The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-04-2020, 08:06 PM   #26
bnorth
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Salmon Arm BC
Posts: 137
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma

That looks like the Russell performance logo and a 1990 build date to me. http://www.russellperformance.com/ They are owned by Edelbrock now but a quick web search reveals they used to produce a few suspension parts back in the 90's.
__________________
1970 C10 l/b 292/4spd
Build: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=811062
bnorth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2020, 12:52 PM   #27
GMJimmy
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 164
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma

Quote:
Originally Posted by bnorth View Post
That looks like the Russell performance logo and a 1990 build date to me. http://www.russellperformance.com/ They are owned by Edelbrock now but a quick web search reveals they used to produce a few suspension parts back in the 90's.
Thanks, I contacted Russell a year ago to see if they could tell me anything about them. The guy on the phone insisted they never made them. I asked him how long he has been with the company,,, he said 10 years. Then I asked him if there was anybody there that was around in the 90's. He laughed and said no. Times they are a changin!
GMJimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2020, 12:58 PM   #28
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,910
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMJimmy View Post
Thanks, I contacted Russell to see if they could tell me anything about them. The guy on the phone insisted they never made them. I asked him how long he has been with the company,,, he said 10 years. Then I asked him if there was anybody there that was around in the 90's. He laughed and said no. Times they are a changin!
I know they sold spindles under the Russell name years & years ago. But, that was years & years ago so internet searching for some old instructions or tech stuff is probably the best you'll find if you find anything At all.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2020, 03:11 PM   #29
Greasey Harley
Registered User
 
Greasey Harley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Post Falls, ID
Posts: 884
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma

http://russellperformance.com/

I don't think they make spindles any longer.

EDIT:
...I just looked back through this post, I guess I was a little late with that information.
__________________
Insert clever text here:

Last edited by Greasey Harley; 12-05-2020 at 03:16 PM.
Greasey Harley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2020, 04:08 PM   #30
GMJimmy
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 164
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTI View Post
I know they sold spindles under the Russell name years & years ago. But, that was years & years ago so internet searching for some old instructions or tech stuff is probably the best you'll find if you find anything At all.
After several Google searches there was nothing helpful at all.
GMJimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2020, 05:18 PM   #31
GMJimmy
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 164
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma

UPDATE:
Well after watching several videos and tons of research I'm guessing I have 5 or 6 inch drop springs (as lolife99 suggested) in the rear with 2 inch lowering blocks so total drop of 7 or 8 inches. So basically a fraction of an inch from the factory bump stop and about 1-1/2 inches from the tubing hitting the frame. In other words limited travel. I was going to C notch the frame with a CPP kit but if I do it's likely going to cause the rear end housing to hit the bed floor and my over the axle exhaust. With the tubing jacked up touching the frame I have about 1-1/4 inches before the diff hits the bed floor and about an inch before the tubing hits the over axle exhaust. I guess my choices are to C notch it and install bump stops to limit travel or remove the 2 inch lowering blocks and see how it looks. I was also thinking to try leaving things as they are and cut the factory bump stops so I get a little more travel but not hit the frame. I do not want to alter the exhaust or the bed floor to accommodate the extra room I'll have with the c notch. Guys I've been working as a mechanic most of my life so I'm no stranger to all of this but I'm NOT familiar with the drop modifications available and the consequences for doing it. Lack of experience on my part. I removed the rear springs to try and Identify them with no luck. They are free standing at 9-1/2 inches and have a .692" wire diameter. What I DON'T UNDERSTAND is why the front sits as low as it does with ONLY drop spindles and stock springs with new lower control arms. I know they are stock replacements because I installed them. Any suggestions are appreciated!
Thanks
Jim

