The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > All 4x4 Tech & Off Roading

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-10-2010, 08:14 AM   #1
propanemudtruck
Local Redneck Authority
 
propanemudtruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 584
Another fuel mileage debate...

Hello guys,

My 90 Chevy is a shortbox regular cab, 350 TBI, 700R4 (lockup not hooked up yet) and 3.42 gears. I've got a front and back plow on it and drive 50-55 mph to work. The only way to really tell is to try this out, but I have a theory yet to be proven.

http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/driveHabits.shtml

This link says overdrive always helps because it lowers engine rpms. I agree, in a passenger vehicle. BUT if the engine drops below a certain rpm with so much weight, would it be better for me to leave it in drive instead of overdrive? It seems more responsive and the truck isn't lagging as much.

Any input?

I assume the plows add another 600-900 lbs with all the heavy brackets, pump, valves, hoses and whatnot.
__________________
-Kevin

four on the floor feel the beat in your soul
movin to the rhythym pumpin til ya cant take no more
dance if you want to do what you came to
you cant ignore the feeling of that four on the floor
propanemudtruck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2010, 09:38 AM   #2
Josh
He's got mean nasty FANGS!
 
Josh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Rockwell, NC
Posts: 6,504
Re: Another fuel mileage debate...

Most engines at higher RPMs while cruising produce more power than is being consumed by the vehicle to move it along. A V8 will almost always get better gas mileage the lower you can keep engine speed, however, that is assuming there is enough torque output at that rpm to maintain vehicle speed. I'd try it both ways for a tank or two and see what works. What you wanna do is try to keep it in it's sweet spot of volumetric efficiency/peak torque.
__________________
2004 K2500 Burb
1999 C3500
1985 Cutlass Supreme
1969 C-10
1967 C-10 Panel
josh@67-72chevytrucks.com
Josh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2010, 11:15 AM   #3
propanemudtruck
Local Redneck Authority
 
propanemudtruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 584
Re: Another fuel mileage debate...

Right. I know a stock TBI 350 is no power monster but it runs pretty good. I still don't understand why my TBI blazer had so much more pickup and response with the same gears.

I figured next tank I'll try a run with just drive and see how it goes. W/O any extra weight of plows, the truck usually gets around 15 mpg. W/ the wind wall and weight added on, I figure I'll be about half that. So anything to get it any better will yield higher profit at the end of the season.
__________________
-Kevin

four on the floor feel the beat in your soul
movin to the rhythym pumpin til ya cant take no more
dance if you want to do what you came to
you cant ignore the feeling of that four on the floor
propanemudtruck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2010, 06:59 PM   #4
Prerunner1982
Registered User
 
Prerunner1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 5,906
Re: Another fuel mileage debate...

Is is necessary to drive 50-55mph to work?

I was able to get 20mpg out of my Jeep Cherokee just by driving 40mph to and from work instead of the posted 45-50mph. And of course ease in and off the gas as well. It isn't fun to drive mileage conscious.
__________________
Jon
1982 Chevy Silverado 350/th350.... RETIRED
1993 Jeep XJ 2 door(Cherokee) 4wd 4.0ltr/AX-15 (5spd)/NP231
....
Oklahoma Roll Call
Prerunner1982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2010, 09:26 PM   #5
Fursphere
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Rancho Cordova, CA
Posts: 54
Re: Another fuel mileage debate...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prerunner1982 View Post
Is is necessary to drive 50-55mph to work?

I was able to get 20mpg out of my Jeep Cherokee just by driving 40mph to and from work instead of the posted 45-50mph. And of course ease in and off the gas as well. It isn't fun to drive mileage conscious.
Here in California you'd get run off the road for driving under the posted limit.
__________________
1966 C10 Panel (3/4 Ton 4x4 Conversion)
2001 K1500 Silverado
Fursphere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2010, 07:45 AM   #6
special-K
Special Order

 
special-K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,863
Re: Another fuel mileage debate...

