The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-03-2010, 02:53 AM   #1
blazerboy_4life
70Custom10
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Rapid City, SD
Posts: 322
Anybody ever heard of "Fish" Carburetors and their supposed 100+mpg??

Just went down to Denver yesterday and on the way home stopped to see my grandfather. He was cleaning out the garage when i pulled up and gave me a few things like and engine stand and a Fish Carburetor. He said he got 22mpg out of a 410? olds motor. Anybody ever heard of these carbs and their reliability/power/ridiculous mpg ratings? All the articles Ive dug up keep talking about 100+ mpg off most any V8.
blazerboy_4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2010, 08:40 AM   #2
Shane
Account Suspended
 
Shane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: over yonder
Posts: 14,270
Re: Anybody ever heard of "Fish" Carburetors and their supposed 100+mpg??

google ...
Shane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2010, 10:32 AM   #3
cam.man67
Registered User
 
cam.man67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Jefferson, MD
Posts: 2,397
Re: Anybody ever heard of "Fish" Carburetors and their supposed 100+mpg??

just did some research on 'em. The 100+ mpg claim is totally bogus, nor did Fish ever claim that. He did claim that is was a more efficient design than any other carb out there, and that was true.

From what I see, a Fish carb is an incredibly simple design (only 17 parts, 1 gasket, and 3 moving parts). Works pretty well for racing, or so I see.

I'd love to try one out on my truck, see if I can hit 18-20 mpg, but, alas, a "new" one costs $850.
__________________
'68 Dodge Dart 270, 225, 904, 2.76--"Lucy"
1996 Gmc 1500 Z71, 350, 4l60e, 3.73s
1995 Jeep Wrangler Rio Grande 2.5, AX5, 4.10s
1989 Toyota Pickup 22re, auto, 3.73
cam.man67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2010, 10:42 AM   #4
63chevyll
gets board easy.......
 
63chevyll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 717
Re: Anybody ever heard of "Fish" Carburetors and their supposed 100+mpg??

sounds pretty cool
63chevyll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2010, 11:14 AM   #5
cdowns
Senior Member
 
cdowns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: daytonabeach
Posts: 22,956
Re: Anybody ever heard of "Fish" Carburetors and their supposed 100+mpg??

that's why they call it fishin and not catchin
__________________
71c-10 350/2004r/4:11 lowered3/4 longbed/dead by hurricane

MEANING OF DEATH::::: SOMEBODY ELSE GETS YOUR STUFF

DONT BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU THINK

TAKE MY ADVISE;I DON'T USE IT ANYWAY
cdowns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2010, 12:28 AM   #6
blazerboy_4life
70Custom10
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Rapid City, SD
Posts: 322
Re: Anybody ever heard of "Fish" Carburetors and their supposed 100+mpg??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shane View Post
I was hoping for more personal experience. Google was the first place I went THEN I came you guys.
blazerboy_4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2010, 08:30 AM   #7
Shane
Account Suspended
 
Shane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: over yonder
Posts: 14,270
Re: Anybody ever heard of "Fish" Carburetors and their supposed 100+mpg??

ok.
Shane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2010, 08:39 AM   #8
71meangreenc10
Its a Truck Thing......
 
71meangreenc10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sierra Vista, Arizona
Posts: 3,158
Re: Anybody ever heard of "Fish" Carburetors and their supposed 100+mpg??

Yeah,
Cant get past that $850 price tag......I have never heard of it either, I go through the summit and Jegs catalogs, even LMC never saw it. Ill look and see if JC whitney promotes it.....

Also supprised that during the $4-5 bucks a gallon spike a couple years ago didnt get this air time,,unless it was just a local product.

Smitty
__________________
71 C10 283/3SPD Full Resto
71 GMC 1500 Sierra Grande http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=518599
70 C10 Suburban Former military GSA truck.
72 Chevy Blazer 4X4, Sloppy Jo, Mountain Climber. Wife says no more trucks. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=707378
72 GMC 1 Ton Motor Home, wife said no more trucks until she saw this one. Gen 3 6.0/4L80E 4.10 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=761110
68 GMC Suburban was 3/4 ton, now 1/2.Wife shook her head
71 C30 Wrecker
71 C20 Scott-Bilt As weird as it gets..BB Cheyenne AC Truck
68 GMC Long Stepside. They keep following me home
71 C20 Longhorn/Ole Yellor
69 C30 Former Motor Home, Flat Bed time

Last edited by 71meangreenc10; 11-04-2010 at 08:43 AM.
71meangreenc10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2011, 12:53 PM   #9
blazerboy_4life
70Custom10
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Rapid City, SD
Posts: 322
Re: Anybody ever heard of "Fish" Carburetors and their supposed 100+mpg??

