|
11-29-2012, 10:55 PM | #1 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: oregon coast
Posts: 248
|
Re: 1968
Quote:
you shouldnt nee to pull the motor or change the cross member. change the ball joints to match your spindles, get the 72 flex brake lines/ m/c /disc drum prop valve and be back on track. why would the cross member have to swap? like i said i may be confusing all my info from the last few weeks with yours, but check before you back up. it might save you a day. good luck in either case and nice work on the sheet metal so far.
__________________
i love every machine. even the ones i hate. Current project (1959) fifty niner gmc fleetside: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...70#post6514670 MY daily driver truck thread : http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=544460 |
|
11-30-2012, 08:06 AM | #2 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Topeka Kansas
Posts: 2,655
|
Re: 1968
Quote:
While it is true you could just relocate the brake hose brackets from the back of the 1967-71 crossmember to the front you might as well change out the whole crossmember to the 1972 version since he has one handy, also the 1971 brake line kits are on backorder untill the end of time and the 1972 brake line kits are in stock and ready to go, however its six of one half dozen of another, both ways will work just fine. In my opinion the 1972 brake line routing is superior to all other years, there is a reason why they changed the routing for the 1972 model year, if you study the design you will figure out why. Last edited by Xeen; 11-30-2012 at 08:14 AM. |
|
11-30-2012, 09:30 PM | #3 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Homosassa, Fl.
Posts: 2,965
|
Re: 1968
Quote:
|
|
12-01-2012, 12:02 PM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Topeka Kansas
Posts: 2,655
|
Re: 1968
If there are other differences they are minor and wont cause any problems.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|