Disc Brake Upgrade Reference Thread

[Harley1650]

By the way, the brake booster is 9" but the guy said he could but an 8 or 7 on it. Does size matter??? lol

[Captainfab]

Well that depends on how and where your BB is mounted. I have a BB in my '66 Suburban, and I'm running power brakes, using a '72 Impala booster which is 11 or 12" in diameter. I have no problems at all in removing the valve covers. Of course I moved the engine 2" forward from the original location. But that does not affect the location of the booster in relation to the valve covers.

I replied to your PM regarding the steering box and tie rod question.

Originally Posted by Harley1650

Well, one more time. Been looking at power brakes but I have a big block in the 63' and it doesnt look like I'd be able to get the valve covers off with power brakes. Anyone know?

Edit: Here is a pic of the booster installed on my '66 Suburban.

[Harley1650]

Thanks Lost, I think Captain has me straightened out with that, my mind is working on brake boosters now, hahaha

[SCOTI]

The way I understand it is smaller diameter vac boosters = less overall vacuum accummulation = less overall assist. So, w/a smaller diameter booster, you'd still have more stopping pressure/force available vs other alternatives but it wouldn't be the most. It would prob read something like this.....

*Effective brake pressure/force exerted per ft/lbs of effort applied lowest to highest
Manual drum brakes
Power drum brakes
Manual disc brakes
Power disc w/small single diaphragm booster
Power disc w/small dbl diaphragm booster
Power disc w/Lg. single
Power disc w/Lg. dbl
Hydo-boost

*This is a generalization. Research each option for accurate factual data.

[Harley1650]

Thanks guys. John, I'll be buying yout steering box adapter soon!

[c10hevy]

I put the entire front suspension from the 1991 box body suburban in my 66 GMC with absolutely no problems, literally a bolt in, one afternoon job, but have stumbled upon a question;

I want to keep the six lug pattern so that I dont have to change wheels and the parts from CPP are 6 lug rotors, is that all i need to keep the 6 lug configuration? there arent any hubs or anything like that, like on newer chevys?

[Captainfab]

As long as that '91 Suburban had the 1-1/4" thick rotors, then all you need is the aftermarket rotors, bearings and seals. The hub and rotors are one unit just like the 5x5 rotors.

Originally Posted by c10hevy

I put the entire front suspension from the 1991 box body suburban in my 66 GMC with absolutely no problems, literally a bolt in, one afternoon job, but have stumbled upon a question;

I want to keep the six lug pattern so that I dont have to change wheels and the parts from CPP are 6 lug rotors, is that all i need to keep the 6 lug configuration? there arent any hubs or anything like that, like on newer chevys?

[c10hevy]

Instead of swapping the entire crossmember from the '91 I just took the a-arms, so my question is how do you connect the large diameter soft brake lines from the '91 and connect them to the 1/4 " '66 hard lines. Can I get a union from home depot or someplace similar?

I also have a question about the brake pushrod:
Since the one off the '91 is too short can I fab up an intermediary connector with a hole on each end and bridge the 1" gap? Or will I run into binding?

-Mike
Posted via Mobile Device

[Captainfab]

The front hard lines on your '66 should be 3/16" in diameter. They should thread right into the later model hoses. That is unless for some reason your hoses are metric. Then you would need a SAE to metric adapter.

When extending the booster pushrod, you can not have 2 pivot points. You will need to cut the eye off of the booster pushrod, and either weld that to a section of your original pushrod, or use a piece of tubing to slide over the two. Then either weld, or cross drill and use either roll pins, or small machine screws.

Originally Posted by c10hevy

Instead of swapping the entire crossmember from the '91 I just took the a-arms, so my question is how do you connect the large diameter soft brake lines from the '91 and connect them to the 1/4 " '66 hard lines. Can I get a union from home depot or someplace similar?

I also have a question about the brake pushrod:
Since the one off the '91 is too short can I fab up an intermediary connector with a hole on each end and bridge the 1" gap? Or will I run into binding?

-Mike
Posted via Mobile Device

[LostMy65]

Originally Posted by c10hevy

....clip.....how do you connect the large diameter soft brake lines from the '91 and connect them to the 1/4 " '66 hard lines. Can I get a union from home depot or someplace similar?

-Mike
Posted via Mobile Device

The outer diameter of the hose connection appears larger, but that's for connecting to the frame.
It's also threaded on the inside.
That's where you connect your hard brake line.