Right now im trying to find an intake I can bolt it up to. It doesnt match my 2bbl.
blazerboy_4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2011, 01:02 PM   #10
MARKDTN
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 2,131
Re: Anybody ever heard of "Fish" Carburetors and their supposed 100+mpg??

Quote:
Originally Posted by 71meangreenc10 View Post
Yeah,
Cant get past that $850 price tag......I have never heard of it either, I go through the summit and Jegs catalogs, even LMC never saw it. Ill look and see if JC whitney promotes it.....

Also supprised that during the $4-5 bucks a gallon spike a couple years ago didnt get this air time,,unless it was just a local product.

Smitty
It's not a new product, been around a long long time.
__________________
'83 K20-TPI
'73 C10
'79 C10-ex-diesel(SOLD)
'07 Tahoe(Son driving)
'14 Suburban-DD
'71 C10-current project
MARKDTN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2011, 01:06 PM   #11
blazerboy_4life
70Custom10
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Rapid City, SD
Posts: 322
Re: Anybody ever heard of "Fish" Carburetors and their supposed 100+mpg??

Quote:
Originally Posted by MARKDTN View Post
It's not a new product, been around a long long time.
Yeah this one that my grandfather gave me he used to run back in the 70's
blazerboy_4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2011, 01:55 PM   #12
mrein3
Registered User
 
mrein3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Center City, MN, USA
Posts: 3,253
Re: Anybody ever heard of "Fish" Carburetors and their supposed 100+mpg??

Quote:
Originally Posted by 71meangreenc10 View Post
Yeah,
Cant get past that $850 price tag......I have never heard of it either, I go through the summit and Jegs catalogs, even LMC never saw it. Ill look and see if JC whitney promotes it.....

Also supprised that during the $4-5 bucks a gallon spike a couple years ago didnt get this air time,,unless it was just a local product.

Smitty
I'm surprised we haven't heard more snake oil type things now that gas is headed back up. Before I read this post I'm quoting I was going to mention that we always hear this stuff while gas goes up in price.

Somebody should keep track. First its the 100+ mpg carb that big oil and big car companies bought the rights to.
Then we'll hear about the magnets on the gas line.
Then we'll hear about injecting hydrogen into the carb.
Then we'll hear about the air cleaner that swirls the air and improves mileage.
Then we'll hear about the split fire spark plugs that studies have shown improve mileage.

Folks its a broken record that gets spinning when gas goes up. With today's fleet fuel mileage requirements do you really think a car company is going to keep something that gets 100+ mpg on the shelf? When Ford says use 5w-20 because it gives them an across the board 0.1% increase in fuel mileage do you think they are sitting on a 100mpg carb? When Chevrolet shuts down extra cylinders at cruise on the highway do you think they are sitting on a 100 mpg carb?

What did P. T. Barnum say? "There is a sucker born every minute"

And those suckers buy lots of the above mentioned products. [I'm not saying the fish carb isn't a fine working carb, I'm just saying that it won't get 100+ mpg in a 5000 pound truck]
__________________
'70 cab, '71 chassis, 383, TH350, NP205.
'71 Malibu convertible
'72 Malibu hard top
Center City, MN
mrein3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2011, 02:10 PM   #13
leddzepp
Moderator
 
leddzepp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Southern Cal
Posts: 19,981
Re: Anybody ever heard of "Fish" Carburetors and their supposed 100+mpg??

Wonder if Barney Miller used one?
__________________
1972 C/10 Cheyenne Super SWB. Restored, loaded, slammed.

1968 C/10 50th Anniversary LWB. Unrestored, stock, daily driver/work truck.


RIP ElJay
RIP 67ChevyRedneck
RIP Grumpy Old Man
leddzepp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2011, 02:21 PM   #14
Tkmadone
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 193
Re: Anybody ever heard of "Fish" Carburetors and their supposed 100+mpg??