Your truck should be able to pull 1,000# w/o affecting it's power so drastically that it can't run at hiway speed in o/d within a proper rpm range.In my '92 I use 50 mph as the divide between using o/d or straight drive.I'd say I use more fuel running 45 in 4th that 55 in 5th.I'm sure I use less fuel at 50 in 5th than in 4th.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed"

GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project)
GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling)
Tim

"Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman"

R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~
special-K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2010, 02:15 PM   #7
propanemudtruck
Local Redneck Authority
 
propanemudtruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 584
Re: Another fuel mileage debate...

I drive about 11 miles to work, but I've got many miles of driving in my plow route once snow hits. The weight isn't so bad, but keep in mind I loose all aerodynamics if there was any to begin with a scooped wall in front of the grille.

40 mph isn't possible on a 55 mph road and I keep in mind if someone's behind and I'm under the limit I'll kick it up a bit.

But thanks for all the input
__________________
-Kevin

four on the floor feel the beat in your soul
movin to the rhythym pumpin til ya cant take no more
dance if you want to do what you came to
you cant ignore the feeling of that four on the floor
propanemudtruck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2010, 02:44 PM   #8
raycow
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA USA
Posts: 2,454
Re: Another fuel mileage debate...

There are two reasons why taller gearing saves fuel. One is the expected saving that results from reduced engine and accessory frictional losses. The other is that engine operation is more efficient at larger throttle openings. You save power on the intake stroke because you are pulling the piston down against less vacuum. I know this sounds trivial, but laboratory tests have shown that the saving is measurable.

Naturally, your fuel delivery system has to be calibrated properly for this to work. If the mixture goes too rich you will lose what you gain. Computer controlled injection in modern engines makes it easier of course, but it can still be made to work even with a carburetor.

Ray
__________________
Live more responsibly. Eat lower on the food chain. Eat vegetarians.

Last edited by raycow; 11-11-2010 at 02:45 PM.
raycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2010, 05:55 PM   #9
propanemudtruck
Local Redneck Authority
 
propanemudtruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 584
Re: Another fuel mileage debate...

I read something similar in one of the last few diesel magazines I read, there was a column like 50 reasons a diesel is better than a gasser and one reason is there is no such thing as running lean (it'll just stall) because there is no air flapper or butterfly on the intake just fuel modulation. The gasser has to fight to get air on every stroke and overcome that butterfly (creating vaccum)...
__________________
-Kevin

four on the floor feel the beat in your soul
movin to the rhythym pumpin til ya cant take no more
dance if you want to do what you came to
you cant ignore the feeling of that four on the floor
propanemudtruck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2010, 06:02 PM   #10
Prerunner1982
Registered User
 
Prerunner1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 5,906
Re: Another fuel mileage debate...

Quote:
Originally Posted by propanemudtruck View Post
40 mph isn't possible on a 55 mph road and I keep in mind if someone's behind and I'm under the limit I'll kick it up a bit.
It's called a speed limit not a speed requirement. If they are in so much of a damn hurry, I will give them ample opportunity to go around but until they pay for my gas I will be damned if someone else is going to dictate how I drive.

I get what you are saying though....
__________________
Jon
1982 Chevy Silverado 350/th350.... RETIRED
1993 Jeep XJ 2 door(Cherokee) 4wd 4.0ltr/AX-15 (5spd)/NP231
....
Oklahoma Roll Call
Prerunner1982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2010, 06:15 PM   #11
Psycho71
Registered User
 
Psycho71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kaufman, Tx
Posts: 827
Re: Another fuel mileage debate...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prerunner1982 View Post
It's called a speed limit not a speed requirement. If they are in so much of a damn hurry, I will give them ample opportunity to go around but until they pay for my gas I will be damned if someone else is going to dictate how I drive.

I get what you are saying though....

Another reason I don't like going to Oklahoma. And probably why you cuss us Texans.
__________________
You only need two tools in life - WD-40 and Duct Tape. If it doesn't move and should, use the WD-40. If it shouldn't move and does, use the duct tape.

If a hammer doesn't fix it, you have an electrical problem!



