and Rear Ends

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marv D View Post
Ohhh if were gonna play show and tell

lol
I don't think you'd break this,, it's surviving 790horse, 1.2x sixty's in a 3000 pound chassis, tansbrake, wheels up launch and tripping the 60' timers with the rear tires


It's only

On the more mild (and affordable side of the 9"
I've beat on the 9" in my 66 with 666HP, big slicks, Iron aftermarket centersection, Richmond street gears, Dyneer No-spin locker. No failures yet with 3650pounds, 1.4x sixtys on a transbrake launch. EXCEPT axle,, 2 Strange 35spline axles, and one Dutchmans axle, now I'm running Mark Williams axles in everything and (knock on wood) I can't seem to tear them up.... waiting for the next weaker link to surface.

There are a lot of 9" haters out there and the little extra HP it takes because of the pinion placement, all sorts of technical excusses to not use a 9", BUT the fact remains the 9" has become the 'SOP' for hotrodders and racers. Parts are more plentiful and engineered / re-ingineered and re-re-re engineered that the 60 or so years they have been around they are about as bulletproof as anything out there,, and cheaper than anything else to build. (With 'cheap' being a relative term obviously).

The 9" is has become like the Miscrosot of rear ends... just about EVERYBODY carries a program for them,, and just about every parts house has the pieces to put one back together if something fails. The aftermarket proliferation of quality ad affordable pieces make the 9" a no brainer IMPO if your starting from scratch. Pick a wheel, then have the rear built to fit.

You get what you pay for,,, anywhere from around $1300 to $3800 depending on internals, brakes, bracketry, axles.. bla bla bla




BTW, keep in mind not all "14 - 16" tires" are created eaqual. I owned a set of MT Sportsmans once. A little 380HP 355 would blacktrack to 1/2 track with a best of 2.15 sixty foot times. A change to a Hoosier QT street tire was good for nearly 1/2 a second to the 60'. Hard as nails 'built fore looks' street tires just aren't going to hook and hurt parts. Changing from the MT Sportsman to the Hoosier QT was good for 3 axles, 2 u-joints, a driveshaft........... It's a very slippery slope
Thats different that Strange uses the two sizes of bolts. are they stagered 1/2 and 5/8 or 5/8 and 3/4 threads.. not much room for a socket in there. I spent about an hour last night looking at Mark Williams # 24 catalog. very very impressive products they have there
__________________
62 Willys 4wd Pickup : 72 C-10 swb 504 stroker 09 Taco 3" lift 33" tires: 90 K-5 blazer (plow truck): RIP Ross Little brother
vidman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2013, 12:25 AM   #27
Marv D
Registered Truck Offender
 
Marv D's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: hells training ground (aka Ariz)
Posts: 3,118
Re: Fat Blocks and Rear Ends

That's their pro gear and spool setup. They claim good to 1500HP and 7seconds in a 2500 pound chassis. I've torn up lost of stuff in the low 9 second Nova,, but not a hint of trouble from the rear. Yes they are staggered, and exactly because of the issue you said,, no access to the bolts. Also I'm assuming they were looking for additional clamping to avoid gear deflection, without taking away from the mass with all large holes?/ I have no idea really, you'd have to ask the engineers. They design / build it,, I just try to destroy it. LOL
__________________
Still playin with trucks, even at my age!

When you're dead, it's only a problem for the people around you, because you don't know you're dead.
.....It's kinda the same when your STUPID.


I just did my taxes and reviewed my SS statement. Thanks to the current administration it looks like I will only have to work till noon on the day of my funeral.
Marv D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2013, 09:16 AM   #28
vidman
Registered User
 
vidman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Fitchburg,Mass
Posts: 737
Re: Fat Blocks and Rear Ends

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marv D View Post
That's their pro gear and spool setup. They claim good to 1500HP and 7seconds in a 2500 pound chassis. I've torn up lost of stuff in the low 9 second Nova,, but not a hint of trouble from the rear. Yes they are staggered, and exactly because of the issue you said,, no access to the bolts. Also I'm assuming they were looking for additional clamping to avoid gear deflection, without taking away from the mass with all large holes?/ I have no idea really, you'd have to ask the engineers. They design / build it,, I just try to destroy it. LOL
I guess you will have to go faster and try harder...LOL
__________________
62 Willys 4wd Pickup : 72 C-10 swb 504 stroker 09 Taco 3" lift 33" tires: 90 K-5 blazer (plow truck): RIP Ross Little brother
vidman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2013, 10:11 PM   #29
skeeterbug
Registered User
 
skeeterbug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: watertown, tn
Posts: 332
Re: Fat Blocks and Rear Ends

