The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/index.php)
-   1969 - 1972 Blazers and Jimmys Projects and Builds (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/forumdisplay.php?f=211)
-   -   Buried to Bagged 1972 2wd (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/showthread.php?t=654650)

ajgriffin 12-27-2016 11:47 AM

Re: Buried to Bagged 1972 2wd
 
Also, I've been told that hydroboost can be noisy. I'm not sure if that's normal operation or if that's when there's a problem.

knomadd 12-28-2016 10:54 AM

Re: Buried to Bagged 1972 2wd
 
Looking good! I hope you get the hydroboost mount figured out. I love how mine operate on my truck and GTO. They stop about as well as a new car.

Quote:

Originally Posted by reaper71 (Post 7806272)
I have noticed that alot of Guy's are going the Hydraboost direction.
(I'm NOT telling anyone how to build their rig) but in my personal experience I had a Hdraboost system go out while driving and you not only lose you Brakes but your Steering as well at the same time! It was the scariest thing I've had happen in along time. JMO Guys! I wouldn't want to see anyone get hurt or worse.

Mark...

I agree with Mark on one thing. It would be pretty scary to lose steering and brakes at once.

So you aren't scared off by Mark's experience I'll tell you what I know of the systems. I understand that when they fail, you would lose steering and brakes, but it's not a complete loss of either system. It's just like if your power steering pump goes out, you still have steering, it's just harder to do. It would be the same for the brakes. You can still stop and steer, it just takes more effort. If you break a line and lose all fluid, you would simply have a dry pump and no hydraulic assist. The manual connection is still there. If your brakes fail, you always have an e-brake (unless you removed it).

Quote:

Originally Posted by ajgriffin (Post 7806318)
Also, I've been told that hydroboost can be noisy. I'm not sure if that's normal operation or if that's when there's a problem.

I've never heard a hydroboost system. I assume it would only be if you have a problem. Both of mine are as quiet as a church mouse.

Again, I'm not an expert and I don't claim to be. I've only had the experience of the two systems on my vehicles.

Slick67 01-20-2017 01:06 AM

Re: Buried to Bagged 1972 2wd
 
1 Attachment(s)
Well, this is kind of what I am thinking. Maybe a little darker blue than pictured but the rest is pretty close.
Attachment 1613146

ajgriffin 01-20-2017 01:51 AM

Re: Buried to Bagged 1972 2wd
 
:metal:

Slick67 01-20-2017 02:18 AM

Re: Buried to Bagged 1972 2wd
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ajgriffin (Post 7832603)
:metal:

Lol, Thanks!!

Slick67 01-20-2017 02:22 AM

Re: Buried to Bagged 1972 2wd
 
1 Attachment(s)
It might just work. The 55 Bel Air dash is much shorter than a Blazer dash, buy hey, we do this for the love of PITA.
Attachment 1613169

knomadd 01-20-2017 10:30 AM

Re: Buried to Bagged 1972 2wd
 
It's just metal work... You obviously love doing metal work :lol:

It'll look good when you're done with it. I like the rendering too. Keep it up!

mcbassin 01-20-2017 11:51 AM

Re: Buried to Bagged 1972 2wd
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Slick67 (Post 7832583)
Well, this is kind of what I am thinking. Maybe a little darker blue than pictured but the rest is pretty close.
Attachment 1613146

Fricken sweet!!!
:metal:

68jewel 01-22-2017 03:01 PM

Re: Buried to Bagged 1972 2wd
 
The rendering is sick and love the idea of the 57 dash.

Slick67 01-22-2017 08:56 PM

Re: Buried to Bagged 1972 2wd
 
[quote=knomadd;7832776]It's just metal work... You obviously love doing metal work :lol:

It'll look good when you're done with it. I like the rendering too. Keep it up!
[/QUOTEI'm new to metal working, but love it!!!! A challenge is exactly what I want right now. I hope it turns out as nice as I am imagining it will!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcbassin (Post 7832844)
Fricken sweet!!!
:metal:

Lol, you are a man of few words. But thank you!!!! :lol:

Quote:

Originally Posted by 68jewel (Post 7834843)
The rendering is sick and love the idea of the 57 dash.

