The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-06-2016, 04:48 PM   #1
Voodoo556
Registered User
 
Voodoo556's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Central Coast, California
Posts: 207
Rut Row, that doesn't look good!

So the PO of the '70 k20 I picked up last weekend had told me it had a starter issue. He said it needed to be shimmed. Well, it needs to be shimmed alright lol.



There is a chunk of the engine block casting that is missing. I'm assuming it is possible that was caused from him over tightening the bolts. Maybe with an impact or a 3ft cheater bar!
The bolt still tightens but I'm struggling to get the starter dialed in/lined up so it does not bind, screech or drag. I definitely do not want this to be an on going problem.
I'm thinking I might be able to get her shimmed correctly, add a rear support brace to block and then add some blue never seize.

So, what to do.
Options:
Attempt to shim and never seize.
Yank the motor and attempt to "fix"
Yank motor and replace with another short block or complete motor
Yank and replace with big block

Any thoughts fellas?
Thanks
Voodoo556 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2016, 04:51 PM   #2
The Chainsaw
Registered User
 
The Chainsaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Orland, CA
Posts: 103
Re: Rut Row, that doesn't look good!

Small broken piece? Definitely replace with the big block






Not making fun, it's what I would do. Although I might have a problem.
The Chainsaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2016, 05:07 PM   #3
Voodoo556
Registered User
 
Voodoo556's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Central Coast, California
Posts: 207
Re: Rut Row, that doesn't look good!

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Chainsaw View Post
Small broken piece? Definitely replace with the big block






Not making fun, it's what I would do. Although I might have a problem.
Yeah there is a small piece that is broken off, not just a crack.
Simplest would be to toss another small block in but damn, I'm torn.....fighting the demons of a big block.
Voodoo556 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2016, 05:17 PM   #4
dazza
Registered User
 
dazza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: California
Posts: 971
Re: Rut Row, that doesn't look good!

he must have had one of his 'chiks' torque'n on that thing!
__________________
---------------------------------------------------------
I'm not crazy, I'm chosen, there's a difference.
----------------------------
'72 K10 SWB, 350, sm465/np205
---- ----
dazza is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2016, 05:19 PM   #5
Voodoo556
Registered User
 
Voodoo556's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Central Coast, California
Posts: 207
Re: Rut Row, that doesn't look good!

Quote:
Originally Posted by dazza View Post
he must have had one of his 'chiks' torque'n on that thing!
Well odds are it was probably a purdy dang healthy gal!
Voodoo556 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2016, 05:32 PM   #6
MARKDTN
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 2,131
Re: Rut Row, that doesn't look good!

Could you use a mini-starter and the other set of holes?
__________________
'83 K20-TPI
'73 C10
'79 C10-ex-diesel(SOLD)
'07 Tahoe(Son driving)
'14 Suburban-DD
'71 C10-current project
MARKDTN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2016, 05:56 PM   #7
Voodoo556
Registered User
 
Voodoo556's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Central Coast, California
Posts: 207
Re: Rut Row, that doesn't look good!

Quote:
Originally Posted by MARKDTN View Post
Could you use a mini-starter and the other set of holes?
I bought a high torque mini starter but it uses the same hole as the Orig starter
Voodoo556 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2016, 06:07 PM   #8
michael bustamante
Senior Member
 
michael bustamante's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Albuquerque NM
Posts: 7,814
Re: Rut Row, that doesn't look good!

yup id find the starter brace and never seize too til i found a built up 454!!
__________________
1967custom
michael bustamante is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2016, 06:10 PM   #9
Voodoo556
Registered User
 
Voodoo556's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Central Coast, California
Posts: 207
Re: Rut Row, that doesn't look good!

Quote:
Originally Posted by michael bustamante View Post
yup id find the starter brace and never seize too til i found a built up 454!!
I think that's a good choice. I don't really want to yank the motor just because of the starter and the chunk out of the casting. I'd like to fix it and then I can start a build on a bb or a nice sb.
Voodoo556 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2016, 07:08 PM   #10
trac209
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 1,107
Re: Rut Row, that doesn't look good!

I had this happen long ago and I fixed it by jb welding a stud it there and using a nut to tighten starter
trac209 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2016, 10:06 PM   #11
Mike C
Registered User
 
Mike C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Austin, TX, USA
Posts: 7,709
Re: Rut Row, that doesn't look good!

Yup, try and drill hole deeper and tap for a stud. Locktight in there and pray.
__________________
44 Willys MB
52 M38A1
64 Corvette Coupe
68 Camaro 'vert LT1 & TH700
69 Z/28 355 12.6's @110
69 Chevy Short Step 4 1/2"/7" drop
72 Jimmy 4WD 4spd 4" & 35's
02 GMC 2500HD 4x4 Duramax
Mike C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2016, 10:45 PM   #12
El Dorado Jim
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: El Dorado Ca
Posts: 3,374
Re: Rut Row, that doesn't look good!

I would go with the stud and jb weld fix if it was me
El Dorado Jim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2016, 10:56 PM   #13
72ironmike
Senior Member
 
72ironmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Olathe KS (Greater Kansas City MO Area)
Posts: 2,057
Re: Rut Row, that doesn't look good!

