The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-27-2003, 01:57 AM   #1
Dropped67step
Gearhead since birth
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ft. Worth TX.
Posts: 190
Cool pics of rear bags

I was wanting to know if any of you guys could post some pics of your rear bags and how you mounted them and were you mounted them. I talked to a guy at a shop and he told me not to put them were my coilsprings went but to use some brackets and mount them off to the side of the frame that it would give me more drop if I did it that way. I have all my bags and comp. and the rest of the kit alrerady exept some rear brackets so any help and pics would be a great help thanks. B.
Dropped67step is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2003, 02:49 PM   #2
NSANE68!!!
SLICER AND DICIER
 
NSANE68!!!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Quuen Creek
Posts: 1,383
Well he is half right. But it all depends on how big your C-notch is.
If you use the standard 2" c-notch, then you can mount them in stock location and get full drop.
If you built your own super C, then you could move them forward, or build a bridge and put them on top of the axle's.
The only thing you would gain by moving them forward on the trailing arms is you would get more LIFT. Hope this helps.
__________________
01 Tahoe 22's 2/4 drop and tv's
68 chevy money pit
51 chevy belair
95 Honda 900RR
05 GMC Siearra (company truck)
NSANE68!!! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2003, 06:29 PM   #3
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,915
I've got the 'bolt-in' c-section from C.C.P. & 2600# bags in the stock location on my 68 w/1.5" blocks also. The limiting factor on mine is the bed floor since the pumpkin hits before the rear bottoms out on the c-section. So, if you plan on stepping or raising your floor, then you might consider alternate mounting locations-- otherwise, the stock location works fine. Sorry, no digi-cam.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2003, 01:03 AM   #4
Dropped67step
Gearhead since birth
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ft. Worth TX.
Posts: 190
Thanks guys for the info i went back by this guys shop today and he said if he built bag mounts and mounted them on the side of the arms and up higher on the arms it would give me 3-3.5 inches more of drop becouse it would let the arm go up that much higher when it comes down becouse the bag is not there in the way on the arm. Well i think for now they are going to go in the same place as the coils did I am not ready to cut the bed yet but in the future I will I just want to get them on and see how I like the ride, Then I will make up my mind on laying frame or not. Thanks again for your help and if anybody has some pic i would like to see them.
Dropped67step is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2003, 09:06 AM   #5
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,915
You can do this & see for yourself....pull the springs out & put a 4x4 block of wood in their place. Most 4x's are not exactly 4" but this gives you an approximate height of the bags @ the lowest psi recommended. I've been driving mine all over DFW this low(usually about 25-30psi + I've got 1.5" blocks as well) for almost 3yrs now w/o probs (except for hammering what's left of the bed). IMO, no need to spend extra if it's not needed.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2003, 03:12 PM   #6
Slammed67
Progress = 0%
 
Slammed67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 2,108
It all depends on the depth of your c-notch (if you have one). Take the coil springs out of the rear and let the frame/c-notch sit on the axle. (Just be careful because your differential may hit the bed floor first.) Then see how much room you have between the top of the trailing arm and the bottom of the frame. I think the max compressed height of most bags is 3", so if it's 3" or more between the arm and frame, the there is no need to make a bracket to mount the bags off to the side. A bag mount isn't going to determine the amount of drop...... it's the max travel (upwards) of the axle/trailing arms.
__________________
Jason - '67 GMC swb | '57 Bel-Air 4dr hardtop | '56 210 4dr Wagon | 2000 GMC Sierra
Slammed67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2003, 02:44 PM   #7
NSANE68!!!
SLICER AND DICIER
 
NSANE68!!!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Quuen Creek
Posts: 1,383
Like I said before you need a HUGE c-notch to lay frame on these trucks. Maybe he doesn't understand these trucks.

