The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-17-2018, 09:41 PM   #1
reb162
Registered User
 
reb162's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Beavercreek, OH
Posts: 81
Conversion to 88-95 serpentine question

So, in preparation for my crate engine, I made the decision to go with an 88-95 Chevrolet truck serpentine system rather than the original multiple belt setup.

I got the brackets and mounting bolts off ebay for a 1995 Chevrolet C1500. It came with no tensioner or idler pulley so I purchased those for a 1995 c1500.

ACDelco 38108 Professional Automatic Belt Tensioner and Pulley Assembly

ACDelco 15-4957 GM Original Equipment Drive Belt Idler Pulley

On the bracket with the belt tensioner (P/N 10118751) the idler pullet fits fine, but the belt tensioner appears to have an issue. The bolt hole in the tensioner appears to be too large. The bolt measures as a 12mm 1.75 thread bolt and threads into the bracket just fine. However, the bolt is very loose in the tensioner, more than I'm comfortable with. Anyone else have this issue. Was there originally a sleeve in the tensioner?

The bolt mics at 10.79mm at the shank where the tensioner would mount. The hole in the tensioner mics at 14.21mm

Any ideas? Do I have a mismatch in parts somehow (all part numbers check out good for 1995 c1500 by my checks). Am I missing a sleeve?

Appreciate any help.
Attached Images
   
__________________
1971 Chevy C-10
Currently is rust repair
reb162 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2018, 10:23 PM   #2
Warrens69GMC
Registered User
 
Warrens69GMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Safford,AZ
Posts: 3,613
Re: Conversion to 88-95 serpentine question

You need an adapter
Attached Images
 
Warrens69GMC is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2018, 11:35 PM   #3
B. W.
Registered User
 
B. W.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Bigfork, Montana
Posts: 1,137
Re: Conversion to 88-95 serpentine question

There should have been a sleeve in the box. Not all tensioners use the sleeve. (different manufacturers) FWIW, I'm using a '94 serp setup & using the tensioner in the pic. It doesn't really matter but I like the looks of the OE tensioner better.
Attached Images
 
B. W. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2018, 08:21 AM   #4
reb162
Registered User
 
reb162's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Beavercreek, OH
Posts: 81
Re: Conversion to 88-95 serpentine question

I figured there had to be a sleeve, and of course there was none in my box. I also bought oem. Out of curiosity, what part number did you buy? I guess I need to return mine and get one with a sleeve or try to find a sleeve.
Bob
__________________
1971 Chevy C-10
Currently is rust repair
reb162 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2018, 11:18 AM   #5
B. W.
Registered User
 
B. W.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Bigfork, Montana
Posts: 1,137
Re: Conversion to 88-95 serpentine question

OK, I just pulled an old tensioner out of my junk pile, it's an original GM tensioner that I replaced a couple of weeks ago. It measures the same as yours & it had no sleeve. I think you fine running it without a sleeve. The pin on the back locates it, all the bolt does is provide clamping force. (A little slop never hurt any one - - loose is fast!)
B. W. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2018, 12:31 PM   #6
Artofdeath
Registered User
 
Artofdeath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Sandusky, Ohio USA
Posts: 104
Re: Conversion to 88-95 serpentine question

Quote:
Originally Posted by B. W. View Post
OK, I just pulled an old tensioner out of my junk pile, it's an original GM tensioner that I replaced a couple of weeks ago. It measures the same as yours & it had no sleeve. I think you fine running it without a sleeve. The pin on the back locates it, all the bolt does is provide clamping force. (A little slop never hurt any one - - loose is fast!)
Ha, spoken like a drag racer!
Artofdeath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2018, 01:05 PM   #7
Bigdav160
Registered User
 
Bigdav160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Klein Texas
Posts: 3,852
Re: Conversion to 88-95 serpentine question

I thought the bolt had a shoulder, under the head, to keep it centered.
__________________
My Classics:
'72 K20 Suburban + '65 Dodge Town Wagon
'72 Corvette Roadster +'67 Corvette Roadster
'73 Z-28 Camaro
'63 Ford SWB Uni Pickup
'50 Ford Coupe
Bigdav160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2018, 06:22 PM   #8
reb162
Registered User
 
reb162's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Beavercreek, OH
Posts: 81
Re: Conversion to 88-95 serpentine question

The bolt does have a larger shoulder, but I believe the top area of the tensioner where the bolt goes in is also wider. I'll mic the bolt and top of the bolt holes tonight and post pics and measurements. I tend to agree that maybe there was just meant to be slop. The locator pin really helps to center the tensioner a bit, and then the bolt just is a tension bolt to hold it on.
__________________
1971 Chevy C-10
Currently is rust repair
reb162 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com