The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-10-2002, 02:28 PM   #1
COBALT
Senior Member
 
COBALT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Posts: 5,817
Hmmmm....I'm stuck on what to do next.

I'm thinking about doing something with the engine, but I don't know what. I have a 1980 4 bolt main 350 that's completely stock. It has stock heads, and doesn't have much horsepower. To make matters worse it has a 1969 327 2bbl intake manifold and Rochester 2bbl carburetor (with choke pull-off) off of a Camero, El Camino, or whatever, and I've been fighting it since I bought the truck to keep it in tune. Plus, it has what look like the original exhaust manifolds off the original 1969 350 that used to be in the truck, and they've taken some abuse. I'd rather pull them out before they become a problem.

SO....this is what I'm thinking in terms of bolt-ons:

1. Hooker Competition Headers. My exhaust is 2 1/2" from before the mufflers back (straight out the back). I'm thinking 1 5/8" to 2 1/2" collectors would be perfect. The exhaust pipes would be replaced from the collectors to the mufflers.

2. Edelbrock Performer Intake Manifold (non EGR). A basic dual plane one (2101) that'll take a square bore carburetor. Should I go with a performer RPM (7101)???

3. Edelbrock Performer 600 CFM Square Bore Carburetor (Electric choke - 1406). I know a lot of you have had mixed results with this carburetor, but I'm stepping UP to something basic, so I'm willing to try it. How does the choke setup in a '69 convert to an electric choke?

What do you all think?
__________________
'69 3/4 ton C20 2wd-350ci/TH400
'69 3/4 ton Custom 20 2wd-350ci/4sp Manual
'99 2wd 5.7 Chevy Tahoe
Seattle, WA.
COBALT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2002, 03:02 PM   #2
Randy70C-10
Account Suspended
 
Randy70C-10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Virginia Beach, Va. U.S.A.
Posts: 15,320
Going from 2 to 4 barrel will make the biggest noticeable difference. I'd stick with the Performer, it's a better all-around intake for the street.
Randy70C-10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2002, 03:11 PM   #3
Long Knight
Spank 'em if you got 'em!
 
Long Knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 628
No more choke issues, just hook up the hot wire to your ignition switch or (like I did) to the fuse panel. Some people hook up the hot wire to the alt. This is for those who live in low crime areas (unlike me) who can leave their car running and not be in it. Idea is, if it is hooked up to alt and engine dies, choke stops opening. If it is hooked to switch, keeps opening and is mispositioned for engine temp when restarted. Also, I have a lindicator light telling me the choke is getting power (overboard for concern, I know). If you have a lever or pull choke, replace it with the Nitro Button!!!
__________________
Long Knight

'71 C-20, 350ci, TH350, Edl. 1406 Carb w/elec.choke, Ignitor ignition, Viper Tires, Orange Dipstick
Long Knight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2002, 03:15 PM   #4
stllookn
Saving 1 truck at a time!
 
stllookn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kent, WA
Posts: 6,463
Vortec heads, manifold, carb and headers...you will not notice the difference! Do not forget the heads!!!! Check Scroggin Dickey for the kit or call around to some junk yards. The last post I saw claimed a JY purchase price of $300 for used heads. New ones are only $476!
__________________
'68 C20 Longhorn 50th Anniversary 400/TH400
'68 C20 Longhorn 50th Anniversary 468/TH400w/buckets
'72 C20 Halfhorn (Longhorn w/o cab and front clip)
'69 Flxible Cruiser (look up ugly in the dictionary)
stllookn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2002, 08:25 PM   #5
COBALT
Senior Member
 
COBALT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Posts: 5,817
ttt (gotta get all of the afternoon-ers' opinions)

