The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-16-2017, 11:58 PM   #1
Greasey Harley
Registered User
 
Greasey Harley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Post Falls, ID
Posts: 884
modest drop 2 or 3 inches. need input

I recently rebuilt the front end on my '68 C10 2wd. BJ's and tie rods. and a set of 1" drop springs.
I'm trying to decide weather to lower the rear of the truck 2" or 3".
I will be doing a static drip with just springs and shocks.

I Know that I would prefer the look of -3" springs but hesitate because I sometimes haul motorcycles in the back, either 1 Harley, or 2 dirt bikes
Has anyone tried to haul a large motorcycle with 3" drop springs? I would like some first hand information on this.
I realize I could do 2" springs then add a 1" block later, if I wanted it lower, but I'd rather just use springs and do it once


thanks, -R
Greasey Harley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2017, 08:01 AM   #2
JMC1965
Registered User
 
JMC1965's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 119
Re: modest drop 2 or 3 inches. need input

Same concern about the drop and payload issue.

I did a search on the board and there are a few examples of "helper bags" to solve that problem.

Here's one of them...

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=425850


I'll be doing helper bags
__________________
JMC1965
1967 C20 LWB
  • 350 (ATK-HP32) / FiTech EFI
  • 4L60e / 4 wheel disc brakes
  • 20" American Racing VN327 & 245/50/20 Michelin
JMC1965 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2017, 08:08 AM   #3
JMC1965
Registered User
 
JMC1965's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 119
Re: modest drop 2 or 3 inches. need input

Same concern about the drop and payload issue.

I did a search on the board and there are a few examples of I'm adding "helper bags" to solve that problem.

Here's one of them...

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=425850
__________________
JMC1965
1967 C20 LWB
  • 350 (ATK-HP32) / FiTech EFI
  • 4L60e / 4 wheel disc brakes
  • 20" American Racing VN327 & 245/50/20 Michelin
JMC1965 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2017, 02:40 PM   #4
ShortCST
Registered User
 
ShortCST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 170
Re: modest drop 2 or 3 inches. need input

I just finished a 1.875" front, 3" rear drop.

1" in the front and 3" in the rear would make your truck level, almost lower at the rear. And you'll definitely need new rear shocks.

I elected to keep a just barely noticeable rake by only lowering the rear 1" lower than the front. Just barely.

If you use 2" springs in the rear, you probably won't need to change your shocks, and your truck will likely be level with a bike in the back.

Here's a photo of my pickup with a 2" front/rear drop. Ended up with 3" rear springs after this, for better handling. As I wrote above, kept the slightest rake.
Attached Images
 

Last edited by ShortCST; 08-18-2017 at 03:04 AM. Reason: Typo
ShortCST is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2017, 06:48 PM   #5
OARNGESI
Registered User
 
OARNGESI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: CASA GRANDE AZ
Posts: 4,276
Re: modest drop 2 or 3 inches. need input

Use drop blocks instead of springs then your spring rate and all will be the same
__________________
70 SWB STEPSIDE
70 BLAZER
09 challenger
OARNGESI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2017, 07:10 PM   #6
ShortCST
Registered User
 
ShortCST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 170
Re: modest drop 2 or 3 inches. need input

FWIW, some suppliers (like CPP) advise against 2" drop blocks with 15" wheels, because it brings the u-bolts on your trailing arms so close to the road. I tried 2" blocks first, before I read the warnings, and saw that the trailing arms were too close to the pavement for my comfort. 3" blocks would be crazy.
ShortCST is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2017, 09:01 PM   #7
96blazr
Registered User
 
96blazr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: VA
Posts: 740
Re: modest drop 2 or 3 inches. need input

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greasey Harley View Post
I recently rebuilt the front end on my '68 C10 2wd. BJ's and tie rods. and a set of 1" drop springs.
I'm trying to decide weather to lower the rear of the truck 2" or 3".
I will be doing a static drip with just springs and shocks.

thanks, -R
I dropped mine 2-inches on all 4 corners using Early Classic Enterprises 2" Springs and Gas Shocks. Made a real difference too. Still looks like a truck (instead of a squashed bug) and handles a little better.
If you plan on going any lower, you'll need to get the wallet out.
Attached Images
  
__________________
1968 SWB.
GMPP 350/350 Turbo Trans, Edelbrock Performer & Carb. Hedman Hedders, Hooker Aerochambers Mufflers. Tuff Stuff Alternators.

Remember, no matter where you go,
There you are.

Gary
96blazr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2017, 03:49 PM   #8
Greasey Harley
Registered User
 
Greasey Harley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Post Falls, ID
Posts: 884
Re: modest drop 2 or 3 inches. need input

Thanks for all the input. I decided to go with the 2" drop springs in the back. Ultimately, it needs to function as a truck and looks are secondary.
Greasey Harley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2017, 04:01 AM   #9
ShortCST
Registered User
 
ShortCST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 170
Re: modest drop 2 or 3 inches. need input

Good choice. Post a photo!
ShortCST is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2017, 07:41 AM   #10
panhead59
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Vinton, Va.
Posts: 473
Re: modest drop 2 or 3 inches. need input

Coil over rear shocks add about 500 lbs. to tongue wt. if hauling a trailer. Or so the specs say. So I'm guessing they would really help in your situation. Inexpensive also.
panhead59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2017, 09:15 AM   #11
Greasey Harley
Registered User
 
Greasey Harley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Post Falls, ID
Posts: 884
Re: modest drop 2 or 3 inches. need input

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShortCST View Post
Good choice. Post a photo!
RIGHT!

Last edited by Greasey Harley; 08-21-2017 at 07:04 PM.
Greasey Harley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2017, 06:11 PM   #12
54belair
Registered User
 
54belair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: bolivar, mo
Posts: 839
Re: modest drop 2 or 3 inches. need input

I'm just finishing up on a 68 short stepside (don't really have any side shots yet on level pavement), I dropped the front 1.5" with spindles and stock springs then the back is a 3" drop with springs. With same size tires all way round, I have just under a 1" rake on it. The 1.5 in the front is all I would want on a driver (just my opinion).
__________________
1997 shortie stepside
1968 short stepside
1966 mustang
1966 chevelle ss

Dont always go the cheapest route--You can save yourself into the poorhouse!
My Build Thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=489030
54belair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2017, 10:51 PM   #13
ShortCST
Registered User
 
ShortCST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 170
Re: modest drop 2 or 3 inches. need input

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greasey Harley View Post
RIGHT!
Perfect!
ShortCST is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com