I'll bet that even though it cost us our hard earned money, everytime we break parts like rears in our trucks we grin and thump our chest deep down inside? I know i'm guilty of it.
__________________
'71 LWB c10-"WORK" in progress
385 ci 4 bolt (4.040 bore), scat 6.0" forged h beams,scat forged crank 3.750, speed pro 5cc flat top, clevite bearings, .039 head gaskets,comp xr288hr 110* 288/294adv. 236/242@.50 555/576 lift, pbm hyd roller lifters, chad spiers 215cc imp. heads , comp 1.6 roler rockers, comp magnum push rods, edelbrock victor jr. single plane intake p&p (1206 gasket matched), quickfuel 750R DP , th 350 trans, 5.14 gear, 3000 stall

2012 best 1/8- 7.70 @ 87mph 1.70 60' (lil better)
2013 best 7.39
2014 best-7.38

New for 2013-strange rear coilovers, headman 1-3/4 headers, 5.13 r&p, .060 aluminum bed floor, 15x14 holeshots w/ 31x18.5 hoosier dot pro's, 15x4 holeshots w/ 26x5.5 m/t skinnies and 200+#'s in body weight loss & 6 point cage
skeeterbug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2013, 05:18 PM   #30
vidman
Registered User
 
vidman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Fitchburg,Mass
Posts: 737
Re: Fat Blocks and Rear Ends

Quote:
Originally Posted by skeeterbug View Post
I'll bet that even though it cost us our hard earned money, everytime we break parts like rears in our trucks we grin and thump our chest deep down inside? I know i'm guilty of it.
Ya me too, I,m also guilty and thats why one of my best friends has 6 hooks and 3 flatbeds and he loves cold beer..
__________________
62 Willys 4wd Pickup : 72 C-10 swb 504 stroker 09 Taco 3" lift 33" tires: 90 K-5 blazer (plow truck): RIP Ross Little brother
vidman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2013, 03:57 AM   #31
moggey01
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 315
Re: Fat Blocks and Rear Ends

Im using a Rick Jones chromo housing with 3.5 axle tubes. It sounds crazy but people tested with shock sensors attached to the axle tubes on each side. They discovered the tubes where flexing going down the track. Jeg Coughlin was one of them , Greg Stanfield was another. When the new rear end was built with more bracing and bigger tubes, both cars picked up almost .5 a tenth. That is huge in Pro Stock , and the cars are only 2300lbs. I may add some turbos at some point so I wanted to start with something stout to begin with.
moggey01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2013, 06:36 PM   #32
vidman
Registered User
 
vidman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Fitchburg,Mass
Posts: 737
Re: Fat Blocks and Rear Ends

I am still debating on what to use. i know that i will not use the factory 12 bolt, knowing that it will explode with my motor that I,m running. that said i,m still looking at different aftermarket axle builders to see how much i have to spend to make it all work. The number one thing is that i do not want an axle that will not hold up. being stranded on the side of the road is not an option...
__________________
62 Willys 4wd Pickup : 72 C-10 swb 504 stroker 09 Taco 3" lift 33" tires: 90 K-5 blazer (plow truck): RIP Ross Little brother
vidman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2013, 04:55 PM   #33
KQQL IT
At the body shop.
 
KQQL IT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Land of fruits and nuts.
Posts: 5,131
Re: Fat Blocks and Rear Ends

Did a eBay 9" with ex NASCAR stuff on the cheap. 3.25" bearing 31 spline Detroit locker for 200$ and 3:82 edm polished ring and pinion for 79$
Havnt killed it yet 1.67 60' @ 4160lbs and street miles.
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
" That didnt make it any newer "
" Dont antique the equipment "
KQQL IT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2013, 06:01 PM   #34
vidman
Registered User
 
vidman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Fitchburg,Mass
Posts: 737
Re: Fat Blocks and Rear Ends

Ya i have been looking at some of the Nascar stuff, Just not seen one I like yet. and some of the prices are cheap..
__________________
62 Willys 4wd Pickup : 72 C-10 swb 504 stroker 09 Taco 3" lift 33" tires: 90 K-5 blazer (plow truck): RIP Ross Little brother
vidman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com