03-16-2018, 07:51 AM | #1 |
Special Order
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,863
|
Suburban Questions
I don't know much about these year trucks since I have yet to own one. I've owned some Suburbans from the '40s, '60s, '70s, and '90s. I drive a '95 now. My sister bought a '99 K2500 Suburban new and still runs it. It's the 3/4t 4wds I especially like and mostly owned. I know the 8-lugs aren't offered any more, but what was the last year? Were manual transmissions offered in these years? I was real disappointed when GM decided to drop the diesel Suburban.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed" GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project) GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling) Tim "Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman" R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~ |
03-16-2018, 08:12 AM | #2 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: .
Posts: 2,179
|
Re: Suburban Questions
Quote:
The 2000-2006 2500 suburbans still had 8 lugs. They kept the 2500 suburban/Yukon XL going to the 2013 model year(and it still had 8 lugs). There weren't any manual transmissions offered in the 2000+. After 2000, the only engines were the 6.0 and the 8.1. the only engine offered after 07 was the 6.0. There is a 3500 suburban offered 2016 to present(and its 8 lug), but they are all goverment orders. I dont think it made much sense to have a diesel suburban to begin with( at least with underpowered diesels). In the GMT400 platform, the diesel had 420 ft/lbs of torque. The 454 had 410. Is that 10 ft/lbs worth the extra maintainence and cost and noise? |
|
03-16-2018, 11:54 AM | #3 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Motor City
Posts: 9,149
|
Re: Suburban Questions
Quote:
One of the motivations for the diesel Suburban (in my mind, anyway) was fuel economy. The 454 would get 8-10 mpg with the engine shut off coasting down a hill. I had a squarebody 2wd diesel Suburban that was probably in the high 20's for fuel use. When equipped with the 40 gallon tank you couldn't time your bathroom breaks with your fuel stops because your bladder would explode first. K
__________________
Chevrolet Flint Assembly 1979-1986 GM Full Size Truck Engineering 1986 - 2019 Intro from an Old Assembly Guy: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=342926 My Pontiac story: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=560524 Chevelle intro: http://www.superchevy.com/features/s...hevy-chevelle/ |
|
03-16-2018, 11:06 PM | #4 |
Special Order
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,863
|
Re: Suburban Questions
Well, first of all, if they had continued the diesel Suburban it would have been a Duramax. But the sense in the 6.2/6.5 diesel Suburbans was having the largest capacity SUV that got better fuel economy than mid-sized and it had 430 ft lb of torque for hauling. The typical situation is either you get good economy or you get a lot of room and with a diesel Suburban you got both. My sister's '99 is the new body style. You could get either that year.
Diesels are lower maintenance and the noise is relative. To me it is a different sound, not louder. They are plenty quiet on the inside.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed" GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project) GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling) Tim "Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman" R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~ Last edited by special-K; 03-16-2018 at 11:15 PM. |
03-17-2018, 04:20 PM | #5 |
driving is in my blood
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mesa AZ
Posts: 5,694
|
Re: Suburban Questions
A duramax suburban would be the bee's knee's man. But I have to admit, the 287k mile 5.3L in my 02 moves it with no problems what so ever, better then the 6.2L in the 2015 denali on my lot currently.
A 1ton dually duramax- that thing would be unstoppable. Ahhh to dream.
__________________
-78 c10 short/step: 388cid, M20, 5/5 drop, lots more. Playtoy and first vehicle. -98 c1500 x-cab: 5.7L, 17" rims, 5/6 drop, flowmaster, helper bags,NBS rear disk brakes. -02 Suburban 4x4: leveled front -CBR600F4i, CBR600RR, CBR1000RR, and standup skis DISCLAIMER: I cant spell for the life of me. |
03-18-2018, 11:04 PM | #6 |
Special Order
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,863
|
Re: Suburban Questions
I agree, the new gas motors came a long way toward closing the dap btween diesels and gas when it comes to longetivity and fuel use.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed" GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project) GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling) Tim "Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman" R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~ |
Bookmarks |
|
|