Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-23-2023, 05:38 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Temple City
Posts: 3,559
|
Port vs direct injection
I work graveyard as a glorified security guard, and in a 10 hour shift I usually only have about 4 hours of work to do. So I research things to pass time or watch history videos.
As I have stated before my 307 was improperly rebuilt, and I want to replace it before I have to replace it. So right now I am researching options that may or may not be as ideal as I thought or as economically worth while. So have any of you guys did a direct injection motor, and wished you just went with port? Or the other way around. Are the issues with port injection clogging intake valves with carbon over stated? |
03-23-2023, 08:58 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Carlos MN
Posts: 1,922
|
Re: Port vs direct injection
I've had both LS and LT engines. Never had had an issue with either. They get a bit more power out of LT with the direct injection. They upped the compression in the 6.2's (I had 2015 Silverado with a 6.2 and currently drive a 2020 Silverado with direct injection a 6.2) so it's get's better mileage. I haven't had a 5.3 with direct injection.
My 20 Silverado at 60 MPH will knock down 20-22 MPG no problem. Both 6.2's were are 4x4's. |
03-23-2023, 10:17 PM | #3 |
BMW & ASE Master Certified
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,255
|
Re: Port vs direct injection
direct injection is more efficient, but components to fix are more expensive
carbon buildup will be a problem, but, the intakes are easy to remove, but need to clean the ports with tools or walnut blaster oil catch can if installed right might help some Lt swap vs Ls swap is way more expensive question might be, how much do you WANT to spend
__________________
1987 Silverado - L83 5.3 w/ 6L80e ,A/C,P/W,P/L,TILT, HID projectors, Wilwood C-10 Pro Spindles w/ 2018 silverado front brakes & C-5 Corvette Rear Disc Brakes 1999 BMW 528i - 5.7 LS1 w/ 4l60e, Ford 8.8 IRS w31 spline posi & FX-r projector retrofit New project: 2006 BMW x5 6cyl AWD to L83 6l80e 4wd to 2WD / RWD A poor man buy's it twice finally got my domain name back, 87chevy.com.... site rework in progress |
03-24-2023, 07:08 AM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 478
|
Re: Port vs direct injection
I have an LS in my car and an L83 (LT) in the truck. It is one of those "6 of one have dozen of another" type questions. The LT is more expensive, but the engines are cheaper. Finding a low mileage LS these days is about impossible, or they want a ton of money. You can go crate engine, but they aren't exactly cheap either.
I paid $3800 for the L83 with a 6L trans. They had 30k miles. The cam, lifters oil pan, headers, etc were all about the same price as an LS. The wiring was more. The hard part was finding somebody to tune it correctly as nobody wanted to touch it in a swap vehicle. If I had to do it again, I would probably find an LS variant due to just having a ton more options on cams etc. |
03-24-2023, 09:29 AM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: washington
Posts: 2,159
|
Re: Port vs direct injection
The LS engine family is the way to go.
It's true you can get motor power and efficiency using a LT but the price to get them running is likely more than twice the LS family. I just looked into a LT wiring conversion, for a friend, and just the wiring was over $3K. That's without a tune. He plans on running a stock motor, no tune required. Putting the harness money into internals (cam and heads) on a LS will likely get you more power for less money. The holly grail, more reliable power for less money. The LT engine can run higher compression, which equates to an efficiency boost. It does this by not injection the fuel till it's required. (Can't detonate if there isn't and fuel in the chamber) They are cool if you have the deep pockets required to get them running. |
03-24-2023, 02:44 PM | #6 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 478
|
Re: Port vs direct injection
Quote:
Really...they are not that much more money. All the mechanical items (cam, liters, pushrods, headers etc.) are pretty close to the same price especially if you stay under a 2019 model. 2019 and later have a locked computer and that will set you back quite a bit to have it unlocked. By the time you find a 120-150k used LS style engine, have it all rebuilt, then still have to go with a harness etc, you could easily dump in a L86 with a 8 or 10 speed trans with 25k miles and be ahead. |
|
03-24-2023, 04:45 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Carlos MN
Posts: 1,922
|
Re: Port vs direct injection
In regards to the 8 or 10 speed trans option my real world expirience. My 2015 Silverado had the 6.2/8 speed combo. Bought it new. In the winter when it was cold out and the truck was cold the 1-2 and 2-3 shifts were always harsh until the truck warmed up. And sometimes cold or warm the down shift as you came up to a stop light was harsh. Had it back to the dealership for updated programming a few times. Never really fixed the issue. Never left me anywhere but annoying. Over on LS1tech.com the 8 speed gets no love at all.