Slot Cars, 1:24 Scale, 100MPH@100,000RPM, fastest things on wheels!
Psycho71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2010, 06:47 PM   #12
raycow
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA USA
Posts: 2,454
Re: Another fuel mileage debate...

Quote:
Originally Posted by propanemudtruck View Post
one reason is there is no such thing as running lean (it'll just stall) because there is no air flapper or butterfly on the intake just fuel modulation. The gasser has to fight to get air on every stroke and overcome that butterfly (creating vaccum)...
You are absolutely right. The working fluid in any internal combustion engine is mostly air. The fuel contributes relatvely little mass or volume. A diesel gets a full charge of air on every intake stroke, while a gas engine gets a full charge only at wide open throttle.

Ray
__________________
Live more responsibly. Eat lower on the food chain. Eat vegetarians.

Last edited by raycow; 11-11-2010 at 08:53 PM.
raycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2010, 07:19 PM   #13
Prerunner1982
Registered User
 
Prerunner1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 5,906
Re: Another fuel mileage debate...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Psycho71 View Post
Another reason I don't like going to Oklahoma. And probably why you cuss us Texans.
Yeah.. we are smart enough to allow more than enough time to get to where we are goin'....
__________________
Jon
1982 Chevy Silverado 350/th350.... RETIRED
1993 Jeep XJ 2 door(Cherokee) 4wd 4.0ltr/AX-15 (5spd)/NP231
....
Oklahoma Roll Call
Prerunner1982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2010, 11:46 AM   #14
USSkoval
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: West Jefferson, OH
Posts: 999
Re: Another fuel mileage debate...

Two things, the first being very important.

1. Get the lock up working!!! You will overheat and kill the tranny with it disabled. Overdrive also isn't as effective without the lock up.

2. If you are going slow enough that the engine is lugging, it will likely help to drop down a gear. Next time you are driving 55mph in OD, without moving/changing the accelerator, drop down to drive. If the truck starts to go faster, then it is more efficient to run in D.
__________________
-Andy

'77 K5 Blazer
'78 K10 Shortbed
'78 C20 Suburban
'79 K30 Crew Cab Dually
'84 C10 Short Stepside
'88 K20 Suburban

USSkoval is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2010, 02:15 PM   #15
propanemudtruck
Local Redneck Authority
 
propanemudtruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 584
Re: Another fuel mileage debate...

1. The truck used to be a 5 speed and someone threw the auto in before I got it. Do I need to get a standalone harness/controller for it or should I look for a computer out of an automatic truck?

2. Thanks for the input. I'll try that tomorrow when I'm cruising around.
__________________
-Kevin

four on the floor feel the beat in your soul
movin to the rhythym pumpin til ya cant take no more
dance if you want to do what you came to
you cant ignore the feeling of that four on the floor
propanemudtruck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2010, 03:00 PM   #16
USSkoval
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: West Jefferson, OH
Posts: 999
Re: Another fuel mileage debate...

You can get a simple lock up kit from someone like B&M or TCI. Or you can even wire it up to a toggle switch... you just have to remember to turn it off when you slow down.
__________________
-Andy

'77 K5 Blazer
'78 K10 Shortbed
'78 C20 Suburban
'79 K30 Crew Cab Dually
'84 C10 Short Stepside
'88 K20 Suburban

USSkoval is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2010, 08:14 PM   #17
propanemudtruck
Local Redneck Authority
 
propanemudtruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 584
Re: Another fuel mileage debate...

Wonder if there's a relay I could use a push button to engage and hitting the brakes would cancel it. Is that similar to how the aftermarket kits go?
__________________
-Kevin

four on the floor feel the beat in your soul
movin to the rhythym pumpin til ya cant take no more
dance if you want to do what you came to
you cant ignore the feeling of that four on the floor
propanemudtruck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2010, 08:43 PM   #18
raycow
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA USA
Posts: 2,454
Re: Another fuel mileage debate...

Quote:
Originally Posted by propanemudtruck View Post
Wonder if there's a relay I could use a push button to engage and hitting the brakes would cancel it. Is that similar to how the aftermarket kits go?
A push button and a latching relay would do the job, but you don't really need that much extra hardware unless you want the lockup to work in all gears (not 1st gear though, because a stock transmission won't allow it - this is prevented hydraulically, not electrically).

