The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/index.php)
-   LSx Swaps (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/forumdisplay.php?f=206)
-   -   Return vs. return less fuel rail (https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/showthread.php?t=701484)

65standard 03-19-2016 07:09 PM

Return vs. return less fuel rail
 
My 6.0 has the old style fuel rail with the return line. Is it better to use the returnless fuel rail and corvette filter/regulator or my original setup. I have access to the later style if needed.

I just finished up my frame and I ready to start my LSx swap.

I got my new spectra GM11C gas tank and it doesn't have the baffle. It is the same as my original tank (GM11B). So I'm a lilttle bummed out.

mongocanfly 03-19-2016 07:36 PM

Re: Return vs. return less fuel rail
 
I capped my return line on the fuel rail of my 6.0 and am running the vette filter/reg..no issues and works great.

65standard 03-19-2016 07:51 PM

Re: Return vs. return less fuel rail
 
What did you do with the vacuum diaphragm and vacuum line?

Robznob11 03-19-2016 08:53 PM

Re: Return vs. return less fuel rail
 
If it's in place go return. Less wear on pump bullheading less heating the fuel. Better down the road if you want more hp. All big fuel systems use a return.

foamypirate 03-19-2016 09:04 PM

Re: Return vs. return less fuel rail
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 65standard (Post 7528289)
I got my new spectra GM11C gas tank and it doesn't have the baffle. It is the same as my original tank (GM11B). So I'm a lilttle bummed out.

It was probably boxed incorrectly. The GM11C and GM1C should definitely have baffles in them. I would return and ask for a new one.

Here are mine that I recently ordered, showing the baffle.

http://foamypirate.com/img/88chevy/l...m/image010.jpg

65standard 03-19-2016 09:38 PM

Re: Return vs. return less fuel rail
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by foamypirate (Post 7528389)
It was probably boxed incorrectly. The GM11C and GM1C should definitely have baffles in them. I would return and ask for a new one....


That is what I was thinking too. The new tank isn't stamped with the part number like my GM11B tank is. It only gas a small sticker on it with GM11A on it. Have no idea what GM11A tank is for.

65standard 03-19-2016 09:44 PM

Re: Return vs. return less fuel rail
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Robznob11 (Post 7528369)
If it's in place go return. Less wear on pump bullheading less heating the fuel. Better down the road if you want more hp. All big fuel systems use a return.

It would be easier just to stay with the return system I have and just use a fuel filter designed for it.

Robznob11 03-19-2016 09:47 PM

Re: Return vs. return less fuel rail
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 65standard (Post 7528437)
It would be easier just to stay with the return system I have and just use a fuel filter designed for it.

And better for the system,parts and performance

foamypirate 03-19-2016 10:16 PM

Re: Return vs. return less fuel rail
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 65standard (Post 7528427)
That is what I was thinking too. The new tank isn't stamped with the part number like my GM11B tank is. It only gas a small sticker on it with GM11A on it. Have no idea what GM11A tank is for.

I looked it up, it's an 80' and earlier Squarebody tank, looks to have a smaller filler neck.

ls1nova71 03-20-2016 12:02 AM

Re: Return vs. return less fuel rail
 
I would use the return if you have it. A $10 fuel filter is way better when it comes time to change it than a $60 filter that can have a bad regulator straight out of the box. Also vacuum referenced fuel pressure versus a set pressure, so you have to tune for it. I'll never understand peoples infatuation with the returnless rail.....

Hart_Rod 03-20-2016 10:36 AM

Re: Return vs. return less fuel rail
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ls1nova71 (Post 7528572)
I would use the return if you have it. A $10 fuel filter is way better when it comes time to change it than a $60 filter that can have a bad regulator straight out of the box. Also vacuum referenced fuel pressure versus a set pressure, so you have to tune for it. I'll never understand peoples infatuation with the returnless rail.....

It's easy...........................:lol::exit:...................:sexy:!

foamypirate 03-20-2016 01:58 PM

Re: Return vs. return less fuel rail
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ls1nova71 (Post 7528572)
I would use the return if you have it. A $10 fuel filter is way better when it comes time to change it than a $60 filter that can have a bad regulator straight out of the box. Also vacuum referenced fuel pressure versus a set pressure, so you have to tune for it. I'll never understand peoples infatuation with the returnless rail.....

I used it because that's how my LQ9 came. $60 is way too much to pay for the filter, I got mine for $30, WIX brand.

65standard 03-23-2016 05:21 PM

Re: Return vs. return less fuel rail
 
For the record, my replacement GM11C gas tank came in today. This one has the pan inside the tank and the correct 1 5/8" filler neck.

foamypirate 03-23-2016 06:56 PM

Re: Return vs. return less fuel rail
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 65standard (Post 7532996)
For the record, my replacement GM11C gas tank came in today. This one has the pan inside the tank and the correct 1 5/8" filler neck.

Right on! :metal:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com