__________________
'69 3/4 ton C20 2wd-350ci/TH400
'69 3/4 ton Custom 20 2wd-350ci/4sp Manual
'99 2wd 5.7 Chevy Tahoe
Seattle, WA.
COBALT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2002, 09:04 PM   #6
neonlarry
Registered User
 
neonlarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Vacaville, CA
Posts: 2,746
If you are going to use the Edelbrock Performer Carb, why not get the EPS manifold instead of the 2101? It is a new design and works better with the performer carb. Also, if you want to get heads, the World Products S/R Torquer heads are about as good as the Vortech heads, and cheaper too.
__________________
70 C/10 Light Red 350/TH350, HEI, Duals w/40 series Flows, 91 seat, LED taillights
99 Pontiac S/C GTP, SLP Ram Air hood, GMPP Konis & springs
95 Neon ACR, MP PCM, AFX UDP, 3.0 CAI
neonlarry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2002, 10:19 PM   #7
lofly'a
Registered User
 
lofly'a's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Alexandria, LA 71301
Posts: 1,450
if you use the performer package, use the cam that goes with it. it'll wake up that mouse a little and give you good driveability and won't kill you on gas mileage.
__________________
-02 avalanche (daily driver)
-66 gto ragtop 389/400 (garage queen, hand-me-down from dad)
-72 Tribute Trans Am (6.0LS/T56 6-speed) in progress
-2003 YUKON (Wife's)
-71 gmc swb fleet (current project, gonna shave everything, bags, stuff w/ 20's, gen III powertrain)
-48 3100 SWB - 12/31/23 LONG TERM Project

Last edited by lofly'a; 12-11-2002 at 01:12 AM.
lofly'a is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2002, 01:44 AM   #8
HotRod929
Registered User
 
HotRod929's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bondurant, IA but in Worcester, MA for school
Posts: 767
Is there something wrong with the performer RPM package. I dont see many people recomending it. I am thinking about putting one on my truck and was wondering why chose the regular performer over the RPM? THanks

HotRod
__________________
1970 Chevy C-20
350 V-8
Turbo 350 w/ shift kit
Dana 60 w/ 4.10 gears AND Powr-Loc POSI
New Additions:
Summit Headers
135amp alternator
Proform HEI
Edelbrock 1406 600cfm carb
Sunpro Tach
Powr-Loc POSI
Edelbrock Performer RPM Intake
MSD 6A Ignition Box

AIM: HotRod929

Visit My Site: http://1970chevy.netfirms.com/
HotRod929 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2002, 02:19 AM   #9
Longhorn Man
its all about the +6 inches
 
Longhorn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
THe RPM is just as good as the lower performer...just made for something differnt.
He is bolting this to a stock, old engine. The RPM is made for higher RPMs and a stock engine may/will run out of breath before the intake is doing much work.
With a stock cam....stick with the performer.
If you have a mild yet hoter cam...step up to the RPM.
You want to match your whole package. If you don't, it'll be a huge disapointment. and that means from carb, all the way to the rear gears...it all has to work together.
Longhorn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2002, 02:22 AM   #10
neonlarry
Registered User
 
neonlarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Vacaville, CA
Posts: 2,746
There is really nothing wrong with the performer RPM stuff. The intake manifold is really good, and I have heard good stuff about the heads too. The performer RPM cam is a bit too big for a heavy truck though. All of that stuff is more suited to a engine with higher compression, better heads, and a higher stall speed (for an automatic)
__________________
70 C/10 Light Red 350/TH350, HEI, Duals w/40 series Flows, 91 seat, LED taillights
99 Pontiac S/C GTP, SLP Ram Air hood, GMPP Konis & springs
95 Neon ACR, MP PCM, AFX UDP, 3.0 CAI
neonlarry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2002, 02:57 AM   #11
BUXMAN66
go bucks!
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: MIAMISBURG OHIO USA
Posts: 803
i agree w/ you guys.got a perfomance power pkg. on my truck and it's great.best for all around driveability.rpm pkg. and you'll need to go to a higher stall converter.rpm cam is a little hotter cam,needs higher rpm's for it's power curve,which doesn't match up well w/ the stock t.c.(900-1100 rpm's).you'll be constantly putting it in neutral at stoplights,etc.......w/your stock config.best bet is the performer power pkg. (cam,lifters,intake,carb.and might as well spring for the double roller timing chain while youre at it,you're right there anyhow.)best of luck!
__________________
'68 swb 1/2t 350/350th
'86 lngbd 3/4 TON parts getter
'49 gmc 1/2 t 5 window 350/350th
'96 gmc sonoma sle ext-cab. hey it's a 4cyl. 5 spd and good on gas y'know?
BUXMAN66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2002, 04:08 AM   #12
COBALT
Senior Member
 
