The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-19-2020, 09:12 AM   #1
steeeeeve
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: austin Texas
Posts: 37
rear end ratio opinions

I've got '68 C10
new 350 V8 -Nothing special 250HP approx
Turbo 400
Stock 15" wheels
currently 4.10 rear end


Not looking to do burnouts or win any races off the line. Just want to be able to easily cruise at 65-70 without winding out the engine.

I'm thinking 3.23

What do you think?

thanks,
steve
steeeeeve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2020, 10:26 AM   #2
yuccales
Registered User
 
yuccales's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Northern Calif.
Posts: 3,586
Re: rear end ratio opinions

The 3.08's in my 70 putts along just fine in town and on the highway. I don't use it to tow anything.
yuccales is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2020, 10:58 AM   #3
LockDoc
The Older Generation

 
LockDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Montezuma, Iowa
Posts: 25,326
Re: rear end ratio opinions

Quote:
Originally Posted by steeeeeve View Post
I've got '68 C10
new 350 V8 -Nothing special 250HP approx
Turbo 400
Stock 15" wheels
currently 4.10 rear end


Not looking to do burnouts or win any races off the line. Just want to be able to easily cruise at 65-70 without winding out the engine.

I'm thinking 3.23

What do you think?

thanks,
steve


Not sure if you were actually thinking 3.73 or not, I don't think there is a 3.23 for these trucks. There was a 3.36 but I'm not sure what it was used in.

If you were thinking 3.73 I don't think it will help you that much. The 3.07 would definitely give you a higher top end but I don't know how it would do on the bottom end with the lower HP 350.

LockDoc
__________________
Leon

Locksmith, Specializing In Antique Trucks, Automobiles, & Motorcycles

(My Dually Pickup Project Thread)

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=829820

-
LockDoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2020, 12:03 PM   #4
RustyBucket
Registered User
 
RustyBucket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Space Coast, Fl.
Posts: 1,050
Re: rear end ratio opinions

Always heard about OPINIONS being like "REAR ENDS"....... and truly, most everybody's got one of each.

I have 3.07's in both of my trucks. The GMC has a mild 350/700r and it'll cruise 60-70mph comfortably in 3rd gear (1-1 ratio). Not lazy off the line either. 700r does have a lower 1st, gear ratio than your 400 trans. You might find a
complete rear end on CL or Marketplace.. most I see are around here are 3.07's. It'd be cheaper than buying a gears & having them fitted, unless you can set one up.
__________________
Dad always said, "Son, WISH IN ONE HAND, and ......."
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
Current toy trucks:
'71 GMC 1500 SUPER CUSTOM short/step, orig. dk. blue, 350/700r, ps,pb, A/C
'72 Blazer 2wd, ochre & white, 454, tremecTKO 500 5spd. ps, pb, A/C, tilt

Last 10yrs of hobby vehicles, had a FEW more in the 50yrs. before these:
'66 Plymouth Belvedere City of Miami cop car clone.
'70 Nova 406"sb, 13.5-1, solid roller, Brodix, p.glide/t.brake, back halved, 9" Ford, spool 4.88, cage,ladder bar/coilover, 10.5 tire....... SOLD!!
'67 C10 short/step side mount spare -- SOLD!!
'72 Jimmy 2wd, 350/350, ps, pb, fun driver, lots of bondo & a shiny red paint job..... SOLD!!
'69 Nova 350, 4spd, A/C, ps, p.b, ...SOLD!!
RustyBucket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2020, 12:09 PM   #5
gmc684x4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Whitehorse yukon
Posts: 1,218
Re: rear end ratio opinions

you can go for your carrier is 3.73 any gearing smaller needs a new center section
Many of our trucks are 3.08 or 3.73 in 1/2 tons

Here is a quick rpm calculator

https://www.differentials.com/techni...io-calculator/
gmc684x4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2020, 12:12 PM   #6
gmc684x4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Whitehorse yukon
Posts: 1,218
Re: rear end ratio opinions