I had one on my MGB for a while. I went from 21mpg to about 23. It was cool because it was so simple and I would have kept it but it didn't have a choke so it was annoying when cold. I think I still have it somewhere...
Tkmadone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2011, 02:24 PM   #15
DANTIP
Registered User
 
DANTIP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA
Posts: 1,880
Re: Anybody ever heard of "Fish" Carburetors and their supposed 100+mpg??

A friend of mine is an engineer at Ford and specializes in port fuel-injection system design. We have had many conversations regarding carburetors, fuel-injection, fuel mix ratios, etc. My wife doesn't hang around long when we talk. Basically, gasoline engines operate properly when the optimum mixture of fuel and air is maintained. These guys get into enormous detail but it comes down to mixing the best/optimum amount of fuel with a given (or measured) amount of air. He admitted the best performing carburetor for road-driven vehicles is a properly set-up Quadrajet. Their testing shows a Q-Jet can approach port fuel-injection performance and economy.

Claims of dramatically better fuel economy with different gadgets aren't real.

My friend did convince me to buy a digital read-out system for carburetor set-up. These devices rely on an O2 sensor (you have to weld a bung into the exhaust pipe) to give you a mixture readout. With this and a setup procedure for the Q-jet, you can feel good about your carb performance. Indiana does not require any testing of tailpipe emissions, but I'll bet the mixture device could help you nail a lean setup that would aid in passing a sniff test.
DANTIP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2011, 02:26 PM   #16
blazerboy_4life
70Custom10
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Rapid City, SD
Posts: 322
Re: Anybody ever heard of "Fish" Carburetors and their supposed 100+mpg??

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrein3 View Post
I'm surprised we haven't heard more snake oil type things now that gas is headed back up. Before I read this post I'm quoting I was going to mention that we always hear this stuff while gas goes up in price.

Somebody should keep track. First its the 100+ mpg carb that big oil and big car companies bought the rights to.
Then we'll hear about the magnets on the gas line.
Then we'll hear about injecting hydrogen into the carb.
Then we'll hear about the air cleaner that swirls the air and improves mileage.
Then we'll hear about the split fire spark plugs that studies have shown improve mileage.

Folks its a broken record that gets spinning when gas goes up. With today's fleet fuel mileage requirements do you really think a car company is going to keep something that gets 100+ mpg on the shelf? When Ford says use 5w-20 because it gives them an across the board 0.1% increase in fuel mileage do you think they are sitting on a 100mpg carb? When Chevrolet shuts down extra cylinders at cruise on the highway do you think they are sitting on a 100 mpg carb?

What did P. T. Barnum say? "There is a sucker born every minute"

And those suckers buy lots of the above mentioned products. [I'm not saying the fish carb isn't a fine working carb, I'm just saying that it won't get 100+ mpg in a 5000 pound truck]
Oh I in no way think I im going to get any where near the 100mpg rating ive read about thats just silly. I do however think its possible to hit the 22-25mpg range on my 305 with some help.
blazerboy_4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2011, 02:28 PM   #17
blazerboy_4life
70Custom10
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Rapid City, SD
Posts: 322
Re: Anybody ever heard of "Fish" Carburetors and their supposed 100+mpg??

Quote:
Originally Posted by DANTIP View Post
A friend of mine is an engineer at Ford and specializes in port fuel-injection system design. We have had many conversations regarding carburetors, fuel-injection, fuel mix ratios, etc. My wife doesn't hang around long when we talk. Basically, gasoline engines operate properly when the optimum mixture of fuel and air is maintained. These guys get into enormous detail but it comes down to mixing the best/optimum amount of fuel with a given (or measured) amount of air. He admitted the best performing carburetor for road-driven vehicles is a properly set-up Quadrajet. Their testing shows a Q-Jet can approach port fuel-injection performance and economy.

Claims of dramatically better fuel economy with different gadgets aren't real.

