Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-17-2022, 07:16 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: central California
Posts: 2,726
|
Port matching a ramhorn
I'm getting ready to send my exhaust manifolds to Jet-Hot for a ceramic coat. It was mentioned by a member in a different thread I had started on a related topic that I should clean up the ports prior to sending them out. My question is if it is really worth it on a warmed up 283, and if so how do I do that? I have a Dremmel tool and the manifolds are off now. Looking at the pictures, do I just bevel out the sooty areas on the flanges where I'm assuming they were shrouding the head ports. These were running without gaskets so my novice brain tells me that the carbon around the manifold ports was deposited there because those areas were shrouding the head. Is it simply a matter of evening those areas out with a bevel that tapers into the port?
Thank you for any advice you may have. You can see I tried it once before in the center. It was slow going and it was hard to keep it even. Time was short back then so I just quit. Now I have time if it is worth doing. Last edited by AcampoDave; 09-17-2022 at 07:23 PM. |
09-18-2022, 08:24 AM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Eastern TN
Posts: 1,919
|
Re: Port matching a ramhorn
Others may disagree but I would bevel those soot areas back into the manifold. A better word would be taper. Although it isn't to bad on those manifolds it does cause a turbulence at that area which hurts flow. Personally I would take out a tad bit extra to account for slop in the mounting bolts.
|
09-18-2022, 09:14 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: TN.
Posts: 7,719
|
Re: Port matching a ramhorn
It does help the performance.
If you just do the exhaust manifolds, It will not affect your gas mileage that much. If you do a full port and polish job of both Intake and Exhaust in the cylinder head and manifolds, You will notice a significate increase in performance and fuel consumption. Getting the balance of flow is the key. The path of least resistance is the key in porting and polishing.
__________________
________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________ 84 Chevy K-20 63 Impala (my high school car) http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...Crew Cab Build |
09-18-2022, 02:50 PM | #4 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: central California
Posts: 2,726
|
Re: Port matching a ramhorn
Quote:
I've been working on the manifolds all morning. They're looking good. |
|
09-18-2022, 03:51 PM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: central California
Posts: 2,726
|
Re: Port matching a ramhorn
Done...I used a Fel Pro 1444 one peice gasket as a template too since it really fit the head well. Thanks for your help.
Last edited by AcampoDave; 09-18-2022 at 04:05 PM. |
09-18-2022, 03:54 PM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: central California
Posts: 2,726
|
Re: Port matching a ramhorn
Pic didn't fly.
|
09-18-2022, 04:03 PM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: TN.
Posts: 7,719
|
Re: Port matching a ramhorn
Quote:
My statement was before I seen you have the heads done. The manifolds alone will not make much difference. You should notice a Big improvement. Manifolds look good
__________________
________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________ 84 Chevy K-20 63 Impala (my high school car) http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...Crew Cab Build |
|
09-20-2022, 11:05 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Moraga, CA
Posts: 799
|
Re: Port matching a ramhorn
I'd like to see the Engine Masters guys do an episode on that. The ram manifolds are the coolest looking for sure and that's what I plan to use. But what difference does it make to performance? Ported vs. not. 1962 Corvette large diameter outlet rams vs newer small outlet rams. vs. headers. vs. 1970s LT-1 manifolds. The whole spectrum. Enquiring minds want to know.
__________________
(Very) Slow-Going Build Thread: Stock 1970 Short Step with Stock 1970 LT-1 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=567340 Last edited by mattfranklin; 09-20-2022 at 04:53 PM. |
09-21-2022, 10:27 AM | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: central California
Posts: 2,726
|
Re: Port matching a ramhorn
I completely agree. Real world stuff. Send them an email and tell them to do it!
|
09-21-2022, 10:48 PM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Eastern TN
Posts: 1,919
|
Re: Port matching a ramhorn
Easy answer guys. The rams horns will out perform a log manifold any day. It's more balanced off a flow. They are not as good as headers for all out performance but work well for a street motor. On a 5500 rpm motor I wouldn't question running them. As for the 2.5" vet vs truck manifolds. They appear to flow way more CFMs. Side by side is pretty obvious. I believe that Bob vizzard discussed them in his hot rodding a SBC book. 2.5" vs headers should ne about 20HP for a 350 performance street motor.
As far as the OPs motor goes. The stock rams with port matching is more than enough. The 305 heads flow better than stock but we arnt talking max CFM SBC stuff here. The 305 heads barely flow enough to work a 350 properly. Even with some mild porting. The smaller exhaust manifolds should be more in the flow requirements of his motor and may even provide some scavenging effect. Run what ya got. |
Bookmarks |
|
|