All of these transmissions I have looked at already had a 4th gear switch installed from the factory, so you don't really need a kit. Just wire it so the solenoid power goes through the 4th gear switch. That's basically what the kits do. You can still add a manual switch for when you DON'T want the lockup, but there is no need to turn it off when you slow down, because the converter will unlock as soon as the transmission shifts out of 4th gear anyway.

Ray
__________________
Live more responsibly. Eat lower on the food chain. Eat vegetarians.
raycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2010, 12:43 AM   #19
USSkoval
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: West Jefferson, OH
Posts: 999
Re: Another fuel mileage debate...

The kits I've seen also have a vacuum switch that only allows lock up during lower engine loads.
__________________
-Andy

'77 K5 Blazer
'78 K10 Shortbed
'78 C20 Suburban
'79 K30 Crew Cab Dually
'84 C10 Short Stepside
'88 K20 Suburban

USSkoval is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2010, 03:29 AM   #20
propanemudtruck
Local Redneck Authority
 
propanemudtruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 584
Re: Another fuel mileage debate...

at what amount of vaccum? Do engines measure in inches water column like gas pressure? I work in a technical support team for a water heater manufacturer.

Thanks again to all for the input and ideas
__________________
-Kevin

four on the floor feel the beat in your soul
movin to the rhythym pumpin til ya cant take no more
dance if you want to do what you came to
you cant ignore the feeling of that four on the floor
propanemudtruck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2010, 03:31 PM   #21
red71cheyenne
Back in the sticks
 
red71cheyenne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Fordland, MO
Posts: 3,188
Re: Another fuel mileage debate...

Quote:
Originally Posted by raycow View Post
A push button and a latching relay would do the job, but you don't really need that much extra hardware unless you want the lockup to work in all gears (not 1st gear though, because a stock transmission won't allow it - this is prevented hydraulically, not electrically).

All of these transmissions I have looked at already had a 4th gear switch installed from the factory, so you don't really need a kit. Just wire it so the solenoid power goes through the 4th gear switch. That's basically what the kits do. You can still add a manual switch for when you DON'T want the lockup, but there is no need to turn it off when you slow down, because the converter will unlock as soon as the transmission shifts out of 4th gear anyway.

Ray
You can also wire them from the brake switch in the cab to perform the same function. Using the normally closed side of the switch allows the converter to unlock when you step on the brakes. I originally wired my 700r4 this way, but went with a hydraulic lock up on the rebuild. It automatically locks up around 35 when in 3rd or 4th. I always think its 3rd.
__________________
1971 Cheyenne C-10 w/700R4 and Tuned Port Injection
1969 K5 Blazer w/Tuned Port
2010 2SS/RS Flaming Orange Camaro
2011 K1500 Suburban
2014 K1500 Pickup
2008 Nissan Altima? The wifes' hoopty

Last edited by red71cheyenne; 11-13-2010 at 03:33 PM. Reason: info
red71cheyenne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2010, 04:05 PM   #22
raycow
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA USA
Posts: 2,454
Re: Another fuel mileage debate...

Quote:
Originally Posted by propanemudtruck View Post
at what amount of vaccum? Do engines measure in inches water column like gas pressure?
Inches of mercury. Most stock engines with a mild cam will be able to pull about 18-20" at idle. I think the transmission vacuum switches are usually set to open somewhere around 4-6", but some of the aftermarket switches are adjustable.

Ray
__________________
Live more responsibly. Eat lower on the food chain. Eat vegetarians.

Last edited by raycow; 11-15-2010 at 11:21 PM.
raycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2010, 10:49 PM   #23
special-K
Special Order

 
special-K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,863
Re: Another fuel mileage debate...

Plows will kill your aerodynamics and effect mileage...true.But,when I plowed I only had the plow mounted when out to plow.The fuel consumption going to between jobs was excellent compared to while plowing.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed"

GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project)
GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling)
Tim

"Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman"

R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~
special-K is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com