The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-17-2017, 01:18 AM   #1
SPUdMurphy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: New West, BC, Canada
Posts: 47
Cam suggestion

Hey guys,

Im sure this has been covered many times, but I searched and couldn't really find what I was hoping to find.

I am rebuilding the motor in my truck as whoever rebuilt it last did not torque down one of the rod caps properly, so it started to back off. Thankfully I didnt spin a bearing, but I had to have the crank machined.

Anyway, here is my motor specs, and I need a suggestion for what cam to go with:

- 355 with cast flat top pistons
- Edelbrock performer air gap intake
- Edelbrock 650cfm carb
- Stock cast heads

The motor had a crane energizer cam in it previously (which is worn to the point of needing to be replaced), and the stock heads couldnt take it, and so now im buying some other stock heads as I can't afford to get into Alloy heads right now, and I just want the truck back on the road.

Any suggestions for the best cam to run to get the best increase in low end torque without causing damage to the stock top end?

CHeers,

Ryan
SPUdMurphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2017, 07:11 AM   #2
custom10nut
Registered User
 
custom10nut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: East Tn (In the heart of the Smoky Mtns)
Posts: 1,846
Re: Cam suggestion

Are you going to run an auto trans? If yes, then the Crane Energizer 268 is about a big as you can go on a stock torque converter. Any bigger and it won't idle right, hurting both performance and economy around town. Have an engine machine shop "pin" your rocker studs and you'll have no problems. "Big and Lopy" sound cool, but they take away any hope of economy, and require more maintenance to keep things tight and running smooth. Hope this helps
custom10nut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2017, 08:28 AM   #3
BIG ORANGE
Senior Member
 
BIG ORANGE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lancaster S.C.
Posts: 4,742
Re: Cam suggestion

Not sure if yr going this direction but I bought a new Comp Cam and lifters from Summit Racing and a matching stall convertor 2600) fits a 350 Turbo trans. Ran it less then 500 miles and then changed to a different cam and transmission 700R4
I would be willing to sale the matched cam,lifters and Stall for $250.00 plus shipping. I can get you the cam spec when I get home from work.
Donnie
__________________

Things happen for a reason!
BIG ORANGE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2017, 09:04 AM   #4
geezer#99
Registered User
 
geezer#99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bowser
Posts: 13,512
Re: Cam suggestion

Quote:
Originally Posted by SPUdMurphy View Post
Hey guys,

Im sure this has been covered many times, but I searched and couldn't really find what I was hoping to find.

I am rebuilding the motor in my truck as whoever rebuilt it last did not torque down one of the rod caps properly, so it started to back off. Thankfully I didnt spin a bearing, but I had to have the crank machined.

Anyway, here is my motor specs, and I need a suggestion for what cam to go with:

- 355 with cast flat top pistons
- Edelbrock performer air gap intake
- Edelbrock 650cfm carb
- Stock cast heads

The motor had a crane energizer cam in it previously (which is worn to the point of needing to be replaced), and the stock heads couldnt take it, and so now im buying some other stock heads as I can't afford to get into Alloy heads right now, and I just want the truck back on the road.

Any suggestions for the best cam to run to get the best increase in low end torque without causing damage to the stock top end?

CHeers,

Ryan
A few things to consider.
If the cam was worn (wiped a lobe)to the point of needing replaced I hope you hot tanked the motor to clean it thoroughly. Otherwise you're taking a chance you won't spin some bearings.

If you plan on running your truck anytime below 10 C (50F) then get a different intake. Those unheated air gaps are a pain.

What's wrong with the stock heads?

With your lack of compression (likely near 8.5 to 1) a bone stock cam is what you need. ONe that is no more than 200 degrees at .050.
Check this info.
http://www.crankshaftcoalition.com/w..._compatibility
geezer#99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2017, 09:15 AM   #5
custom10nut
Registered User
 
custom10nut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: East Tn (In the heart of the Smoky Mtns)
Posts: 1,846
Re: Cam suggestion

Geezer, that is a GREAT link.
custom10nut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2017, 09:15 AM   #6
mikecaddy500
Registered User
 
mikecaddy500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: howard city mi
Posts: 83
Re: Cam suggestion

Comp cams 260h is a nice cam pretty close to stock with a little more torque.
mikecaddy500 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2017, 11:14 AM   #7
SPUdMurphy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: New West, BC, Canada
Posts: 47
Re: Cam suggestion

Quote:
Originally Posted by geezer#99 View Post
A few things to consider.
If the cam was worn (wiped a lobe)to the point of needing replaced I hope you hot tanked the motor to clean it thoroughly. Otherwise you're taking a chance you won't spin some bearings.

If you plan on running your truck anytime below 10 C (50F) then get a different intake. Those unheated air gaps are a pain.

What's wrong with the stock heads?

With your lack of compression (likely near 8.5 to 1) a bone stock cam is what you need. ONe that is no more than 200 degrees at .050.
Check this info.
http://www.crankshaftcoalition.com/w..._compatibility
Cheers mate.

The lobes didn't get wiped out, they are just showing signs of wear, and so are the lifters. I can take pictures and post if it helps. I was just told that they should probably be replaced whilst we're in there.

Apparently the cam was too big for the springs based on the machine shops measurements. 11 of 16 valves were worn and the guides are hard and also need replacing.

I don't care about it being lopey, I just want more low end torque.
SPUdMurphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2017, 07:01 AM   #8
randy.powell
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Bushwood, MD
Posts: 510
Re: Cam suggestion

So if you're looking for low end torque look at Howard's Roller Cams also. My Motor has roller everything in the valve train, flat top pistons, Edelbrock performer intake and 1406 carb. Double hump big valve heads. Original block (.030 bore). With that setup on the dyno she. Put out 377 horses @ 5100 rpm and 398 ft pds of torque @ 3600 rpm. I'll get my cam seet later and post the model number when I get out to the shop later today. I'm running a BTO stage 2 700 r4 with 1800 stall converter. That girl surprises alot of people and very streetable. I'll post the cam # later.
Randy
randy.powell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2017, 08:53 AM   #9
Mike C
Registered User
 
Mike C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Austin, TX, USA
Posts: 7,709
Re: Cam suggestion

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikecaddy500 View Post
Comp cams 260h is a nice cam pretty close to stock with a little more torque.
This is a great cam for a street vehicle. It compares to the Crane 266 which I have run with great success. Especially in an SM465 equipped vehicle. They both are 210 degrees duration at .050 lift.

If you have an auto trans stay below 220 degrees duration at .050 and if you have a manual, stay below 215 degrees and you should be good to go.
__________________
44 Willys MB
52 M38A1
64 Corvette Coupe
68 Camaro 'vert LT1 & TH700
69 Z/28 355 12.6's @110
69 Chevy Short Step 4 1/2"/7" drop
72 Jimmy 4WD 4spd 4" & 35's
02 GMC 2500HD 4x4 Duramax
Mike C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2017, 11:53 PM   #10
SPUdMurphy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: New West, BC, Canada
Posts: 47
Re: Cam suggestion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike C View Post
This is a great cam for a street vehicle. It compares to the Crane 266 which I have run with great success. Especially in an SM465 equipped vehicle. They both are 210 degrees duration at .050 lift.

If you have an auto trans stay below 220 degrees duration at .050 and if you have a manual, stay below 215 degrees and you should be good to go.
Thanks mate, I appreciate the reply.

I will look into the specs you specify.

Cheers,

Ryan
SPUdMurphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com