The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-19-2003, 10:26 AM   #26
kxmotox247
Senior Member
 
kxmotox247's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 1,396
Quote:
Originally posted by loweredd

Stock floor body drop is just as easy as doing air suspension on these trucks if you are interested in being THAT low.

What does that mean? Instead of air ride, channeling the body over the frame?

If I need to weld on new brackets on the rear end, would I be getting rid of my trailing arms? What would I do? Shave all of the old mounts off my rear end and weld on new ones? The 4-link would replace the trailing arms and the new brackets would be for the bags? Is this at the point when someone might decide to switch to a 9"?

I don't want to steal anyone's thread here....
Does anyone have any other pictures of a bare frame with air ride installed?

Thanks for everyone's help.
kxmotox247 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2003, 10:30 AM   #27
Slammed67
Progress = 0%
 
Slammed67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 2,108
Check out my web site. It shows pics of my air ride system. A 9" has nothing to do with air suspension, it's just a personal preference. You don't need a 4-link either.

jayspot.com
__________________
Jason - '67 GMC swb | '57 Bel-Air 4dr hardtop | '56 210 4dr Wagon | 2000 GMC Sierra
Slammed67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2003, 10:58 AM   #28
loweredd
www.loweredd.com
 
loweredd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Struble IA
Posts: 808
I wondered about the 9" part of your post too. Stock floor body drop is a little bit different than channeling. With a stock floor body drop, you remove the offending (lowest part of the frame) piece of frame, to make it even with the rocker panels. Then it lays on the body, not the frame.
loweredd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2003, 10:59 AM   #29
loweredd
www.loweredd.com
 
loweredd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Struble IA
Posts: 808
here's a pic (hopefully)
Attached Images
 
loweredd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2003, 11:42 AM   #30
kxmotox247
Senior Member
 
kxmotox247's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 1,396
loweredd...Cool truck! Thanks for the pic.

Slammed67...Your website is awesome. I've checked it out before. Definately some good pictures on there. Do you have the floor back in your truck?

As far as my comments go about a 9" rear, that's what we use in our street rods and I know I can get parts cheaper for them. I was just thinking that if I had to weld a bunch of new brackets on my rear end, I might just start with a new rear considering mine probably needs freshened up and some kind of limited slip installed.

Thanks for everyone's help. I'll be deciding soon what to do. Bags sound more complicated than what I want to deal with. Perhaps I'd be better off with a set of dropped spindles and dropped springs. Might be quicker although the adjustability of ride height sure is appealing.
kxmotox247 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2003, 11:45 AM   #31
loweredd
www.loweredd.com
 
loweredd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Struble IA
Posts: 808
Quote:
Originally posted by kxmotox247
loweredd...Cool truck! Thanks for the pic.

As far as my comments go about a 9" rear, that's what we use in our street rods and I know I can get parts cheaper for them. I was just thinking that if I had to weld a bunch of new brackets on my rear end, I might just start with a new rear considering mine probably needs freshened up and some kind of limited slip installed.

Thanks for everyone's help. I'll be deciding soon what to do. Bags sound more complicated than what I want to deal with. Perhaps I'd be better off with a set of dropped spindles and dropped springs. Might be quicker although the adjustability of ride height sure is appealing.
No problem....it's not mine though.....Mine's in the garage getting air put on it. Once you get bags on, you'll never want anything else.

Makes sense about the 9 though. Might as well start out with a new axle tube to weld to!
loweredd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2003, 11:47 AM   #32
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,914
Uuhhmmm, I've always been under the impression that stock floor bodydrops were lowering the body in relation to the frame.... as in removing material from the top of the frame, not the bottom.

If you remove material from the bottom of the frame, it will allow you to plant the rockers flush w/the frame rails but only @ a very compressed ride height.

But.... removing the material from the top of the frame (and relocating the cab/body mounts) lowers the body (truck) while leaving the suspension (and ride) unchanged. The 'stock floor' part is just doing the drop w/o altering the floor pan of the truck/vehicle. A regular 'body drop' raises the floorpan for clearance & 'channeling' notches the floorpan for the higher frame-rail location only.

Someone correct me if I'm wrong.....
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2003, 11:51 AM   #33
loweredd
www.loweredd.com
 
loweredd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Struble IA
Posts: 808
On an S-10 Scoti the first stock floor description is correct. On these trucks, the only part that hangs down is right under the cab, and that is what gets chopped off.

*edit* Have you ever seen a truck with any body drop that was not on airbags?

Last edited by loweredd; 08-19-2003 at 11:53 AM.
loweredd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2003, 11:59 AM   #34
Izzy
Trucker.
 
Izzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,364
Quote:
Originally posted by SCOTI
Uuhhmmm, I've always been under the impression that stock floor bodydrops were lowering the body in relation to the frame.... as in removing material from the top of the frame, not the bottom.

If you remove material from the bottom of the frame, it will allow you to plant the rockers flush w/the frame rails but only @ a very compressed ride height.

But.... removing the material from the top of the frame (and relocating the cab/body mounts) lowers the body (truck) while leaving the suspension (and ride) unchanged. The 'stock floor' part is just doing the drop w/o altering the floor pan of the truck/vehicle. A regular 'body drop' raises the floorpan for clearance & 'channeling' notches the floorpan for the higher frame-rail location only.

Someone correct me if I'm wrong.....
Scoti you are correct a stock floor takes the top of the frame down not the bottom up. On 73-87’s we don’t have to worry since the bottom of the frame sits flush w/ the body.
Izzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2003, 12:08 PM   #35
loweredd
www.loweredd.com
 
loweredd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Struble IA
Posts: 808
Quote:
Originally posted by fiveeightchevy

Scoti you are correct a stock floor takes the top of the frame down not the bottom up. On 73-87’s we don’t have to worry since the bottom of the frame sits flush w/ the body.
Mine doesnt?
loweredd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2003, 12:10 PM   #36
Izzy
Trucker.
 
Izzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,364
Quote:
Originally posted by loweredd


Mine doesnt?
That'd be the first I've ever seen a 73-87 that the frame bottom doesn't sit level with the body. You have a stepside?
Izzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2003, 12:11 PM   #37
loweredd
www.loweredd.com
 
loweredd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Struble IA
Posts: 808
uh-uh, it's a LWB....the frame is down about 2 inches lower than the cab.
loweredd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2003, 12:14 PM   #38
Izzy
Trucker.
 
Izzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,364
Quote:
Originally posted by loweredd
uh-uh, it's a LWB....the frame is down about 2 inches lower than the cab.
AHH, I'm used to standard cab fleetside frames that sit level with the body. Once you raise the front cross member and tranny crossmember it's within an inch of laying body.

Learn something neve everyday.
Izzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2003, 12:28 PM   #39
loweredd
www.loweredd.com
 
loweredd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Struble IA
Posts: 808
a SWB is thast much different? I wonder why? Yeah, the front crossmember is WAY low, and the tranny cross and the tank actually is a little low too. BUT....then it still does have the frame. Within an inch blows though, LOL. I might even get rid of the pinch weld! Then I really need to lose some frame.

I dont want anyone to think I'm not agreeing with them (scoti). I suppose a stock floor could be anyway you wanted to do it.
loweredd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2003, 12:32 PM   #40
loweredd
www.loweredd.com
 
loweredd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Struble IA
Posts: 808
This is an S-10...but.....you could do a stock floor body drop this way.... It's still a body drop, and still a stock floor.
Attached Images
 
loweredd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2003, 12:53 PM   #41
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,914
No probs here....

Since I've got both the 67-72 model as well as a 73-up I've crawled under both to see what it takes to get them low & still be drivable. I'm not against planting the rockers on the pavement by airing out the suspension.... but for me, I like driving them low & still maintaining suspension travel, so it is for this reason I would remove material from the top of the frame before the bottom.

Weird thing is.... as close as the suspensions are between these year trucks (67-74) that I have, the 74 has less fenderwell area that the 67/8 does & although my 68 is actually lower than my 74, the 74 bottoms out much easier when going down the road. Both were dropped up front using the same methods/materials so there shouldn't be much difference & both of them are relatively flush as far as frame-rails vs. cab/rockers. I actually measured the difference on my 67swb in the garage & it was less than 3/4" & not worth the hassle of doing a body drop.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.

Last edited by SCOTI; 08-19-2003 at 05:25 PM.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2003, 01:20 PM   #42
fastbagged68
Registered User
 
fastbagged68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Tri Valley California
Posts: 792
Just another way to Stock Floor Body Drop one of our trucks- To put a peice of 2x4 square tubing along the frame rails. Weld it in there then cut off the top of the old frame and move down thecab mounts, there you have a stock floor body drop. There are a few other thing to do like cut off the horns and drop them down too. If you have a SWB- you should be able to to lay body with out body dropping it! Here is my partners 54 chevy. Its body dropped alot and is NOT on air.
Attached Images
 
fastbagged68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2003, 01:52 PM   #43
bagged81
Signals in the bumper.
 
bagged81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: East TN
Posts: 856
Man that stepside looks good! As soon as we get our garage built, I am dropping mine. I want to do some more serious cutting.
__________________
Jeff C.
1981 Chevrolet Silverado - Under major construction...again. link
1962 Chevrolet Impala 4D Sedan moredoorclassics.com
1936 Ford Pickup - Frame-off in progress link
1979 Chevrolet Camper Special Flatbed link
bagged81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2003, 02:05 PM   #44
loweredd
www.loweredd.com
 
loweredd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Struble IA
Posts: 808
That stepside is done by SilverStarCustoms.
loweredd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2003, 03:43 PM   #45
Izzy
Trucker.
 
Izzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,364
Quote:
Originally posted by loweredd
That stepside is done by SilverStarCustoms.
Eek.
Izzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2003, 03:43 PM   #46
Izzy
Trucker.
 
Izzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,364
Quote:
Originally posted by fastbagged68
Just another way to Stock Floor Body Drop one of our trucks- To put a peice of 2x4 square tubing along the frame rails. Weld it in there then cut off the top of the old frame and move down thecab mounts, there you have a stock floor body drop. There are a few other thing to do like cut off the horns and drop them down too. If you have a SWB- you should be able to to lay body with out body dropping it! Here is my partners 54 chevy. Its body dropped alot and is NOT on air.
That's normally what a stock floor body drop is unless you build a new frame.
Izzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2003, 03:49 PM   #47
loweredd
www.loweredd.com
 
loweredd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Struble IA
Posts: 808
Quote:
Originally posted by fiveeightchevy

Eek.
Huh?
loweredd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2003, 03:54 PM   #48
Izzy
Trucker.
 
Izzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,364
Quote:
Originally posted by loweredd


Huh?
I've seen silver star's work and it leaves a lot to be desired.
Izzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2003, 05:07 PM   #49
loweredd
www.loweredd.com
 
loweredd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Struble IA
Posts: 808
really? I've seen a few of thier cover trucks, and they look great! They just got done with one of my buddies truck, and the rear suspension is killer!
loweredd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2003, 05:08 PM   #50
loweredd
www.loweredd.com
 
loweredd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Struble IA
Posts: 808
here's the truck,
Attached Images
 
loweredd is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com