My friend did convince me to buy a digital read-out system for carburetor set-up. These devices rely on an O2 sensor (you have to weld a bung into the exhaust pipe) to give you a mixture readout. With this and a setup procedure for the Q-jet, you can feel good about your carb performance. Indiana does not require any testing of tailpipe emissions, but I'll bet the mixture device could help you nail a lean setup that would aid in passing a sniff test.
Which digital system did you go with and how did it work out for you?
blazerboy_4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2011, 02:30 PM   #18
brad_man_72
the boat guy
 
brad_man_72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: springfield mo
Posts: 2,339
Re: Anybody ever heard of "Fish" Carburetors and their supposed 100+mpg??

theirs plenty of carbs produing 100mpg, but their all bolted to mopeds and scooters!
__________________
67, swb, fleet, tach, throttle, 5.3, 4l60e, 3.73's, fuel cell, 5 lug, p.d.b., 4-6 drop. great little truck
66, stevens drag/ski 18' silouette, 350, 2.02 doublehump heads. comp extreme marine 278 cam, vette 7 fin valve covers, old polished edelbrock intake, velvetdrive, casale v-drive, adj cavitation plate.
28, model a rpu project,
brad_man_72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2011, 02:34 PM   #19
Vintage Windmills
Vintage 4x4s
 
Vintage Windmills's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Prior Lake, MN
Posts: 4,305
Re: Anybody ever heard of "Fish" Carburetors and their supposed 100+mpg??

Quote:
Originally Posted by DANTIP View Post
A friend of mine is an engineer at Ford and specializes in port fuel-injection system design. We have had many conversations regarding carburetors, fuel-injection, fuel mix ratios, etc. My wife doesn't hang around long when we talk. Basically, gasoline engines operate properly when the optimum mixture of fuel and air is maintained. These guys get into enormous detail but it comes down to mixing the best/optimum amount of fuel with a given (or measured) amount of air. He admitted the best performing carburetor for road-driven vehicles is a properly set-up Quadrajet. Their testing shows a Q-Jet can approach port fuel-injection performance and economy.

Claims of dramatically better fuel economy with different gadgets aren't real.

My friend did convince me to buy a digital read-out system for carburetor set-up. These devices rely on an O2 sensor (you have to weld a bung into the exhaust pipe) to give you a mixture readout. With this and a setup procedure for the Q-jet, you can feel good about your carb performance. Indiana does not require any testing of tailpipe emissions, but I'll bet the mixture device could help you nail a lean setup that would aid in passing a sniff test.
I bet he will also tell you that even if a vehicle is 100% efficent, you'll still only get 30-40mpg due to wind resistance and tire to road resistance. It takes that much gas to keep it moving. Anyone will tell you this that has done the math or understands physics

Edit: this only applies for full size trucks, smaller vehicle #'s can be higher.
__________________

67 GMC K1500 Custom- 305V6 SM420, PTO, Ram Assist, yellow (the outcast) (project period correct upgrades)
67 GMC C2500 351V6 TH400, AC, PS, PB (can't decide what to do with. Update, decided to keep and will restore )
86 CHV K30 502 th400, apple red NEW
71 CHV K20 350 SM465, ochre (saved work truck)
71 CHV K20 292 SM465, white, tach, PTO, (future project)
72 CHV K20 350 350th, medium blue (project stocker)
01 CHV K2500hd crew, indigo blue

^3 dont run and the others don't see winter either
'86 K30 Cummins "Fireside" thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=649649
'71 K20 "get driveable" thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=590642
'72 K20 Build Thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=493477&page=6

Last edited by Vintage Windmills; 02-07-2011 at 02:35 PM.
Vintage Windmills is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2011, 02:41 PM   #20
DANTIP
Registered User
 
DANTIP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA
Posts: 1,880
Re: Anybody ever heard of "Fish" Carburetors and their supposed 100+mpg??

Quote:
Originally Posted by blazerboy_4life View Post
Which digital system did you go with and how did it work out for you?
It's an NGK AFX. It is intended to be mounted but I use it to help friends set-up their carbs, then we plug the O2 bung. Takes all of the guess-work out!
DANTIP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2011, 02:44 PM   #21
blazerboy_4life
70Custom10
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Rapid City, SD
Posts: 322
Re: Anybody ever heard of "Fish" Carburetors and their supposed 100+mpg??