Can the block be ground even to allow room for a very thick washer or sleeve ?
72ironmike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2016, 11:38 PM   #14
dazza
Registered User
 
dazza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: California
Posts: 971
Re: Rut Row, that doesn't look good!

just always park on hill and keep one of the po's chiks in the back... bump starts made easy...

but better yet, you could try one of these... adapter
__________________
---------------------------------------------------------
I'm not crazy, I'm chosen, there's a difference.
----------------------------
'72 K10 SWB, 350, sm465/np205
---- ----
dazza is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2016, 12:38 AM   #15
Voodoo556
Registered User
 
Voodoo556's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Central Coast, California
Posts: 207
Re: Rut Row, that doesn't look good!

Quote:
Originally Posted by dazza View Post
just always park on hill and keep one of the po's chiks in the back... bump starts made easy...

but better yet, you could try one of these... adapter
I was looking at this adapter this afternoon, I think that's the ticket right there. Done, problem solved.
Voodoo556 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2016, 02:03 AM   #16
57taskforce
All about them K’s
 
57taskforce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Farmington, New Mexico
Posts: 6,229
Re: Rut Row, that doesn't look good!

I'd bet on that starter bolt backing out a bit first then somebody cranked it over with the bolt loose and broke the block and probably the bolt too. I've seen it happen before. As for fixing it, either the adapter or stud would probably work pretty good.
__________________
Tyler
'57 3100 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=813888
'72 K20 Cheyenne http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=662879
‘69 K10 SWB http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=805206
'98 Silverado LT K2500HD ECLB Vortec 454/4l80E: 6" lift 315/75/16's
‘87 IROC-Z all original 50K mile survivor TPI 305 IROC Blue
‘10 Camaro 2SS/RS Aqua Blue Metallic #93 -version 2.0
57taskforce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2016, 07:47 AM   #17
hamjet
Registered User
 
hamjet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: South Westerlo, New York
Posts: 1,325
Re: Rut Row, that doesn't look good!

Is the adapter for 153 or 168 tooth flywheel? or either. whats yours?
__________________
Thanks, Joe..
1969 C/10, 348 C.I., 3X2 bbl. V8, 2004r , LWB.
hamjet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2016, 10:25 AM   #18
bill3rail
Registered User
 
bill3rail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: LI, NY 11801
Posts: 1,140
Re: Rut Row, that doesn't look good!

Quote:
Originally Posted by trac209 View Post
I had this happen long ago and I fixed it by jb welding a stud it there and using a nut to tighten starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Dorado Jim View Post
I would go with the stud and jb weld fix if it was me
Sounds amazingly simple, and I would do it if needed.

Bill
__________________
1970 C10 8' Fleetside, L6 250, 3 on the Tree.
The most basic of pickup trucks!
bill3rail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2016, 10:30 AM   #19
72kool
Registered User
 
72kool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: kearney nebraska
Posts: 613
Re: Rut Row, that doesn't look good!

with it broken like that, the only option i see is a big block. sorry to deliver you this terrible news.
72kool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2016, 11:52 AM   #20
Cajun
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Buda, Tx
Posts: 32
Re: Rut Row, that doesn't look good!

I had this same problem on my drag car motor. Since I already had the SBC parts replacing with a BBC just wasn't in the budget. I was able to find a machine shop who was the only one in the city that had the right material to match the block composition. I did have to pull the motor and strip it down for him since he put the block in a jig and added new material to the broken tab and filled it in completely and then drilled and tapped the hole for the bolt. This was a 14.1 compression motor with a mini gear reduction starter. Never had a problem for the 10 years I had it. Of course the BBC would have been nice too.
Cajun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2016, 12:25 PM   #21
Jason Banks
Senior Member
 
Jason Banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: TX
Posts: 1,517
Re: Rut Row, that doesn't look good!

I also had this happen to a 350...I had someone come out and use some special welding rods for cast iron and weld some material on that I then tapped out for a bolt.


It was a major pain...but the guy welded it with the engine still installed.

A few months after it was fixed the motor self destructed....so I don't know how well it worked long term.

I like the JB weld and a stud idea!
Jason Banks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2016, 02:15 PM   #22
MARKDTN
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 2,131
Re: Rut Row, that doesn't look good!

I would be careful of a stud. There is a reason that the starter bolts are knurled as they are. If you don't use correct bolts it can get misaligned. Studs may cause the same issue. On a standard trans, can't you use a 6cyl bellhousing and put the starter on the bellhousing instead of the block?
__________________
'83 K20-TPI
'73 C10
'79 C10-ex-diesel(SOLD)
'07 Tahoe(Son driving)
'14 Suburban-DD
'71 C10-current project
MARKDTN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2016, 02:55 PM   #23
zeldman
Registered User
 
zeldman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Rt 66 Gallup, NM
Posts: 527
Re: Rut Row, that doesn't look good!

Quote:
Originally Posted by MARKDTN View Post
I would be careful of a stud. There is a reason that the starter bolts are knurled as they are. If you don't use correct bolts it can get misaligned. Studs may cause the same issue. On a standard trans, can't you use a 6cyl bellhousing and put the starter on the bellhousing instead of the block?
Very true.
__________________
2005 GMC K2500HD D/A
1993 GMC K1500
2011 Subaru Legacy.
2013 Subaru Outback
1970 C-10 2WD, SWB stepside, 292, TH350, PS, more rust than anything. God is my pilot.
zeldman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2016, 05:50 PM   #24
Voodoo556
Registered User
 
Voodoo556's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Central Coast, California
Posts: 207
Re: Rut Row, that doesn't look good!

I am leaning towards going with the bell housing mounted starter.
Seems to be the most solid, although it involves pulling the motor and trans apart, long term solution.
http://www.crankshaftcoalition.com/w...lock_is_broken
Voodoo556 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com