The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-30-2018, 12:04 AM   #1
clockdoc
Registered User
 
clockdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Glen Allen, VA
Posts: 67
Destroyed Thrust Bearing in Newly Built 327

I am far from a frequent poster but I hope someone can point me in the right direction here. I built a 327 to replace the original 305 in my 1978 Custom Deluxe which had a newly-rebuilt TH350 transmission. I turned the engine, with a new converter (2400 stall) and flexplate, to a local mechanic for installation. An oil leak that developed during the first approximately 2500 miles, finally led to pulling the pan to find that the thrust bearing was badly damaged and that debris from it had reached the rear seal, causing the leak.

The engine is in my garage now and the truck is at the installer's shop waiting for a repaired engine. The crank is ready to be lifted out, but is still in the block. Closer inspection reveals a heavily worn rear thrust bearing flange as well as very heavy damage to the thrust ring on the crank. There is virtually no wear on the forward flange of the bearing. Being that the damaged bearing flange is the rearmost flange (corresponding damage to thrust ring on its forward-facing surface) it appears that something had been pushing hard on the rear of the crank. The installer is sure that the converter was fully engaged with the transmission and that appropriate end play existed in the converter before it was bolted to the flexplate.

My questions to the group are, given all of the above, is there anything related the build that could, if done improperly, could cause the above damage or, is the damage definitely due to externally-applied force? If the crank is being forced forward externally, what would you suspect? I am really concerned about repairing the damage only to have a repeat performance. One final observation; the pilot recess in the rear of the 327 crank is significantly shallower (approx. 3/16) than that on the old 305 crank.

I apologize for the length of this post, but I was trying to provide all of the info that I thought was pertinent. Any input from you folks will be greatly appreciated.

Last edited by clockdoc; 11-30-2018 at 12:09 AM.
clockdoc is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com