The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-05-2023, 10:55 PM   #1
Toro
Registered User
 
Toro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 340
Does this new master cylinder look correct?

Take a look at the photos comparing the original MC on my 72 with power brakes, to the new AC Delco 18M1036 I just ordered. Should I be concerned that the rear reservoir is so much smaller? The bore size/depth, fittings, etc are all the same. I didn't expect to find an exact match, but just wanted to double check. Also, any ideas what that 5/16 bolt is for in the bottom of the front on the original? Never noticed it until today when I pulled it off.
Attached Images
  
Toro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2023, 01:04 AM   #2
Sheepdip
Senior Member
 
Sheepdip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Waterford California
Posts: 2,383
Re: Does this new master cylinder look correct?

I don't believe the one you pulled off is the original, your new replacement would be more like the original. Those double big potted reservoir M/C's back then were referred to as a Corvette M/C because of the front and rear disc brakes.

The larger pot is for the front disc and the smaller for the rear drums. Disc brakes as they wear move outward and keep fluid in the caliper piston bores, rear drums have automatic adjusters and return springs so piston movement is minimal and less fluid required.

My hunch on the bolt is it holds the plunger in....just a SWAG.
Sheepdip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2023, 02:22 AM   #3
71CHEVYSHORTBED402
Senior Member
 
71CHEVYSHORTBED402's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Northern Nevada
Posts: 7,129
Re: Does this new master cylinder look correct?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheepdip View Post
I don't believe the one you pulled off is the original, your new replacement would be more like the original. Those double big potted reservoir M/C's back then were referred to as a Corvette M/C because of the front and rear disc brakes.

The larger pot is for the front disc and the smaller for the rear drums. Disc brakes as they wear move outward and keep fluid in the caliper piston bores, rear drums have automatic adjusters and return springs so piston movement is minimal and less fluid required.

My hunch on the bolt is it holds the plunger in....just a SWAG.

Really good info.

To add, if it's your first MC job, bench bleed it and be sure the push rod is positioned right. You probably know to bleed the brakes no doubt.
__________________
Tony
71 Custom Deluxe, SWB, 2WD, 402, A/C. I developed an assm. guide "kit" for restoring it from ground up. With assys, the guide accts for 1000s details such as OEM identifications& part numbers, written in short order. 700+ images include assm, illust., charts, and points of interest. Much of the info. applies to all 67-72 GM trucks, and to a lessor degree all 67-72 GM vehicles. My build thread, and more on the guide https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=730025
71CHEVYSHORTBED402 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2023, 08:16 AM   #4
Toro
Registered User
 
Toro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 340
Re: Does this new master cylinder look correct?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheepdip View Post
I don't believe the one you pulled off is the original, your new replacement would be more like the original. Those double big potted reservoir M/C's back then were referred to as a Corvette M/C because of the front and rear disc brakes.

The larger pot is for the front disc and the smaller for the rear drums. Disc brakes as they wear move outward and keep fluid in the caliper piston bores, rear drums have automatic adjusters and return springs so piston movement is minimal and less fluid required.

My hunch on the bolt is it holds the plunger in....just a SWAG.
Okay, thanks. So, if this one isn't original, do you know what the correct bore depth for power brakes should be? If it was replaced before with a different type, I just want to be sure the new one is correct. The new and old both measure about 1 3/4" from deepest point back to rear edge of bore. Thanks again.
Attached Images
 
Toro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2023, 09:26 AM   #5
michael bustamante
Senior Member
 
michael bustamante's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Albuquerque NM
Posts: 7,814
Re: Does this new master cylinder look correct?

prettyy sure the bore is 1 and 1/8th
your old mc is for a drum drum system
youre new one is correst
i just replaced mine too. took forever to bench bleed! lol
__________________
1967custom
michael bustamante is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2023, 08:30 PM   #6
jocko
Senior Member
 
jocko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Godley, TX
Posts: 17,936
Re: Does this new master cylinder look correct?

Your new mc reservoir sizes are good to go for a disk/drum C10 setup, but your mc is for manual (non-power) brakes - this is the bore depth I think you are asking about in post #4(?). Pic in post #4 shows the deep bore in the mc piston. Power brakes require shallow depth hole to receive the standard intermediate pushrod (the little stub pushrod that protrudes from your booster). Recommend return your mc to swap for a power brake mc. There are other ways around this (custom intermediate pushrod) but getting the correct mc is easier in the long run, no guesswork involved. Sorry, probably not what you wanted to hear.

Out of curiosity - was this a power brake truck from the factory?
Also, can you confirm whether this is for a C10 or C20?
jocko is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2023, 09:11 PM   #7
Toro
Registered User
 
Toro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 340
Re: Does this new master cylinder look correct?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jocko View Post
Your new mc reservoir sizes are good to go for a disk/drum C10 setup, but your mc is for manual (non-power) brakes - this is the bore depth I think you are asking about in post #4(?). Pic in post #4 shows the deep bore in the mc piston. Power brakes require shallow depth hole to receive the standard intermediate pushrod (the little stub pushrod that protrudes from your booster). Recommend return your mc to swap for a power brake mc. There are other ways around this (custom intermediate pushrod) but getting the correct mc is easier in the long run, no guesswork involved. Sorry, probably not what you wanted to hear.