I would look at 700r4 or a built 200r4 and add overdrive with out the need for computer control

https://www.hotrod.com/articles/ccrp...mission-build/
gmc684x4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2020, 12:48 PM   #7
SWEET7T
Try spinnin 4 rear tars
 
SWEET7T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 757
Re: rear end ratio opinions

3.08 gear set. Turns 2500rpm at 65-70. I have a 307ci with a 2-barrel. High altitude and steep hills will slow it down, but I've managed to stay above 60 on the climbs on the interstates.
__________________
SWEET7T
1970 C10, 2wd, LB, 307/TH350/3.08. PS, PB
SWEET7T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2020, 04:12 PM   #8
jocko
Senior Member
 
jocko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Godley, TX
Posts: 17,933
Re: rear end ratio opinions

I'd retain the rear as is because while 3.73 will be nicer on the highway - it's not as nice as a 4.10 with 700R4 O/D, which makes your 4.10s a 2.87 at highway speeds - and retains the exact same current acceleration performance in 1st-3rd that you have today. I'd get built 700R4 though, not a junkyard swap, because 4.10s can be kinda rough on it if you do the occasional burnout...
jocko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2020, 09:15 AM   #9
Minkota
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: West Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 295
Re: rear end ratio opinions

Quote:
Originally Posted by steeeeeve View Post
I've got '68 C10
new 350 V8 -Nothing special 250HP approx
Turbo 400
Stock 15" wheels
currently 4.10 rear end
You did not mention the Tire height, that can make a difference as well.
Minkota is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2020, 09:22 AM   #10
tutone
Registered User
 
tutone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: hickory, ky
Posts: 1,249
Re: rear end ratio opinions

I had almost exactly the same set up in my last 72. 3.07 or 3.08, whatever you want to call them, are all you will need with that combo. I ran 2.35/75/15s on mine and got 15 mpg if I behaved. Even driving it hard, it wasn't all that bad.
__________________
:My build thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=807535
1971 c10 swb/1972 K10 swb/1968 Camaro 350/4spd
1955 210 2 dr sedan/1998 RCSB Z71
tutone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2020, 09:33 AM   #11
68Stepbed
Registered User
 
68Stepbed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 10-Uh-See
Posts: 5,609
Re: rear end ratio opinions

3.08 will be a good gear if you just plan to cruise around and be able to run at highway speeds. If you want a tad more punch off the line and still be able to run highway speeds, 3.42 is a great gear.

The only aftermarket gear options for the stock 12 bolt truck rearend are 3.08, 3.42, 3.73, 4.11, 4.56, 4.88, and some offer a 5.13.

Keep in mind, to change to a 3.42 or 3.08 from the current 4.11 will require a new carrier. 3.73 and lower gears are a 4-series carrier. 3.42 and 3.08 use a 3-series carrier. The difference is ring gear thickness. This may not help your case, but gearsets are available to put a 4-series gear on a 3-series carrier, but not the other way around.
__________________
Matt

68 C10 stepside, LS1/700R4, TCI Engineering suspension system
68Stepbed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2020, 08:27 PM   #12
TwoFiftyShifter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Gwinnett GA
Posts: 1,803
Re: rear end ratio opinions

If 70mph cruise is your priority, the 3.07 or an OD trans. Even with 3.42s, you would be at 2800 at 70. Not exactly a mellow cruise. With a 3.07 gear swap, you won't be towing anything - which probably isn't happening anyway.
__________________
1982 K10 SWB
1987 V20 - Sold - Doh!
TwoFiftyShifter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2020, 10:32 PM   #13
HO455
Post Whore
 
HO455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 10,796
Re: rear end ratio opinions

Shining a little science on the discussion.

http://www.alloyusa.com/gear-ratio-calculator/
__________________
Thanks to Bob and Jeanie and everyone else at Superior Performance for all their great help.
RIP Bob Parks.
1967 Burban the WMB,1991 S(stink)-10 Blazer,1969 GTO, 1970 Javelin, 1952 F2 Ford 4X4, 29 Model A, 72 Firebird. 85 Alfa Romeo
If it breaks I didn't want it in the first place
The WMB repair thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=698377
HO455 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com