The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1947 - 1959 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-20-2017, 04:02 AM   #1
Jesse Z
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 290
Firewall Bracing For MC?

I see many of you use firewall mounted master cylinders. And suggestions regarding how should I brace the firewall and mount the MC to prevent flexing during brake application?
Jesse Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2017, 08:38 AM   #2
bowt1ed
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 494
Re: Firewall Bracing For MC?

A few of us have used CPP's booster/master mount kit, which triangulates the firewall and dash. Very strong. Prior to that, I had a 2nd Gen Camaro booster/master and it was supported adequately. If I were staying with it still, would probably fab another support bracket to dash though.

Cheers, Jim
bowt1ed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2017, 08:35 PM   #3
Oldtruckwelder
Registered User
 
Oldtruckwelder's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Jackson SC
Posts: 103
Re: Firewall Bracing For MC?

The cpp system is really nice and braced
JT from SC
Attached Images
  
Oldtruckwelder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2017, 10:56 PM   #4
mr48chev
Registered User
 
mr48chev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toppenish, WA
Posts: 15,268
Re: Firewall Bracing For MC?

I used a piece of plate about a foot square on the inside of the firewall on mine when I had the firewall mounted mc. Had the pedal bracket tied into the dash too. Never had a flex problem. I had a mastercylinder/booster and pedal assembly out of some rig I scrapped out but can't remember what. I just remember the booster was big and ugly but worked great.
__________________
Founding member of the too many projects, too little time and money club.

My ongoing truck projects:
48 Chev 3100 that will run a 292 Six.
71 GMC 2500 that is getting a Cad 500 transplant.
77 C 30 dualie, 454, 4 speed with a 10 foot flatbed and hoist. It does the heavy work and hauls the projects around.
mr48chev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2017, 05:21 AM   #5
Jesse Z
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 290
Re: Firewall Bracing For MC?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldtruckwelder View Post
The cpp system is really nice and braced
JT from SC
That looks like a problem solver that will get my truck on the road quicker. Thanks!
Jesse Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2017, 08:49 AM   #6
Oldtruckwelder
Registered User
 
Oldtruckwelder's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Jackson SC
Posts: 103
Re: Firewall Bracing For MC?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse Z View Post
That looks like a problem solver that will get my truck on the road quicker. Thanks!
The CPP system is top notch and has some options at order.
Some of the cons are the existing brace/bracket needs to be cut out under dash. And really minor you will need to add your brake light switch of your choice.
JT from SC
Attached Images
 
Oldtruckwelder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2017, 12:22 PM   #7
whitedog76
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 1,450
Re: Firewall Bracing For MC?

I’ve pulled brake pedal assemblies from 03 and newer GM vans and pedal assemblies from Jeep TJ’s. The Jeep was spread out a little more probably not needing firewall reinforcing, but the bracket itself seems a little weak. The GM van pedal is about as beefy as it gets, bolt it up and go.
whitedog76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2017, 04:41 AM   #8
Jesse Z
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 290
Re: Firewall Bracing For MC?

Quote:
Originally Posted by whitedog76 View Post
I’ve pulled brake pedal assemblies from 03 and newer GM vans and pedal assemblies from Jeep TJ’s. The Jeep was spread out a little more probably not needing firewall reinforcing, but the bracket itself seems a little weak. The GM van pedal is about as beefy as it gets, bolt it up and go.
Thanks, now I know where to start looking!
Jesse Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2017, 09:09 AM   #9
roger55
Registered User
 
roger55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: San Angelo, Tx
Posts: 1,068
Re: Firewall Bracing For MC?

I used the one from CPP.
I'd without a doubt buy it again but I did do some modifications to it to make it a lot better.
There are issues that need addressing if you want to be really happy with it.

All the details are in my build thread.
See posts #242, #279 and #416.

Looks like oldtruckwelder and I both decided to weld the plate to the firewall to make it stronger and look better too. I welded spacers under the plate for more support first. I'd guess he did the same thing.

It also looks like he mounted a brake light switch very similar to how I did mine.



Btw, here's the entire kit as received:



I also found a major flaw in the instructions that would have lead to a dangerous situation If I hadn't noticed it:

The instructions state to drill out the 3 rivet holes (used by the OEM to hold them to the drum) to 3/8". This is too small. Their machining isn't accurate enough and a little extra space is needed around the bolts. I went to 13/32" for them. Plus, those same holes need to be chamfered so the 3 bolts (with the tapered heads) they supply will seat properly and pull their plate tight to the hub. I chamfered the holes with a 1/2" drill bit.
I first did it their way and the plate would not pull tight with the hub. If left that way, the assembly would not be in single shear and could lead to failure of the lugs and wheel loss.
Check this with your kit if you buy it. I talked to another person who bought the same kit, and they didn't have this issue.

Here's the hub after I chamfered the the holes. Also look closely in the upper right of the photo where you can see shoulders of bolts protruding through the holes in the plates. Without the chamfer, these would hit the hub and not allow the plate to cinch up to the hub all way. This would be super dangerous and cause failure to the lugs and a possible wheel loss while driving.



As I said before, I also drilled the holes with a 13/32" bit. There was some binding with them being 3/8" but seemed fine with the slightly bigger hole.


Last edited by roger55; 10-23-2017 at 09:51 AM.
roger55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com