Thank you!! It's a 55 dash from a car, but we'll see how it turns out.

Slick67 01-22-2017 09:03 PM

Re: Buried to Bagged 1972 2wd
 
1 Attachment(s)
Got a little done today!!! I was seriously slacking for the past few months so it felt good to make some headway!! Almost completed the driver side, just a little more grinding. The passenger side is gonna have to wait till next weekend. :whine:
Attachment 1614139

Slick67 01-22-2017 09:47 PM

Re: Buried to Bagged 1972 2wd
 
1 Attachment(s)
Almost forgot......
Attachment 1614161

reaper71 01-23-2017 10:31 AM

Re: Buried to Bagged 1972 2wd
 
Looking Good.....

Mark..

Slick67 04-05-2017 01:50 AM

Re: Buried to Bagged 1972 2wd
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by reaper71 (Post 7835698)
Looking Good.....

Mark..

Thank You Sir!

Slick67 04-05-2017 02:08 AM

Re: Buried to Bagged 1972 2wd
 
4 Attachment(s)
The longest wait ever!!! Powdercoat always makes me happy. They did an awesome job on it, thank you North Side Powder Coating!!!!
Attachment 1639168

Attachment 1639169

Attachment 1639170

Attachment 1639171

Slick67 04-05-2017 02:12 AM

Re: Buried to Bagged 1972 2wd
 
2 Attachment(s)
A little more Blazer porn!! I built a bracket to hold my airride stuff. Love those shiney Viair compressors! :devil:
Attachment 1639172

Attachment 1639173

smbrouss70 04-05-2017 12:36 PM

Re: Buried to Bagged 1972 2wd
 
Where will you tank and compressors go? I'm trying to figure out where I can fit them on my Blazer.

Slick67 04-05-2017 08:01 PM

Re: Buried to Bagged 1972 2wd
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by smbrouss70 (Post 7907187)
Where will you tank and compressors go? I'm trying to figure out where I can fit them on my Blazer.

Between the c-notches was the best place I could find for mine and the way that I am building it out. You may not want to cut as much as I did.:ito:

Slick67 04-05-2017 08:07 PM

Re: Buried to Bagged 1972 2wd
 
3 Attachment(s)
This thing looks awesome!! I am really happy with my last minute color choices that I made with the powdercoat.
Attachment 1639322
Yes, those are LEDs in the frame for a little accent lighting. A throwback to Slick67.
Attachment 1639323

Attachment 1639324

Slick67 04-07-2017 12:11 AM

Re: Buried to Bagged 1972 2wd
 
3 Attachment(s)
A little more powdercoating done to finish off the bracket I made to hold everything. I did some quick hardlines to see how they look, me likey!!!
Attachment 1639722

Attachment 1639729

Attachment 1639730

Bennett68C10 04-07-2017 08:15 AM

Re: Buried to Bagged 1972 2wd
 
Awesome!

mcbassin 04-07-2017 09:00 AM

Re: Buried to Bagged 1972 2wd
 
Chassis looks incredible!!! :metal:

Slick67 04-11-2017 09:28 PM

Re: Buried to Bagged 1972 2wd
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bennett68C10 (Post 7908950)
Awesome!

Thank you, finally making a little progress!

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcbassin (Post 7908971)
Chassis looks incredible!!! :metal:

Thank you!!! I can't wait to get the body on it just to have a glimpse into the future!

Slick67 04-11-2017 09:31 PM

Re: Buried to Bagged 1972 2wd
 
2 Attachment(s)
Now it's lookin like something!!! Sure does look different now!
Attachment 1641287

Attachment 1641288

Slick67 04-11-2017 10:17 PM

Re: Buried to Bagged 1972 2wd
 
Don't be shy!!! Comment!! Let's hear some feedback or questions!!!:metal:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com