Posted via Mobile Device

[porter90]

i have a question that i havent seen yet. i have a 64 gmc and i found a 67-72 chev at a junk yard with 5 lugs and discs should the spindles bolt right up or would i need to change control arms out. any help would be awesome

[old_1966_GMC]

Wats up been a while but heres my problem changed my front end on my 65 gmc to a 73 c10 five lugs im tryin to figure out if i can use standard grade 8 bolts on the upper control arm where the shims rest on beside puttin those standard stud bolts Back in
Posted via Mobile Device

[Captainfab]

If you don't use the original style studs, you would have to stitch weld the grade 8 bolts, so they don't spin. If it were mine, I would check into getting replacement OEM style studs.

Originally Posted by old_1966_GMC

Wats up been a while but heres my problem changed my front end on my 65 gmc to a 73 c10 five lugs im tryin to figure out if i can use standard grade 8 bolts on the upper control arm where the shims rest on beside puttin those standard stud bolts Back in
Posted via Mobile Device

[Captainfab]

Yes the '71-'72 spindles will bolt up to your original control arms,as long as you install the '71-'72 ball joints. If you want to get the '71-'72 control arms along with the spindles, they will bolt up to your '64 GMC crossmember

Originally Posted by porter90

i have a question that i havent seen yet. i have a 64 gmc and i found a 67-72 chev at a junk yard with 5 lugs and discs should the spindles bolt right up or would i need to change control arms out. any help would be awesome

[porter90]

awesome! i think thats what ill do, shouldnt be too much. thanks captainfab.
Posted via Mobile Device

[terrylgreenjr]

My question isn't as involved as the others. I have a 77 2wd Blazer not sure which rotors I have. If I find that i have the 1" what will it take to upgrade to the 1.25" I assume its a little upgrade. Where do you measure to see which ones you have.

Thanks

[Rich 5150 69]

All depends on the calipers, are you using the calipers from the same donor vehicle..?

[terrylgreenjr]

I'm not sure whats on my blazer, but if I want 1.25" rotors Will I need 1.25" calipers also? I there anything else besides rotors and calipers that are different?

[Captainfab]

The spindle is also different for the 1.25" rotors versus the 1" thick rotors.

[65Custom]

I have read through this whole thread and for what ever reason some where on this site in the past ( not this thread ) I thought that I had read that doing a cross member swap moved the front wheels forward about an inch or so when using a later cross member

now based on what I have read here that may not be the case but can someone clarify?

[Captainfab]

I'm not aware of any wheelbase changes resulting from the crossmember swap. But then again, I have not checked either. Just the change to discs, does increase the track width a bit though.

Originally Posted by 65Custom

I have read through this whole thread and for what ever reason some where on this site in the past ( not this thread ) I thought that I had read that doing a cross member swap moved the front wheels forward about an inch or so when using a later cross member

now based on what I have read here that may not be the case but can someone clarify?

[65Custom]

Originally Posted by Captainfab

I'm not aware of any wheelbase changes resulting from the crossmember swap. But then again, I have not checked either. Just the change to discs, does increase the track width a bit though.

Thanks for info, it makes sense

[55dude]

great thread and very complete! let me ask about the rearend does anyone have any pic's of the 73-87 rearend into the 65' C10? thanks!

[65ChevyC20]

What a wealth of information, thanks for putting it all together in one place to read through.
I have a scenario I would like some input on.

As you can see from my screen name I have on of these. I want to to the front disk upgrade and have read through all the posts, WOW.

Driving by a wrecking yard today I noticed a 79 C20 being loaded onto the back of a flatbed. I flipped a u turn and inquired about the truck. The truck was stripped except for the front crossmember and all the suspension and brakes, a complete front end. I asked the guy if I could buy it and he said 50 bucks. I jumped on it as my time and effort of tracking down all the parts or pulling them off a truck in a pick and pull yard is not what I consider a good time.

He brought out a cutting torch and just cut off the frame rails of the 79 C20 and loaded it in my truck. He cut the hard lines to the brakes but I am sure I will have to create my own there.

My question is should I do the complete crossmember swap or should I swap the various pieces over to the crossmember on my 65. Which would be easier is what I am asking.

Thanks for all the info that this site provides!

[Captainfab]

Well from a easier perspective, just switching the ball joints, spindles, rotors, calipers, etc. would be the easiest. The '79 lower control arms will not bolt up to your '65's crossmember, since there are no saddles there.. If your '65 has the engine in it, switching the crossmember can be done, but it is a bit more of a challenge. If the engine is out, it's a piece of cake. Did you get the steering box with the front suspension?