Quote:
Originally Posted by DANTIP View Post
It's an NGK AFX. It is intended to be mounted but I use it to help friends set-up their carbs, then we plug the O2 bung. Takes all of the guess-work out!
Yeah it sounds like a good idea. Ive got at least 2 more motors in my near future and I think this could help simplify a lot of things!

Edit: i just went to the website and dont see any pricing. What do those usually run if you dont mind my asking?

Last edited by blazerboy_4life; 02-07-2011 at 02:47 PM. Reason: added a question
blazerboy_4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2011, 03:27 PM   #22
ChevLoRay
Old Skool Club
 
ChevLoRay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Benton, AR "The Heart of Arkansas"
Posts: 10,880
Re: Anybody ever heard of "Fish" Carburetors and their supposed 100+mpg??

During the Arab oil embargo of '73, there were several devices that claimed fastastic gas economy, that we were encouraged to buy. Fish carbs were one of them. There was another item, that was a lot cheaper. It was a simple device that leaned out your mixture by way of a vacuum in your intake...thinking burnt valves?

There have also been rumours that said the "car companies" were buying up the patents and parts so we would have to buy gas guzzlers.

Then, within the past 10 or so years, we had the Tornado. Not saying anything about it except their money-back guarantee is valid.

As long as the internal combustion engine has been in existance, or almost, someone has been trying to invent the perfect carburetion device and claiming unbelievable economy. Electronic fuel injection is superior to old-tech carburetors, but there are other tricks that will help. They're simple, too, if you think about it. Try keeping your tires inflated to the higher specification on the sidewall. Some tires are rated to carry their loads at 45PSI. Whatever that number is, believe that the higher value will let the tires roll down the road more easily. Underinflated tires will create drag and use more fuel.
__________________
Member Nr. 2770

'96 GMC Sportside; 4.3/SLT - Daily driven....constantly needs washed.

'69 C-10 SWB; 350/TH400 - in limbo

The older I get, the better I was.
ChevLoRay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2011, 03:35 PM   #23
406 Q-ship
Registered User
 
406 Q-ship's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Largo Florida
Posts: 632
Re: Anybody ever heard of "Fish" Carburetors and their supposed 100+mpg??

Fish carburators is from the 1950's.
__________________
Lifes journey is not to arrive at the gate well preserved, it is to slide in sideways all used up and wore out yelling.....God what'a ride!

Where patience fails, force prevails

Stapp's Ironical Paradox "The universal aptitude for ineptitude makes any human accomplishment an incredible miracle."
406 Q-ship is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2011, 04:02 PM   #24
VA72C10
VA72C10
 
VA72C10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Midlothian, VA
Posts: 25,269
Re: Anybody ever heard of "Fish" Carburetors and their supposed 100+mpg??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tkmadone View Post
I think I still have it somewhere...
I think if I did I'd be looking for it and have it on ebay within the hour
__________________
Looking for a 67-72 swb or blazer project in or around VA.
VA72C10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2011, 05:09 PM   #25
71meangreenc10
Its a Truck Thing......
 
71meangreenc10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sierra Vista, Arizona
Posts: 3,158
Re: Anybody ever heard of "Fish" Carburetors and their supposed 100+mpg??

Quote:
Originally Posted by MARKDTN View Post
It's not a new product, been around a long long time.


Sorry,

Never heard of it till this post......


Smitty
__________________
71 C10 283/3SPD Full Resto
71 GMC 1500 Sierra Grande http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=518599
70 C10 Suburban Former military GSA truck.
72 Chevy Blazer 4X4, Sloppy Jo, Mountain Climber. Wife says no more trucks. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=707378
72 GMC 1 Ton Motor Home, wife said no more trucks until she saw this one. Gen 3 6.0/4L80E 4.10 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=761110
68 GMC Suburban was 3/4 ton, now 1/2.Wife shook her head
71 C30 Wrecker
71 C20 Scott-Bilt As weird as it gets..BB Cheyenne AC Truck
68 GMC Long Stepside. They keep following me home
71 C20 Longhorn/Ole Yellor
69 C30 Former Motor Home, Flat Bed time

Last edited by 71meangreenc10; 02-07-2011 at 05:09 PM.
71meangreenc10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
carburetor, fish, mpg, power


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com