COBALT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Posts: 5,817
Good info here, but I'm really limited in terms of having the truck out of commission for any length of time. What I should really be doing is pulling the 4 bolt main out of my parts truck and tearing that down to the deck, and building with that, but I'm being impatient. I want some performance gains now without having to worry about building another engine. This truck has been out of commission for 3 months, and I have to start using it to work on my house, so anything I do now has to be restricted to weekend stuff only. No "several weeks at dad's in a row" for a while.

Seems like the REAL problem are the heads and cam. Yep, those heads are stock, and they don't allow for much push. The cam is basic run-of-the-mill, and since I don't have much experience with either I'd be fishing in the dark with coming up with a good valvetrain/cam combo. I mean I'd do ok with getting each, but I've heard you can stick yourself with too big of a cam, or heads that provide too much of a charge, etc....

Anyway, the cam/head discussion is really trivial right now anyway, because I simply need the truck now, so I'm back to bolt-ons. I'll check out the other manifold someone mentioned, but my gut is telling me to start basic and save the super fancy options later when I build my small block.

Thanks guys...
__________________
'69 3/4 ton C20 2wd-350ci/TH400
'69 3/4 ton Custom 20 2wd-350ci/4sp Manual
'99 2wd 5.7 Chevy Tahoe
Seattle, WA.
COBALT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2002, 10:09 AM   #13
694X4
Registered User
 
694X4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: utica, oh,
Posts: 249
If you are going to build a motor anyways later I would just do intake, carb. and maybe headers. Remember if you do headers you are going to need to have the exhaust cut and the flange welded on.
__________________
69 3/4 ton 4x4 gmc with 6" sky jacker soft ride. 350 / th350 / 205
work in progress
694X4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2002, 10:58 AM   #14
Randy70C-10
Account Suspended
 
Randy70C-10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Virginia Beach, Va. U.S.A.
Posts: 15,320
Like he said, just bolt on an intake, 4 barrel carb and some headers. It can be done in one day.
Randy70C-10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2002, 11:38 AM   #15
70 longbed
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 490
HEADS. Bolt on, the same time that you do the intake. A set of the vortech heads will make quite a difference. After rebuilding my engine, it was the heads that put me to the 400hp mark.

There is a series of articles in Chevy High Performance magazines to take a 350, and add power with bolt on equipment for performance. Not sure of the issues, but if you are interested, I can look them up for you.

The vortech heads will make a difference in the intake that you buy, or you can modify your intake bolt holes for the different angle.
70 longbed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2002, 11:51 AM   #16
crazy longhorn
Fabricate till you "puke"
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ill
Posts: 9,403
I would go for the bolt ons also, considering that the truck will be used while working on the house. I like the edelbrock stuff, & have the complete RPM package.....but with a comp XE 268 substituted for cam......the rpm pcs are too much for a daily driver/hauler tho. As far as intake, Im not a fan of dual pattern stuff......if you are running a squarebore carb,I feel that its better to have a square bore intake. I think the 600 edelbrock carb would be a nice addition, & agree with neonlarry on the eps manifold. you can always add heads & cam later, or do a complete overhaul & use thepcs you have on any conventional bolt style heads. IMHO, the vortecs work good on mild to medium apps, but arent that cost effective at the higher perf levels due to the extra machinework,springs,special rockers,& intake. At any rate, good luck with your project....crazy AL
__________________
69 longhorn,4" chop,3/5 drop, 1/2 ton suspension/disc brakes,1 1/2" body drop,steel tilt clip, 5.3/Edelbrock rpm intake/600 carb, Hooker streetrod shorties,2 1/2" exhaust/ H pipe/50's Flows , 6 spd Richmond trans,12 bolt/ 3.40 gears....
crazy longhorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2002, 12:39 AM   #17
Longhorn Man
its all about the +6 inches
 
Longhorn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
Remember, if you just do intake carb and exhaust...it will help out quite a bit now....and can be swapped onto the next engine when the time comes.
Longhorn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com