So my current 2020 Silverado with the 6.2/10 speed combo is sweet. In the normal mode the trans shifts like butter. If you go to the sport mode the shifts are a bit more sharp and move up on the rpm a bit. I could be wrong but I'm thinking all direct injection 5.3/6.2's have VVT and DOD. |
03-24-2023, 06:46 PM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: washington
Posts: 2,159
|
Re: Port vs direct injection
The motor is a 2017 LT1 from a Camaro with the 8 speed transmission. Joyriding called it the price was the set up from GM.
Who the the motor harness for you? Some more information I dug up on the EcoTec3 Engine Family. The EcoTec3 engine family features three state-of-the-art technologies: Direct injection Cylinder deactivation Continuously variable valve timing The EcoTec3 lineup consists of the following power-plants: 4.3L V6 LV3 5.3L V8 L83 6.2L V8 L86 Still working on differences between the LT1 motor and the L86. |
03-24-2023, 07:05 PM | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 478
|
Re: Port vs direct injection
The only difference between LT1 and L86 is tuning and the intake. The L86 is a truck so they use longer runners. It is a better intake than the LT1, but not quite as good as an LT2 or MSD. The oil pan is also different as the truck is deeper. Everything else is the same right down to t \he cam, but you will see higher hp gains with the L86 with cam changes due to the truck intake.
This guy did my wiring. The only catch is he will not mess with it if you mention you are going to put a big cam in it etc. After I got it, I put a huge cam in my L83. I had zero problems. Ken Wolkens is his name. StandAloneHarness.com When I installed the cam, I put in a DOD delete kit, 4 degree cam phaser, and a BTR 220 cam. I had to do springs also. Pretty much the same as a Gen 4 L99 or similar. The only issue was the P/S pump, but i got that from American Billet. It fit in place of the vacuum pump. The other issue is no tach or speedo output from the trans. Dakota Digital fixed that. |
03-25-2023, 08:02 AM | #10 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 478
|
Re: Port vs direct injection
Quote:
|
|
03-25-2023, 12:30 PM | #11 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 2,876
|
Re: Port vs direct injection
Quote:
22 March, 2023 Last good transmissions out of GM were the Powerglide, Turbo 350 and Turbo 400. Yes they would still go bad if fluid not changed or abused, but cheap to fix. Everything after from the factory has been junk unless rebuilt and modified. -klb
__________________
67 C10 fleet fuel injected '70 402, 700r4, 3.73 posi 07 335 sport turbo 6sp 94 Trans Am GT LT1 6sp posi -- sold after 22yrs 99 540 sport V8 6sp -- sold 73 240z L24 4sp -- given to friend 68 C10 step 350/350 3.73 open -- sold |
|
03-29-2023, 09:38 PM | #12 | |
BMW & ASE Master Certified
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,255
|
Re: Port vs direct injection
Quote:
__________________
1987 Silverado - L83 5.3 w/ 6L80e ,A/C,P/W,P/L,TILT, HID projectors, Wilwood C-10 Pro Spindles w/ 2018 silverado front brakes & C-5 Corvette Rear Disc Brakes 1999 BMW 528i - 5.7 LS1 w/ 4l60e, Ford 8.8 IRS w31 spline posi & FX-r projector retrofit New project: 2006 BMW x5 6cyl AWD to L83 6l80e 4wd to 2WD / RWD A poor man buy's it twice finally got my domain name back, 87chevy.com.... site rework in progress |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|