I am attaching a pic of my 72, the first one of this era that I bagged.
The frame is roughly 5-6" wide, I cut the frame section out moved the bottom to the top of the frame BOXED, welded, and bridged.
This truck would NOT LAY FRAME, it was short by maybe 1.5"
SO, you would need a notch about 7", by my calculations to lay frame. This was all on 28" tires.
Attached Images
 
__________________
01 Tahoe 22's 2/4 drop and tv's
68 chevy money pit
51 chevy belair
95 Honda 900RR
05 GMC Siearra (company truck)
NSANE68!!! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2003, 02:45 PM   #8
NSANE68!!!
SLICER AND DICIER
 
NSANE68!!!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Quuen Creek
Posts: 1,383
and another of the bridge complete
Attached Images
 
__________________
01 Tahoe 22's 2/4 drop and tv's
68 chevy money pit
51 chevy belair
95 Honda 900RR
05 GMC Siearra (company truck)
NSANE68!!! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2003, 02:46 PM   #9
NSANE68!!!
SLICER AND DICIER
 
NSANE68!!!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Quuen Creek
Posts: 1,383
And one of how the truck sits
Attached Images
 
__________________
01 Tahoe 22's 2/4 drop and tv's
68 chevy money pit
51 chevy belair
95 Honda 900RR
05 GMC Siearra (company truck)
NSANE68!!! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2003, 01:25 AM   #10
Dropped67step
Gearhead since birth
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ft. Worth TX.
Posts: 190
I dont know if the guy knows what he is talking about or not but I had my dad make me some 8 inch c-notchs the other day so I guess I am going to cut the bed was trying to make up my mind on that and finally did My dad owns a metal fab. shop so we are going to do all the work up there That guy wanted 3800.00 to build to bag the rear and that was with me suppling the bags lines and valves all he had to do was notch it and build the bridge and install the bags i thought that was a little to high for my blood and wallet . But thank you for posting some pics It was very helpfull. B.
Dropped67step is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2003, 04:18 AM   #11
low 84
Registered User
 
low 84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,144
Quote:
Originally posted by Dropped67step
I dont know if the guy knows what he is talking about or not but I had my dad make me some 8 inch c-notchs the other day so I guess I am going to cut the bed was trying to make up my mind on that and finally did My dad owns a metal fab. shop so we are going to do all the work up there That guy wanted 3800.00 to build to bag the rear and that was with me suppling the bags lines and valves all he had to do was notch it and build the bridge and install the bags i thought that was a little to high for my blood and wallet . But thank you for posting some pics It was very helpfull. B.
thats more than a 'little' too high. thats WAY too high. i would steer clear of that guy for sure.
__________________
'51 F100, backhalf with a narrowed 9 and coil overs, 18.5" mickeys, monte front clip, +400" sbc in the works

'05 1500 Crew Cab

RIP
'84 swb 5/7 drop, solid cammed 408 w/ fully ported dart heads, th350 w/ 10 inch hughes, 12 bolt w/ 3.73 richmonds and a locker
'80 swb 4x4 in progress: 7" lift, 350 th350/np205, d44 and 1.5" ORD tie rod, 14BFF w/discs , armored diff covers, 40" MTR's
low 84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2003, 02:11 AM   #12
JHickson6
I Love This Stuff!
 
JHickson6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 739
The more pics the better! TTT
__________________

My Rides
1967 C10 In Pieces for now
1985 Ford B700 SourPuss Bus - BIG BLUE
2003 Silverado CITY WORKER YELLOW!!
JHickson6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2003, 03:17 PM   #13
Slammed67
Progress = 0%
 
Slammed67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 2,108
The max compressed height of these Firestones is 3". The recommended ride height (according to Air Ride Technologies) is 5"- 6". Max extended height is 7"



__________________
Jason - '67 GMC swb | '57 Bel-Air 4dr hardtop | '56 210 4dr Wagon | 2000 GMC Sierra

Last edited by Slammed67; 02-17-2003 at 03:19 PM.
Slammed67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com