Last edited by GMJimmy; 12-13-2020 at 06:58 PM.
GMJimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2020, 06:08 PM   #32
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,910
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMJimmy View Post
UPDATE:
Well after watching several videos and tons of research I'm guessing I have 5 or 6 inch drop springs (as lolife99 suggested) in the rear with 2 inch lowering blocks so total drop of 7 or 8 inches. So basically a fraction of an inch from the factory bump stop and about 1-1/2 inches from the tubing hitting the frame. In other words limited travel. I was going to C notch the frame with a CCP kit but if I do it's likely going to cause the rear end housing to hit the bed floor and my over the axle exhaust. With the tubing jacked up touching the frame I have about 1-1/4 inches before the diff hits the bed floor and about an inch before the tubing hits the over axle exhaust. I guess my choices are to C notch it and install bump stops to limit travel or remove the 2 inch lowering blocks and see how it looks. I was also thinking to try leaving things as they are and cut the factory bump stops so I get a little more travel but not hit the frame. I do not want to alter the exhaust or the bed floor to accommodate the extra room I'll have with the c notch. Guys I've been working as a mechanic most of my life so I'm no stranger to all of this but I'm NOT familiar with the drop modifications available and the consequences for doing it. Lack of experience on my part. I removed the rear springs to try and Identify them with no luck. They are free standing at 9-1/2 inches and have a .692" wire diameter. What I DON'T UNDERSTAND is why the front sits as low as it does with ONLY drop spindles and stock springs with new lower control arms. I know they are stock replacements because I installed them. Any suggestions are appreciated!
Thanks
Jim
You're saying you put the "stock" springs in there & stock a-arms?
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2020, 06:15 PM   #33
GMJimmy
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 164
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTI View Post
You're saying you put the "stock" springs in there & stock a-arms?
Yes. The front has stock replacement lower A arms and Moog stock 6082 coil springs. As I said earlier I can't identify the drop spindles.
GMJimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2020, 10:53 PM   #34
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,910
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma

I went back to look @ the pics again.

Your front wheel/tire combo measures @ 26.6". Given the gap above to the fender lip, I'll say 3" spindle drop up front. At 27.7" in the back, probably 3" springs & 2" blocks.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2020, 11:04 PM   #35
GMJimmy
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 164
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTI View Post
I went back to look @ the pics again.

Your front wheel/tire combo measures @ 26.6". Given the gap above to the fender lip, I'll say 3" spindle drop up front. At 27.7" in the back, probably 3" springs & 2" blocks.
Scoti
Thanks for your opinions on this. I guess I'll have to figure out what to do about the rear drop. Not quite enough clearance to leave it but a C notch will create other issues. I may have to live with a bumpy ride?
GMJimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2020, 07:02 PM   #36
GMJimmy
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 164
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma

Another thing that concerns me is the rear shocks. Although they don't bottom out at full compression, they travel well beyond the spring at full extension. If the springs weren't bolted top and bottom they would fall out when the suspension was completely extended. What do guys do in this situation?
GMJimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2020, 07:23 PM   #37
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,910
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMJimmy View Post
Another thing that concerns me is the rear shocks. Although they don't bottom out at full compression, they travel well beyond the spring at full extension. If the springs weren't bolted top and bottom they would fall out when the suspension was completely extended. What do guys do in this situation?
You need a shock that doesn't bottom out on compression or extension. If it doesn't do that, you're ok. Shock angle can always be improved on the Truck-arm set-ups vs how they came from GM.

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=451200
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2020, 07:56 PM   #38
GMJimmy
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 164
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTI View Post
You need a shock that doesn't bottom out on compression or extension. If it doesn't do that, you're ok. Shock angle can always be improved on the Truck-arm set-ups vs how they came from GM.

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=451200
Thanks SCOTI

Usually it's the shocks bottoming out that keeps the suspension from fully extending and springs from falling out.

Suspension fully extended sitting on the shocks.

I have shock relocation brackets installed.


Last edited by GMJimmy; 12-14-2020 at 08:03 PM.
GMJimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2020, 08:38 PM   #39
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,910
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma

The coils should be bolted in top & bottom.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2020, 09:08 PM   #40
GMJimmy
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 164
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTI View Post
The coils should be bolted in top & bottom.
Yeah I know. Just had everything out to measure up for a C notch and wanted to show how much more the shocks travel than the springs.
GMJimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2020, 10:06 PM   #41
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,910
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMJimmy View Post
Yeah I know. Just had everything out to measure up for a C notch and wanted to show how much more the shocks travel than the springs.
I figured it was something like that. But sometimes 'ya never know so its worth mentioning.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2020, 12:33 AM   #42
GMJimmy
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 164
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma

I'm a little concerned about my shocks after I install my C notch. Can anyone help me with a part number for some shocks with a 6 inch drop? Mine will be close to bottoming out with the extra travel.
Thanks!
GMJimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2020, 05:39 PM   #43
LS short box
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Carlos MN
Posts: 1,922
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma

I got my shocks from Bell tech. I called them and told what I have (6"rear drop/4" front drop) and they gave me the part number for the front and rear. They offer two types. They told me to buy the less expensive model.
LS short box is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2020, 08:38 PM   #44
GMJimmy
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 164
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma

Quote:
Originally Posted by LS short box View Post
I got my shocks from Bell tech. I called them and told what I have (6"rear drop/4" front drop) and they gave me the part number for the front and rear. They offer two types. They told me to buy the less expensive model.
Thank you! Iv'e been trying to find a parts source that doesn't answer AHH What, when I ask about shocks for a dropped C10!
GMJimmy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com