|
04-17-2022, 05:34 PM
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Santa Clara UT
Posts: 17
|
Front cross member
I bought a front cross member to convert my 65 SBW to power disc brakes. I can not identify what it came out of. everything looks like a mid 80s cross member except the motor mount perch's. there are free standing. A little help would be appreciated.
|
|
|
|
04-17-2022, 08:05 PM
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: central California
Posts: 2,726
|
Re: Front cross member
Im guessing those motor mounts were put there by a previous owner. Those nuts look newer and there appears to be unused factory mount holes. I don't really know my 80's trucks too well though.
|
|
|
|
|
04-17-2022, 09:30 PM
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Hickory Flat, GA
Posts: 4,421
|
Re: Front cross member
I wonder if this one is out of a diesel square? I'm not sure what the difference is between the Oldsmobile diesel engine mounts vs. the regular sbc mounts. I don't believe they are big block mounts because those went to the top of the frame in the trucks
__________________
Christian Carpenter 1963 C10 - Frankentruck 283, 3 speed with overdrive Overdrive wiring here1963-ish truck bed trailer - Half-Wit 1981 C10 - Penny 305, th350 1995 Dodge Dakota Sport "I'll put it simple: if you're going hard enough left, you'll find yourself turning right." - Doc Hudson |
|
|
|
|
04-17-2022, 10:22 PM
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Derby Kansas
Posts: 357
|
Re: Front cross member
70-80's with maybe inline 6 mounts?
|
|
|
|
|
04-18-2022, 09:45 AM
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,907
|
Re: Front cross member
Definitely a 73-87 x-member or @ least 73-87 arms.
I've never seen a 'floating' motor-mount stanchion/tower on these trucks (C10's). All of the trucks I've seen throughout my years were anchored @ the top of the rail as well as @ the x-member (I started paying attention to this stuff in the early 80's through present). I'm betting that was driveway-built.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
|
|
|
04-18-2022, 11:35 AM
|
#6 |
|
But Found Her 25yrs Later!
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Oregon City, Oregon
Posts: 10,460
|
Re: Front cross member
They don't look original to that cross member.
__________________
I lost my 65 - Found it 25 years later: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=426650 66 C20 Service Truck: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=428035 |
|
|
|
|
04-18-2022, 01:28 PM
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 4,775
|
Re: Front cross member
You do know you don't need the whole cross member to do disc brakes. You can just use the spindles with your original control arms. Unless you want to upgrade front suspension to later version.
__________________
"A man and his truck, what a beautiful thing" 65 Short Fleetside BBC 65 Long Fleetside 283 3 on the tree for now. my build thread http://www.67-72chevytrucks.com/vboa...d.php?t=259536 |
|
|
|
|
04-26-2022, 04:04 PM
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Santa Clara UT
Posts: 17
|
Re: Front cross member
They are original mounts. After looking further the measurement across the frame is almost 6 inches wider than a interchangeable crossmember ( 73-87). I am guessing a van or commercial truck. The thing that is odd is that it has 5on5 wheels. Weird
|
|
|
|
|
04-26-2022, 04:27 PM
|
#9 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,907
|
Re: Front cross member
Quote:
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
|
|
|
|
|
04-26-2022, 07:41 PM
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: central California
Posts: 2,726
|
Re: Front cross member
My money is on "van" they are indeed wider both front and rear.
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2022, 10:53 AM
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2022
Location: Illinois
Posts: 145
|
Re: Front cross member
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2022, 12:22 PM
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Santa Clara UT
Posts: 17
|
Re: Front cross member
Sorry but i returned it to the Salvage yard and exchanged it for the proper size crossmember. I paid 250 for everything including the P/S gear.
|
|
|
|
|
05-17-2022, 01:12 PM
|
#13 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,907
|
Re: Front cross member
Quote:
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
|
|
|
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