Out of curiosity - was this a power brake truck from the factory?
Also, can you confirm whether this is for a C10 or C20?
Thanks. I'm sorry for my lack of knowledge on this, but if you see the picture in my first post on this thread it shows the MC I removed with a deep bore, that's what I thought was the original MC, but sounds like it was replaced at some point with something else.

This is factory power brakes on a 72 K5 Blazer. So the original MC with power brakes should have been the shallow depth? If that's the case, the PO must have changed the brake push rod to a longer one to use the MC I removed. Look at the pictures below of the rod in the booster. Even if I had a shallow depth MC, I don't think it would go on just looking at how far this rod sticks out. Can you tell if that has been changed as well? What should factory setup look like? Again, I'm sorry for all the questions, but I want to put it back correctly. Thanks!!
Attached Images
  
Toro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2023, 09:39 PM   #8
jocko
Senior Member
 
jocko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Godley, TX
Posts: 17,936
Re: Does this new master cylinder look correct?

Thanks, that's a helpful set of pics! Yes, I do believe your original would have had a non-adjustable intermediate pushrod and a shallow bore mc - and that someone has likely installed an adjustable pushrod when they changed out the mc before (so someone has already gone thru exactly what you're going thru now). But then again, who knows... (maybe someone else has an original setup just like this?? - all the intermediate pushrods I've seen from the factory were non-adjustable, but could just be the trucks I've owned)

So, you may be ok - just do some careful measuring to see if the adjustable pushrod will extend "almost" all the way into the bore. If it does, you're probably just fine and I'd press on with the mc you have now. If you have everything adjusted as far out as it can go and still have a good amount left before it bottoms out in the bore (like 1/4"-1/2"-ish??) then you may want to re-wicker this setup to use a correct mc and intermediate rod. My guess is that if your brakes worked before and you're just doing a brake job, you'll be just fine with what you have (i.e. if previous mc and new mc were both deep bore and the previous one worked, then that means your intermediate rod is probably already well-adjusted. But I'd still measure just to make sure - and it might be a good idea to measure the pushrod when the engine is running and vac source attached to booster - without brake pedal applied. I don't know if idle vac signal results in minor reposition of the pushrod compared with no vac signal off the top of my head).
jocko is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2023, 10:11 PM   #9
Toro
Registered User
 
Toro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 340
Re: Does this new master cylinder look correct?

I really appreciate the help. Yes, it was working before but the MC was worn out and needed to be replaced.., that's when all of this was discovered. The depth on the new MC is the same as the old one that was removed, but I will still measure for fitment. A few more rookie questions, for adjustment, it appears the threads on the rod are for that purpose? Also, it seems the pushrod is just sitting on a rod inside the booster and not actually secured, meaning that I can pull the rod out towards front and it comes off only being held in by the flange and the grommet on the booster. To put it back you sort of have to feel around until it slides back in place. Does that sound normal? And finally, is there supposed to be an o-ring or gasket that goes between the flange on the MC and the booster? Old one didn't have one, and there wasn't one in the new box.
Toro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2023, 10:18 PM   #10
KQQL IT
At the body shop.
 
KQQL IT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Land of fruits and nuts.
Posts: 5,135
Re: Does this new master cylinder look correct?

Your new one looks like the one i replaced the other day.
Attached Images
  
__________________
" That didnt make it any newer "
" Dont antique the equipment "

Last edited by KQQL IT; 07-06-2023 at 10:51 PM. Reason: Pic
KQQL IT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2023, 11:24 PM   #11
jocko
Senior Member
 
jocko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Godley, TX
Posts: 17,936
Re: Does this new master cylinder look correct?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toro View Post
I really appreciate the help. Yes, it was working before but the MC was worn out and needed to be replaced.., that's when all of this was discovered. The depth on the new MC is the same as the old one that was removed, but I will still measure for fitment. A few more rookie questions, for adjustment, it appears the threads on the rod are for that purpose? Also, it seems the pushrod is just sitting on a rod inside the booster and not actually secured, meaning that I can pull the rod out towards front and it comes off only being held in by the flange and the grommet on the booster. To put it back you sort of have to feel around until it slides back in place. Does that sound normal? And finally, is there supposed to be an o-ring or gasket that goes between the flange on the MC and the booster? Old one didn't have one, and there wasn't one in the new box.
You're asking good questions, not rookie at all
- yes, the threaded end of the pushrod is for making minor rod length adjustments, if needed.
- good observation on the pushrod seeming "unattached" to the booster - but that is normal, it's how they are made, just center it and stuff it in there.
- as for the o-ring or gasket between the mc and booster - very good question (because the flat "groove" would sure make one think there would be a seal there...) but, no there is not an external o-ring or gasket that that goes in between the mc and booster (at least I've never seen one on any mc's I've removed). But there should be no need for one. Brake fluid is retained in the mc by the cup seal on the mc piston (see part #6). Vacuum seal is provided by an internal o-ring (see part #7). Would be worth knowing if anyone else has ever seen an "external" seal or o-ring between mc and booster(?) Hope that helps
Attached Images
 
jocko is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com